User talk:Smsarmad/Archives/2013/September

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

about meditechAbdel2013 (talk) 16:29, 26 August 2013 (UTC)

hello Sir, i started my page talking about the deference between China meditech equipment and USA meditech, but i found that it has been deleted ,i think its important to know the deference specially that the two companies is popular in their main land, and made many of people around me confused included me on other hand , i found some china companies which its much smaller than meditech equipment and they already in Wikipedia with no problems ! please advice me .. thank you so much in advance abdel Abdel2013 (talk) 16:29, 26 August 2013 (UTC)

(Faisalhussain mohammed (talk) 19:04, 1 September 2013 (UTC)): Good Morning, I am new to Wikipedia and trying to my best to follow the rules and if i am doing any mistake then i am sorry about it, I will try to not repeat the mistakes. Thanking you.


Edit warring complaint

Hi. I don't understand why you have initiated a complaint against me when there does not exist any dispute any more.--Crème3.14159 (talk) 03:34, 2 September 2013 (UTC)

I am not sure what dispute you are referring to, but that was because of you violating WP:3RR. --SMS Talk 03:36, 2 September 2013 (UTC)
As I replied before, I did not break the rule. I only removed a lulu.com link like MrOllie did before [1]. A user had been adding lulu.com (self-publishing website) link and I only followed what is the norm. So, I don't see how it was wrong for me to have removed spam. If you have personal grievances against me, why don't you just let me know instead of doing so much research to have me blocked? --Crème3.14159 (talk) 03:46, 2 September 2013 (UTC)
I seriously don't have any grievances with you. And you should get yourself aware with the 3RR policy. --SMS Talk 03:52, 2 September 2013 (UTC)
Good to know. Is removing a lulu.com (self-publishing website) like others did a violation of policy?--Crème3.14159 (talk) 05:51, 2 September 2013 (UTC)
Yes it was violation of 3RR. --SMS Talk 13:22, 2 September 2013 (UTC)
What is going on here then? School research thesis, I assume? :) [2]--Crème3.14159 (talk) 13:11, 2 September 2013 (UTC)
That is part of my contributions to Wikipedia. --SMS Talk 13:22, 2 September 2013 (UTC)

Sock?

[3] Creampie again? Darkness Shines (talk) 19:13, 4 September 2013 (UTC)

Exactly and not just this. There are some others: ShamsherAhmad, 117.227.16.152 (meat), 204.77.14.153 (proxy). They seem like a duck case to me but I don't know what more evidence CUs want? --SMS Talk 19:29, 4 September 2013 (UTC)
I picked up on the second one a minute ago and filed a report, obvious socking, one adds and self reverts, the other restores it. Darkness Shines (talk) 19:35, 4 September 2013 (UTC)

Re/ Rollback

My apologies(pressed the button by error and keyboard is not working) Sorry---zeeyanwiki discutez 08:54, 5 September 2013 (UTC)

No worries! it happens to all of us. --SMS Talk 13:33, 6 September 2013 (UTC)

Adnan Sami

dont edit mr(adnna Sami)page why r u changing Adnan Sami page again and again, we are publicist of Mr Adnan Sami, please dont try to edit — Preceding unsigned comment added by Deepak rahi (talk • contribs) 13:17, 6 September 2013 (UTC)

In that case you must read Wikipedia's Conflict of Interest guideline. And we go by reliable sources, and if the source says he is Pakistani national, it will be included in the article. --SMS Talk 13:33, 6 September 2013 (UTC)

Battle of Jamrud

You're getting confused with modern-day "Afghan citizen" and the historical Afghans. You're from Pakistan and you should know very well that "Afghan" during Sikh empire did not only refer to citizens of Afghanistan but also to the natives of what is present-day Pakistan. You mentioning "Afghan invasion" makes readers assume that the natives of Peshawar region were Sikhs. Also, there are dozens of reliable sources that clearly mention "Afghan victory." Do I need to list all these sources?--Fareed30 (talk) 13:50, 6 September 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kabul Medical University, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dental (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:31, 9 September 2013 (UTC)

September 2013

Information icon Please do not attack other editors. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. SMS Talk 12:46, 9 September 2013 (UTC)

Are you taking sides or approaching this in an even-handed manner? - You can reply on your own page which I have placed on my watchlist. Tommy Pinball (talk) 12:51, 9 September 2013 (UTC)
Well I am not taking sides and if anyone else violates NPA and comments against you, it doesn't give you a pass to do the same. Besides calling someone Hypocritical prick is a serious violation of NPA and should be avoided in the future. --SMS Talk 16:17, 9 September 2013 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Smsarmad. You have new messages at Seonookim's talk page.
Message added 06:43, 10 September 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Seonookim (What I've done so far) (I'm busy here) (Tell me your requests) 06:43, 10 September 2013 (UTC)

