User talk:Smsarmad/Archives/2009/January
 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
You've uploaded File:Midshipman Pak Navy.gif, and indicated that it's used under Wikipedia's rules for non-free images. However, it's not presently used in any articles. Wikipedia policy requires that non-free images be either used or deleted, so if this image isn't used in an article in the next week, it will be deleted.
This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 08:38, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on File:Midshipman Pak Navy.gif requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:File:Midshipman Pak Navy.gif|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. SMS Talk 19:52, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on File:Midshipman Pak Navy.gif requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:File:Midshipman Pak Navy.gif|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. SMS Talk 19:54, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXIV (December 2008)
The December 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 04:51, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
Cited Information
Did you know that you undid cited information regarding american sportspeople in doping cases?71.255.64.224 (talk) 00:49, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
India-Pakistan War 1947
I noticed that you edited the above page to show the percentage's occupied by Pakistan versus India. However, I note that you have used the total area of Jammu & Kashmir as per the Wikipedia page. However, this is incorrect as it shows the TOTAL area of the state of Jammu & Kashmir including the areas now occupied by China and Pakistan. I have corrected to show the numbers as I believe them to be correct. Details are also given on the discussion page. --Trevor Bassett (talk) 18:28, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
PAF table
my pleasure. the old one was pretty outdated. Cheese1125 (talk) 02:36, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
Need explanation
You have mentioned:
"Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of previously published material to our articles as you apparently did to Hamid Mir."
Can you kindly specify exactly where these violations were made by me. So that i may correct them and avoid them in future. NewsForAll (talk) 06:39, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
Could you tell me how Quaid-e-Azam's 11th August speech, which can be verified from any where is "unsourced"? Learn to accept dissenting point of views. If you keep up your reverts on the Jinnah page, I will report you for rv and edit war 221.132.117.17 (talk) 17:07, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
I have protected the article for one week. Please see my message to all concerned editors on the article's talk page. GbT/c 11:50, 31 January 2009 (UTC)