User talk:Singtruth

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

In response to your feedback[edit]

Really? I see the reflist just fine on your article that you're editing.

Abigail was here :D Talk to Me. Email Me. 02:35, 31 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

 


Welcome to Wikipedia! Drop by the Teahouse anytime for a cup of tea, or some help with editing![edit]

Teahouse logo
Hello! Singtruth, you are invited to join other new editors and friendly hosts in the Teahouse. An awesome place to meet people, ask questions and learn more about Wikipedia. Please join us! Sarah (talk) 17:19, 1 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

November 2012[edit]

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Lee Kuan Yew. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Please stop your edit war at Lee Kuan Yew. WP is not a soapbox, keep that in mind. Continuing reverting and you will get blocked. Bonkers The Clown (talk) 14:40, 9 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Lee Kuan Yew shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Shrigley (talk) 20:58, 9 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion[edit]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Shrigley (talk) 02:42, 10 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for edit-warring, POV-pushing, and refusal to collaborate. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Bbb23 (talk) 14:07, 10 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]