User talk:Sjzaslaw

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Welcome!

Hello, Sjzaslaw, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to leave me a message or place "{{helpme}}" on this page and someone will drop by to help. — goethean 16:47, 26 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

____

Thank you! Sjzaslaw (talk) 20:13, 26 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: University of California High-Performance AstroComputing Center (2) (January 11)[edit]

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! TKK! bark with me! 00:55, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I've added references to the University of California news website and the Santa Cruz Sentinel newspaper article in case you doubt the existence of the center. There is also a reference from UC San Diego, a separate campus. I can refer you to secondary sources that document work done by the center, document the existence of the authors and give their affiliations,Sjzaslaw (talk) 05:02, 11 January 2014 (UTC) but they do not concern the center itself.[reply]

Can you tell me what doubts you have that need to be addressed? There is very little in secondary references about the center. If you look at another article I've submitted documenting the work of the center, you can see that the work has been written up in Sky and Telescope and IEEE Spectrum and papers published in peer-reviewed journals. Thanks for your help. -- Steve Zaslaw

Here are some other references that mention the center although they are not about the center: A bunch show up in Scholar. A number show up in Google Book SearchSjzaslaw (talk) 05:00, 11 January 2014 (UTC).[reply]

By way of disclosure, and as stated in the text of the article under consideration, I am the webmaster for the University of California High-Performance AstroComputing Center. Sjzaslaw (talk) 05:48, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at AfC Bolshoi Cosmological Simulation was accepted[edit]

Bolshoi Cosmological Simulation, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Chris1834 (talk) 00:30, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

New Articles[edit]

Yes you can just create articles without using AFC. Every new article that gets published to mainspace is marked as new until an editor reviews it, even the article I approved goes through the new article process. This keeps major issues and copyright violations from becoming problems. Everyone is encouraged to add to Wikipedia as much as they want as long as they are notable entries. Thanks for contributing! Chris1834 (talk) 02:42, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at AfC University of California High-Performance AstroComputing Center (2) was accepted[edit]

University of California High-Performance AstroComputing Center (2), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Chris1834 (talk) 03:14, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Approved and fixed[edit]

Yes...it is easier for me to just approve it, so I did. As for the name, I should have fixed that when I approved it but I missed it. I just went and moved it. Thanks for letting me know.Chris1834 (talk) 03:25, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 13[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bolshoi Cosmological Simulation, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page NSF (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:42, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed.Sjzaslaw (talk) 15:08, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Project AGORA[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Project AGORA requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://news.ucsc.edu/2013/12/agora-project.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. VQuakr (talk) 06:15, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Can you explain what you need? I can access the deleted text, but I can't restore copyright material (which you can see on the original website anyway). If you just want the References, External links etc, I can do that for you Jimfbleak - talk to me? 17:04, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Permission has now been granted to reproduce press release[edit]

Here is a record of my correspondence with the copyright holder in which he gives permission for its reuse:

From: Tim Stephens <stephens@ucsc.edu> Date: Monday, February 10, 2014 at 8:25 AM To: Steve Zaslaw <sjZaslaw@gmail.com> Cc: "Trudy E. Bell" <trudy_e_bell@sbcglobal.net>, <pioweb@ucsc.edu>, Joel Primack <joel@ucsc.edu> Subject: Re: Permission to use contents of UCSC Press Releases

Hi Steve,

The policy of the UCSC Public Affairs Office is that we are fine with our press releases being reproduced in other media, in whole or in part. It happens regularly--in fact, there are a number of web sites that seem to derive all of their "news" from university press releases. The copyright line at the bottom of the page appears automatically on all of the UCSC web pages (top level and secondary pages, from the campus home page on down). But when a press release is distributed to the media the intent is for others to use it.

That said, Wikipedia does have an explicit policy regarding use of press releases: " Occasionally, the question is raised about the copyright status of press releases. While press releases are by nature intended to be reproduced widely, there is no inherent permission to alter them or create derivative works based on them, or to use them for commercial purposes. Accordingly, press releases are handled like other copyrighted content. In the absence of explicit disclaimer or permission, these may not be freely reproduced." (from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:FAQ/Copyright)

Therefore, I hereby give you explicit permission to use all or selected parts of the project AGORA press release (http://news.ucsc.edu/2013/12/agora-project.html) for your Wikipedia article. Hope this helps.

- Tim

From: Steve Zaslaw [1] Sent: Saturday, February 8, 2014 12:37 PM To: pioweb@ucsc.edu; stephens@ucsc.edu Cc: Joel Primack; Trudy E. Bell Subject: Permission to use contents of UCSC Press Releases

Hello,

I created a Wikipedia article titled Project AGORA at the behest of Prof. Joel Primack. However, the article was deleted from the encyclopedia due to claims of infringement of the copyrights of the University of California. These claims were made by an editor of Wikipedia (Jimfbleak (talk | contribs) ), and not to my knowledge by someone associated with UC.

