User talk:Snowballa68

January 2008[edit]

Hi, the recent edit you made to Germanic Europe has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Scarian ^{Call me Pat} 23:58, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Germanic peoples[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Germanic peoples. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. - Dylansmrjones (talk) 14:22, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits are pure vandalism. At this moment, I won't revert anything (since I don't want an edit war on my hands), but at the very least you must source your edits. Your edits appear to be factually wrong, not to add completely unconstructive. The Franks definitely influenced entire France culturally, though some parts less than others. Again: Your edits are unsourced, factually incorrect, and constitutes pure vandalism.Dylansmrjones (talk) 16:02, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Germanic peoples. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 16:04, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Map[edit]

The new language map you inserted in Europe seems to be far more accurate. Thank you. However, I still found some minor details that could be corrected, such as "Sorabian" (commonly "Sorbian"), the Mirandese language which is considered a dialect of Asturian but appears in the same color as Castillian, Basque spoken in areas where it is not, etc. Can you make some changes to the image? Best regards, Hús ö nd 23:26, 3 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]