User talk:Spaceinvadersaresmokinggrass

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

August 2014[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Nephila clavipes may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • far as [[Argentina]] in the south and as far as lower [[Eastern Canada]] in the north during summer). Due to its migratory habits by the means of seed and fruit crates, the distribution of ''N.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 01:25, 5 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

October 2014[edit]

Hello, I noticed that you may have recently made edits to War in Donbass while logged out. Making edits while logged out reveals your IP address, which may allow others to determine your location and identity. Wikipedia's policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow the use of more than one account or IP address by one person. If this was not your intention, then please always remember to log in when editing. Thank you. Iryna Harpy (talk) 23:22, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 25[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Stilyagi (film), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Rocker and Punk. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 25 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Quebec registration plates prohibited in front?[edit]

But... why? What bad would it do to put another plate in front? I don't understand. Spaceinvadersaresmokinggrass (talk) 22:44, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

That is a question to ask the Québec government for their specific reasoning on that. I know for a fact safety is one reason some jurisdictions give. Example: A front plate might look "real" and be confused for a real plate in other jurisdictions that have a front plate, you can take your pick - i'm just hypothesizing why. I do know that some vehicles in Québec, Semis (tractor trailers) are required to have a front plate, as the trailer hides the plate on the back of a Truck (tractor), for example. Like I said, just because it's not legal, it does not mean police enforce it, and just because it hasn't been enforced by some police does not mean it will not be by others.--NotWillyWonka (talk) 02:45, 11 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 21[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kielbasa, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Turkic. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 23:12, 21 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

November 2014[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Iryna Harpy. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Kielbasa, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Iryna Harpy (talk) 00:58, 22 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Kielbasa. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox.
Etymology online does not support your re-addition of this content. Two 'perhaps' notations do not equal an "it is so". WP:POV push... or are you just engaging in WP:DE as you've in the past?
Iryna Harpy (talk) 04:39, 22 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop insulting me. It's very hard for me already, with my persona, to remain neutral to your additional remarks. I might not be here to build an encyclopedia, but I am open to discussion and willing to help, therefore assuming that I act in bad faith now because I might have in the past is blowing a bubble a little bigger than I can handle. Thanks, Spaceinvadersaresmokinggrass (talk) 18:00, 22 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, my apologies for assuming bad faith. I'll take it on good faith that you really are making a fresh start. Cheers! --Iryna Harpy (talk) 00:00, 23 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Please see your talk page, we have to talk. Thanks, Spaceinvadersaresmokinggrass (talk) 00:40, 23 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 29[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kielbasa, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mustard. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:11, 29 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

December 2014[edit]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Annexation of Crimea by the Russian Federation‎. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

  1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.-- Toddy1 (talk) 22:05, 22 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Three times is tops, right? Just wonderin' Spaceinvadersaresmokinggrass (talk) 22:27, 22 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Three reverts in 24 hours is the maximum allowed per article - see WP:3RR for details and exceptions. However it is still possible to be blocked for edit-warring without breaking the three-revert rule.
Please be aware that the Arbitration Committee has permitted Wikipedia administrators to impose discretionary sanctions on any editor editing the article on the 2014 Crimean crisis and associated pages (which include the Annexation of Crimea by the Russian Federation). Please consider this message to be a notification.-- Toddy1 (talk) 22:52, 22 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Alright. Sorry, Spaceinvadersaresmokinggrass (talk) 07:03, 23 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year Spaceinvadersaresmokinggrass![edit]

English comprehension[edit]

'After the heavy defeat[78] of Ukrainian forces in early September, confirming the accusations by the logical impossibility of the rebels to sustain as much military reserves alone,[79] representatives of Ukraine, Russia and the newly-formed Novorossiya signed the Minsk Protocol,' - is very garbled English - why are you trying to make statements all garbled - whats the point exactly? Sayerslle (talk) 21:10, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The point is that the article has one very long introduction, and many things are repeated in the other sections. I tried to sum it up chronologically, but apparently, you don't like it. Well, whatever. Two hours of my life wasted, next time I'll think before editing again. Worst part is, I already swore off touching these articles, and I still can't cope with the fact that I'm simply wasting my goddamn time with this shit. Sorry, Spaceinvadersaresmokinggrass (talk) 22:33, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I do understand. you must be highly motivated [1] I guess, to bother Sayerslle (talk) 22:53, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't do that again. It's pretty clearly unencyclopedic and not called for (and arguably causes concerns regarding the biographies of living persons policy. Pakaran 04:33, 1 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:59, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]