User talk:Skinssnapper

I have been hired to edit the page of James Stunt by a manager of this person. I am not being paid to promote this article. I am being paid to bring the article to wikipedia standards as the notable person does not want to violate wikipedia policies that other editors have caused on his article as wikipedia violations. Therefore, I have minimal conflict of interest because I have been hired to find the correct wikipedia policies and try to correct the article to abide by them even if it means rewriting the article and removing bad text. I will still try to get other wikipedia editors edit the article instead of doing myself where ever possible.

I also declare that I am an independent writer who is not related to any other paid editor or account on wikipedia. I am a professional writer. I am new, but I do not intend to violate wikipedia policies so if you think I may have violated one, please let me know.

I shall be looking forward to making wikipedia a better place.

Edits that are not related to James stunt are not paid and are my own way of giving something back to wikipedia for free.

Skinssnapper (talk) 06:25, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation[edit]

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Khocon, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

SmartSE (talk) 21:28, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

December 2015[edit]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Bbb23 (talk) 02:21, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]