User talk:Smooth alligator

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Smooth alligator, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! RFD (talk) 19:12, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Wall Southwick) has been reviewed![edit]

Thanks for creating Wall Southwick, Smooth alligator!

Wikipedia editor Salimfadhley just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Can you find ways to add depth to this article? Is Wall Southwick only known for this one act? Is there anything else we can add to the article?

To reply, leave a comment on Salimfadhley's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Salimfadhley (talk) 22:06, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Joseph Smith presidential campaign, 1844[edit]

Hello! Your submission of Joseph Smith presidential campaign, 1844 at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Johnbod (talk) 13:49, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Solomon Copeland[edit]

The article Solomon Copeland has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. ~**_mustafarox_**~ (talk) 22:47, 18 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Joseph Smith presidential campaign, 1844[edit]

On 25 August 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Joseph Smith presidential campaign, 1844, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that in 1844, Latter Day Saints founder Joseph Smith became the first Mormon to run for President of the United States and the first American presidential candidate to be assassinated? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Joseph Smith presidential campaign, 1844. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Joseph Smith presidential campaign, 1844), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Alex Shih ^Talk 00:02, 25 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Structural libertarianism[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Structural libertarianism requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from econlog.econlib.org/archives/2009/01/policy_all_the.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 22:00, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

October 2017[edit]

Your addition to Neocameralism has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. This is your final warning. Further copyright violations will result in you being blocked from editing. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 01:01, 14 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Michael Anissimov[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Michael Anissimov requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. reddogsix (talk) 20:52, 14 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 15[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Dark Enlightenment, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Marginal Revolution and Richard Spencer (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:45, 15 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Sagebrush cricket) has been reviewed![edit]

Thanks for creating Sagebrush cricket, Smooth alligator!

Wikipedia editor SamHolt6 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Reviewed, more sources would be welcome.

To reply, leave a comment on SamHolt6's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

SamHolt6 (talk) 14:27, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Kevin Wilshaw[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Kevin Wilshaw requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. 192.76.8.66 (talk) 12:12, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Self-published sources[edit]

Hello. Please review WP:RS. Books printed through Lulu Press (and similar print on demand platforms) are not generally regarded as reliable, as they are self-published sources. Thanks. Grayfell (talk) 08:49, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

		The Original Barnstar
		For your extraordinary work on neoreactionary related political articles, especially Dark Enlightenment. -Ad Orientem (talk) 02:00, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

October 2017[edit]

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

— Berean Hunter (talk) 19:00, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Smooth alligator (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Pursuant to WP:IAR, I ask for an unblock on grounds that my recent behavior has been productive and that being allowed to edit will allow me to improve the encyclopedia. Smooth alligator (talk) 19:18, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

A globally locked account cannot be unblocked locally. See below for what to do. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 21:29, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Are you Leucosticte?
— Berean Hunter (talk) 20:01, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This account is now globally locked and the above request should be declined. This person may appeal by email to ~~the Arbitration committee~~.
— Berean Hunter (talk) 20:43, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Correction: You may appeal by email to ca@wikimedia.org
— Berean Hunter (talk) 22:57, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Smooth, I don't know what your history is but you need to work this out with the powers that be. If asked I will vouch that what editing I saw from you was legit, though I don't know how far that will go. In the meantime please don't make this situation worse by socking or editing as an IP. -Ad Orientem (talk) 00:32, 31 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I see from the SPI that you had multiple accounts running. I fear that it will be a longtime, years, before you will be able to request a WP:SO with any hope of it being seriously entertained. That said I have seen banned editors come back after a multi year wait. If there is hope it will certainly require that you refrain from socking. The ball is in your court. -Ad Orientem (talk) 00:42, 31 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Dark Enlightenment sidebar[edit]

Template:Dark Enlightenment sidebar has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. power~enwiki (π, ν) 04:07, 31 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Male expendability[edit]

Hello Smooth alligator,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Male expendability for deletion because the article appears to be about something that you or someone you know personally invented, coined, or discovered, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important—that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

^{Atsme📞📧} 03:20, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Rosie Gray for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rosie Gray is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rosie Gray until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Athene cunicularia (talk) 11:45, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Male expendability for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Male expendability is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Male expendability until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Orange Mike | Talk 17:33, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Alt-right footer/citations[edit]

Template:Alt-right footer/citations has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 20:41, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Pronomian" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

The redirect Pronomian has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone who is not blocked or banned from Wikipedia is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 15 § Pronomian until a consensus is reached. Bwrs (talk) 22:28, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Pronomianism" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

The redirect Pronomianism has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone who is not blocked or banned from Wikipedia is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 15 § Pronomianism until a consensus is reached. Bwrs (talk) 22:28, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]