User talk:Smsarmad/Archives/2014/April
 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
The beautiful Nazia.
Nazia was involved in charity work so why you think this is a point of view rather than the fact that it is is beyond me. The whole article is littered with false information { Nazia's year of birth and record sales to name but two } and points of view so it would be nice if people like you and the other two geniuses who spend their lives editing this crap would deal with those issues as well instead of merely deleting any valid contributions I make. I only contribute things as a hobby, I don't really care about Wiki-anything and I certainly don't make it my life's work. Allah Hafiz. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Naziaji (talk • contribs) 11:57, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
- "Nazia was involved in charity work" is fine but what you were adding was "Nazia's kind and considerate personality was reflected in the charity work that she did in her native Pakistan and other countries" is a point of view that is unsuitable to be added to an encyclopedic article. See Neutral Point of View for further understanding about Wikipedia's requirements regarding neutrality. And everyone contributing here are doing voluntarily and as a hobby. -- SMS Talk 22:03, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
- No need for you to delete the whole sentence then, was there?
- Some people take their 'hobby' much more seriously than others and spend an inordinate amount of time voluntarily editing other people's work. I'd call that an obsession. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 11:47, 28 March 2014 (UTC) (talk • contribs)
- Obsession? One can see that in your contributions. -- SMS Talk 12:53, 28 March 2014 (UTC)
Removal of Link
Dear Smsarmad
That is perfectly fine. We are pretty new to Wikipedia world, thanks for your kind guidance.
Thanks Rekhta — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rekhtashayari (talk • contribs) 05:16, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
hello
actually i m in the favour of mr arif alvi as well as Mrs khushbakht shujaat... before an edit i just thought that its more neutral not to put it on comparision... alvi winner thats it — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jawwadaziz14 (talk • contribs) 08:50, 29 March 2014 (UTC)
- We need to state the facts as they are and neutrally with supporting reliable source/s. I don't know why but you removed a source from that article for no reason. -- SMS Talk 18:12, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
Please review your decision of undoing the changes made in Brahumdagh Bugti Wikipedia article
Dear Smsarmad, The changes i made to Brahumdagh Bugti article were not biased and were clearly based on facts which i have cited in the references. I sincerely request you to reverse those changes. Thank You — Preceding unsigned comment added by AbdulBugti (talk • contribs) 10:48, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
- The changes you made were biased. You removed sourced content and added poor/non reliable source also violating the Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy. So they are not going to get restored. -- SMS Talk 16:55, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
i would really appreciate if you could visit this link and add more detail in the history section of article Khyber Pakhtunhawa.
http://pu.edu.pk/images/journal/history/PDF-FILES/chawala.pdf
page 26 3rd paragraph as this seems to be a reliable source. The figure seems to be 15% if you can put that aswell in the section it wouldnt make people think that only 51 percent registered voters voted but in really in the last elections of 1946 only 65 percent of registered voters voted which means there was not a complete turn out. i have edited the article if you think the change seems alrite , you can keep it otherwise you can delete it but this is an authentic source — Preceding unsigned comment added by Saladin1987 (talk • contribs) 12:08, 6 April 2014 (UTC)
khyber pakhtunhawa history section
i would really appreciate if you could visit this link and add more detail in the history section of article Khyber Pakhtunhawa.
http://pu.edu.pk/images/journal/history/PDF-FILES/chawala.pdf
page 26 3rd paragraph as this seems to be a reliable source. The figure seems to be 15% if you can put that aswell in the section it wouldnt make people think that only 51 percent registered voters voted but in really in the last elections of 1946 only 65 percent of registered voters voted which means there was not a complete turn out. i have edited the article if you think the change seems alrite , you can keep it otherwise you can delete it but this is an authentic source — Preceding unsigned comment added by Saladin1987 (talk • contribs) 12:08, 6 April 2014 (UTC)Saladin1987 12:24, 6 April 2014 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Saladin1987 (talk • contribs)
Disambiguation link notification for April 17
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- Mohammad Abdul Ghafoor Hazarvi (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added links pointing to Pir, Mawlawi, Muslim League and North-West Frontier Province
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 17 April 2014 (UTC)
Just have a look on website http://www.jhelum.pk , I have edited becoz which links were there in actual not working. So i replace with working links. You can see and let me know.
Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jhelumpk (talk • contribs) 20:24, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue XCVII, April 2014
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 15:01, 20 April 2014 (UTC)
Re:
Hello Smsarmad
I have read through the Wikipedia rules for external linking and I appreciate your concerns. The blog I linked to is actually considered a major source of information for Pakistani Christians so do you have any further suggestions on the best way to credit this?
Thanks DegoOne (talk) 17:08, 27 April 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 28
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Pakistani people, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Iranian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 28 April 2014 (UTC)