User talk:Slatersteven/Archives/2017/July

Hello! There is a DR/N request you may have interest in.

This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the WP:DRN regarding dispute resolution. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. The thread is "Talk:Pizzagate conspiracy_theory#Spirit_cooking_and_leaked_FBI_document".The discussion is about the topic Pizzagate. Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! --Terrorist96 (talk) 18:55, 29 April 2017 (UTC)

Hello, from a DR/N volunteer

This is a friendly reminder to involved parties that there is a current Dispute Resolution Noticeboard case still awaiting comments and replies. If this dispute has been resolved to the satisfaction of the filing editor and all involved parties, please take a moment to add a note about this at the discussion so that a volunteer may close the case as "Resolved". If the dispute is still ongoing, please add your input. Yashovardhan (talk) 05:04, 2 May 2017 (UTC)

typos and bigotry, seriously?

You clearly have the ability to spell. I made what was clearly an inoffensive joke about what was apparently (and I only say "apparently" because your response hinged on the assertion that you really didn't know the difference between "past" and "paste") a typo to try and lighten the mood. Responding by implicitly accusing me of bigotry is so far beyond the pale that I really don't know how to address it beyond pointing out how uncalled for and irrational it is. I've collapsed the discussion. You are, of course, free to open it back up and continue along the same tact, but I strongly recommend against it. ᛗᛁᛟᛚᚾᛁᚱPants Tell me all about it. 16:31, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

Really? You think that I can spell? I suggest you read what I have written again, or would you like me to give a few examples?.Yes by the way, I do believe that mocking (not matter how "inoffensive") literacy is bigotry. It is the hate that can still shout it's name from the roof tops "LOL look at the moron!", maybe you did not intend to do this. That is irrelevant often an offensive comment comes not out of genuine bigotry, but ignorance ,this is not defense. Poor literacy is a real (and recognized) medical condition (well many in fact). By the way just because it was a typo does not mean the cause is not an issue with illiteracy, it is the fact you cannot see the typo that causes it (such as relying overly on spellchecker). I have also noted you tend to mock people you are in disagreement with [1], so no my reaction was not uncalled for and irrational, ass it fits firmly with a pattern of ridiculing disrespect you clearly hold for anyone whose intelligence you consider wanting. You made a joke with out bothering to think how that joke might impact upon the target, when there may have been genuine medical reasons for the act you mocked. I reacted as anyone might who felt they were being mocked for something they cannot control. Maybe if you do not want to give offence maybe you should think about what you are writing before writing it. After all, look how you are offended by being banded a bigot (which I did not, I said I saw no difference between mocking one disability and another), now imagine if this was a genuine mental illness and not just ignorance. Imagine you could not control it?Slatersteven (talk) 16:49, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

ROFLMAO You are so full of shit. Tell you what. Why don't you post that example to ANI and see how far that gets you? Seriously. It's right here. Good luck. ᛗᛁᛟᛚᚾᛁᚱPants Tell me all about it. 21:09, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXXXIII, May 2017

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 on Strategic Air Command doctrine Op-ed: Tomstar81 looks at a little-known aspect of World War I Timeline: This month in World War I

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 03:02, 7 May 2017 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXXXIV, June 2017

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 looks at the Battle of Kokoda and US defence acquisition in the 1960s Op-ed: Hawkeye7 on the Battle of Messines Timeline: This month in World War I

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:52, 8 June 2017 (UTC)

stay off my talk page

thanks.

Fair enough, if you do not want help in how to avoid a block your call.Slatersteven (talk) 16:45, 15 June 2017 (UTC)

@68.117.92.91: I did warn you.Slatersteven (talk) 09:33, 16 June 2017 (UTC)

@68.117.92.91: It is your tone (and your request for unblock continues that tone) that got you the block, and no your comments were not blanked, they are still there.Slatersteven (talk) 12:48, 16 June 2017 (UTC)

@68.117.92.91: I did warn you.Slatersteven (talk) 09:32, 26 June 2017 (UTC)

Sourcing for Black Rose Anarchist Federation Entry

Slatersteven the sources do not reference Black Rose Anarchist Federation (BRRN) because at the time the sources were written the organization had not been founded. Cali1155 (talk) 15:57, 29 June 2017 (UTC)

Cali1155 So then they cannot be used for information about them, as they did not exist.Slatersteven (talk) 15:59, 29 June 2017 (UTC)