User talk:Slatersteven/Archives/2017/September

Hello! There is a DR/N request you may have interest in.

This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! Hidden Tempo (talk) 01:29, 26 July 2017 (UTC)

Rosy

RE: this, the WP:BURDEN is on you, not me. You probably should be made aware of the following:

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

- Sitush (talk) 10:36, 30 July 2017 (UTC)

And you should try reading the sources we already have in the article before posting this.Slatersteven (talk) 10:38, 30 July 2017 (UTC)

Also maybe you should learn form the past and bother to look for sources before deleting arterial [1]

And by the way, I do fulfill burden as it was sourced to an RS.Slatersteven (talk) 13:19, 30 July 2017 (UTC)

So that's another one you do not understand - WP:BURDEN. Astonishing. - Sitush (talk) 04:03, 31 July 2017 (UTC)

Well perhaps then (rather then making snide comments) you would care to point out how a properly cited quote failed burden?Slatersteven (talk) 08:23, 31 July 2017 (UTC)

Learn italian and meaning of words

Before than reverting.Benniejets (talk) 17:45, 5 August 2017 (UTC)

So what is the Italian for La Spezia?Slatersteven (talk) 17:47, 5 August 2017 (UTC)

go to read they are verifiable.In La Spezia article is reported that there's Italian navy arsenal.Thanks.Benniejets (talk) 17:51, 5 August 2017 (UTC)

Please provide the quote form the Tisclai article that mentions La Spezia, I have looked and cannot find any mention of it.Slatersteven (talk) 17:54, 5 August 2017 (UTC)

I deleted La Spezia and tricastin part.I'm sure there are edits about Tricastin and exchanges by train of fissile products between Trino Vercellese(Italy) and France in '60s.Benniejets (talk) 18:04, 5 August 2017 (UTC)

Could you now provide the part where the Tiscali source says that it is common knowledge that Italy stores it's own nuclear weapons?, as I can only finds reference to Italy storing other peoples.Slatersteven (talk) 18:07, 5 August 2017 (UTC)

People think so in Italy but if you like i'll delete it .It'd need reference as you ask.You are right.Benniejets (talk) 18:18, 5 August 2017 (UTC)

Yes, it needs an RS to support inclusion..Slatersteven (talk) 18:21, 5 August 2017 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXXXVI, August 2017

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 on the Battle of Messines and recent Australian Army leadership; Nick-D on South African armour Op-ed: Nick-D talks photography Timeline: This month in World War I

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 13:38, 7 August 2017 (UTC)

White House's Ukraine comments

Hi! Have you had time to review the New York Times story we were discussing at NPOV noticeboard? Or do you need help finding the right passage? Politrukki (talk) 14:36, 19 August 2017 (UTC)