User talk:Southernrap

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Lil Weavah, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

  1. editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
  2. participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
  3. linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. For more details about what, exactly, constitutes a conflict of interest, please see our conflict of interest guidelines. Thank you. GlassCobra 16:44, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Lil Weavah, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. GlassCobra 03:18, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

December 2012[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Lil Weavah. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. — Ƶ§œš¹ [ãːɱ ˈfɹ̠ˤʷɪ̃ə̃nlɪ] 00:30, 28 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Lil Weavah at LilWeavah.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Lil Weavah at LilWeavah.jpg, which you've sourced to Myspace http://myspace.com/lilweavah/. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Dianna (talk) 04:43, 7 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems with File:Lil Weavah.jpg[edit]

Hello. Concerning your contribution, File:Lil Weavah.jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.gizmag.com/infinitis-emerg-e-range-extended-electric-sports-car-breaks-cover/21631/. As a copyright violation, File:Lil Weavah.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. File:Lil Weavah.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While contributions are appreciated, Wikipedia must require all contributors to understand and comply with its copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. Dianna (talk) 04:45, 7 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/JR Lemon concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/JR Lemon, a page you created has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13. Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 22:56, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your article submission JR Lemon[edit]

Hello Southernrap. It has been over six months since you last edited your article submission, entitled JR Lemon.

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note, however, that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/JR Lemon}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 01:01, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion contested: Lil Weavah[edit]

Hello Southernrap. I am just letting you know that I contested the speedy deletion of Lil Weavah, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: What copyright violations? Earwig's Copyvio Detector returns nothing. Also, A7 has previously been denied. Use articles for deletion if you want to delete this page so badly. Thank you. BangJan1999 20:34, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello BangJan1999. The copyright is related to the sources of information (many have been removed from the web due to copyright violations). It's a privacy issue and cannot be discussed in a public forum. Information cannot remain on Wiki if the sources were removed due to copyright violations (because as you stated before, the subject isn't notable if there are not significant sources veryfying information. You previously agreed with A7, even with the sources. I am sure you'd further agree with A7 again if all of those sources are no longer available. That is a significant change since the past A7 denial. Does this change your action or should I still opt for AFD? Southernrap (talk) 20:52, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Southernrap&oldid=1172399239"