I used some text verbatim from the press release, but credited the sources. Therefore, since, if I understood it, the goal of such a release is to propagate the information, I assumed that the University would not consider this a copyright infringement. Contrariwise, it is stated at the bottom of the press release: “©2014 REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.” Therefore, I would like to know what is the policy of University in reproducing some sections of the text, with footnoted credit, and, if in fact the policy permits such use, where it is so stated.

Thank you for your time and consideration.

Steve Zaslaw Webmaster UC-HiPACC

-- Tim Stephens

University Relations/Communications

University of California, Santa Cruz

1156 High Street

Santa Cruz, CA 95064

ph: 831-459-4352

Informal review[edit]

I have posted some comments about your AGORA draft article at User talk:Sjzaslaw/sandbox#Informal review comments. --Hroðulf (or Hrothulf) (Talk) 10:29, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't add new material to University of California High-Performance AstroComputing Center[edit]

Thank you kindly for disclosing that your employer is University of California High-Performance AstroComputing Center. Also thanks for submitting this and related articles as drafts, which minimizes conflict of interest problems. It is great to have your expertise here at Wikipedia.

Please refrain from editing that article except to correct defamation and other uncontroversial errors.

To do otherwise can be harmful to both your employer's reputation and the integrity of the encyclopedia.

Instead, please recommend improvements to published articles that relate to your employer at article talk pages, and in article drafts, disclosing your affiliation.

Wikipedia's community guideline on this topic is

and there is also a discussion about a proposed change to the Terms of Use at

I hope that helps.

--Hroðulf (or Hrothulf) (Talk) 11:06, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Question about request for me to refrain from edits to articles I've contributed as paid consultant to interested party[edit]

I note that in the proposal for disclosure of affiliation of paid contributors, we see this example, at https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Terms_of_use/Paid_contributions_amendment#How_should_I_disclose_paid_contributions_in_my_edit_summary.3F :

'You may represent your employer, affiliation, and client in the edit summary box before you “save” your edit or contribution. For example, before saving your edits to a Wikipedia article about your client, Jordan Smith, you may write this note in the edit summary box: “Jordan Smith has hired me to update their Wikipedia article” or “I work for Jordan Smith.”'

Implicit in this, it seems to me, is the legitimacy of such an edit given the requisite disclosure. Thus, I ask, is this consonant with the request that I refrain from further edits to my articles? I would like to be able to make such disclosed edits.

I do not claim not to have conflicts of interest; that is implicit. Although my contributions to Wikipedia may well stand to be improved, and perhaps they show insider prejudice, I believe I am adding value without promoting commercial or political interests or shading the truth to fit an agenda beyond the transmittal of useful information for the general benefit of readers. Thank you for considering my comments.Sjzaslaw (talk) 18:23, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation : AGORA High-Resolution Galaxy Simulations Comparison Project[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Thank you for your
contributions to Wikipedia!
  • Please remember to link to the submission!
Hroðulf (or Hrothulf) (Talk) 19:07, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I wrote more detail at User talk:Hroðulf#Thank you for your comments on my draft of the Project AGORA article and UC-HiPACC article

--Hroðulf (or Hrothulf) (Talk) 19:07, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

As a comparison for your interest, Sophie software had a peer-reviewed paper accepted by an IEEE journal, but with no citations or independent coverage, its Wikipedia article was deleted in 2008.
Now, in 2014, I hope to make a case to reinstate it.
--Hroðulf (or Hrothulf) (Talk) 19:19, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

My Affiliation and Contribution History to Date[edit]

I am a contractor for the University of California, Santa Cruz (UCSC), and, specifically, I am contracted to be the webmaster for the University of California High-Performance AstroComputing Center (UC-HiPACC), which is headquartered at UCSC. In this capacity, I contributed to Wikipedia the articles on UC-HiPACC, and on the Bolshoi Cosmological Simulation. I have written a draft of an article on "Project AGORA." Publication in Wikipedia of same has been declined.Sjzaslaw (talk) 17:49, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/AGORA High-Resolution Galaxy Simulations Comparison Project concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/AGORA High-Resolution Galaxy Simulations Comparison Project, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:30, 5 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/AGORA High-Resolution Galaxy Simulations Comparison Project[edit]

Hello Sjzaslaw. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "AGORA High-Resolution Galaxy Simulations Comparison Project".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/AGORA High-Resolution Galaxy Simulations Comparison Project}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 14:02, 6 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/AGORA High-Resolution Galaxy Simulations Comparison Project-talk[edit]

Hello Sjzaslaw. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "AGORA High-Resolution Galaxy Simulations Comparison Project-talk".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/AGORA High-Resolution Galaxy Simulations Comparison Project-talk}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. EoRdE6(Come Talk to Me!) 23:01, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:04, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Sjzaslaw&oldid=1143310302"