My Edit

Thanks for your notification. I did try to provide links to all the information I posted. From Geo News to the Youtube channel. Could you please guide me on how to do it more accurately. Thanks again. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hafiz Jameel (talk • contribs) 21:45, 13 September 2013 (UTC)

First of all that is too controversial information to be added to a biography article of a living person. So will need reliable sources to support it. Youtube is not a reliable source in this case and you only added link to home page of Geo TV site, not to a specific news report. Besides I suggest you read Wikipedia policy about Biography of Living People (BLP) before any further addition of controversial info. to any BLP article. Happy Editing! --SMS Talk 21:52, 13 September 2013 (UTC)

Ok thanks for the clarification. I will try to get the reliable source before posting again. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hafiz Jameel (talk • contribs) 21:56, 13 September 2013 (UTC)

Files missing description details

Dear uploader: The media files you uploaded as:

are missing a description and/or other details on their image description pages. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the images, and they will be more informative to readers.

If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 16:08, 15 September 2013 (UTC)

titile moved

HI armad you have move the article while the exact name was khaplu khar but it is generally known as khaplu fort You should undo ur edit as you did n,t mentioned any reliable source too.Baltistani (talk) 14:50, 13 September 2013 (UTC)

We here at Wikipedia go by common names while choosing the article title. I have already added five sources in the article that say it Khaplu Palace instead of Khaplu Fort besides there are many else that call it a palace. --SMS Talk 16:34, 13 September 2013 (UTC)
this name is even strange for a native of khaplu like meBaltistani (talk) 13:17, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
It may be but please read the guideline I linked above before any further discussion on this issue. Besides that if you live in Khaplu, you can explain if the fort where Rajas lived prior to construction of Khaplu Khar is still there or not? And what is this "Hachi Khar"? Why the Rajas had two palatial houses at the same time? --SMS Talk 14:34, 16 September 2013 (UTC)

do what u think better Hachi Khar is one of the few relatively well-preserved old houses ruler of Baltistan built in 19th century.The building is no longer inhabited by members of the former ruling family and decays. It is hoped that this castle-like building is saved from the final decay.Baltistani (talk) 07:34, 17 September 2013 (UTC)

WikiProject Military history coordinator election

Greetings from WikiProject Military history! As a member of the project, you are invited to take part in our annual project coordinator election, which will determine our coordinators for the next twelve months. If you wish to cast a vote, please do so on the election page by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September! Kirill [talk] 17:12, 16 September 2013 (UTC)

Khaplu Palace

Hi Smsarmad, I just wanted to show my appreciation for the work you did on Khaplu Palace. I had the article on my watchlist since I removed a copyvio from it. You greatly expanded the article and provided some nice pictures. You might wish to nominate it for DYK. Good job! Crispulop (talk) 13:33, 18 September 2013 (UTC)

Thank you Crispulop. Your message is really very encouraging. I have nominated a fact from the article at DYK. --SMS Talk 16:42, 18 September 2013 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXXXXX, September 2013

Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 00:54, 21 September 2013 (UTC)

Your sockpuppet report (Enlightinggemini) — more info needed ASAP

Hi. I'm one of the clerks at Sockpuppet Investigations (SPI). You filed an SPI request about ten hours ago (Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Enlightinggemini), but you named only the suspected sockmaster (Enlightinggemini), and not any suspected sockpuppet(s). Without at least one suspected sockpuppet, it is impossible to investigate anything.

I would also strongly advise you to include specific diffs clearly illustrating the misbehaviour which you believe points to sockpuppetry — at least one diff from the sockmaster, and at least one from each sockpuppet. Finally, please remember that merely using multiple accounts is not always sockpuppetry; be sure to read / re-read WP:SOCK and make it clear what it is about the activity you are reporting that constitutes the improper use of multiple accounts as laid out in the policy.

Please deal with this issue ASAP, or else your SPI report will have to be deleted with no action taken. — Richwales (no relation to Jimbo) 05:34, 22 September 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MyBank for example

What template do you use to tag confirmed sockpuppets in these discussions? I can't find it in any of the usual spots. Thanks. --| Uncle Milty | talk | 17:04, 25 September 2013 (UTC)

I also tried but couldn't find one so wrote that myself. Now that you have asked for it, I will create one. Will let you know once it is done. --SMS Talk 17:28, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
Here you go: {{Csp}} --SMS Talk 19:47, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
Very awesome. Thank you. --| Uncle Milty | talk | 23:42, 25 September 2013 (UTC)

Tehwaar Calendars

Hello smsarmad, do not try to Redirect articles as you did in Tehwaar Calendar of Pakistan 2013 and [Tehwaar Calendar of Pakistan 2014]]. This is your last warning. Enough is enough, if you try once more, then your account will expire on or after 5th October 2013 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Abcd13.abcd (talk • contribs) 16:29, 26 September 2013 (UTC)

I have already explained the issue on your talk, kindly take a look at it calmly. --SMS Talk 16:40, 26 September 2013 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Smsarmad/Archives/2013/September&oldid=1144765883"