User talk:Shemsher2.o
Hello, Shemsher2.o, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like this place and decide to stay.
- Please sign your name on talk pages, by using four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically produce your username and the date, and helps to identify who said what and when. Please do not sign any edit that is not on a talk page.
- Check out some of these pages:
- If you have a question that is not one of the frequently asked questions below, check out the Teahouse, ask me on my talk page, or click the button below. Happy editing and again, welcome! Rasnaboy (talk) 06:48, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
Why can't I edit some particular pages?
Some pages that have been vandalized repeatedly are semi-protected, meaning that editing by new or unregistered users is prohibited through technical measures. If you have an account that is four days old and has made at least 10 edits, then you can bypass semi-protection and edit any semi-protected page. Some pages, such as highly visible templates, are fully-protected, meaning that only administrators can edit them. If this is not the case, you may have been blocked or your IP address caught up in a range block.
Where can I experiment with editing Wikipedia?
Use the main sandbox or create your own personal sandbox to experiment.
How do I create an article?
See how to create your first article, then use the Article Wizard to create one, and add references to the article as explained below.
How do I create citations?
- Do a search on Google or your preferred search engine for the subject of the Wikipedia article that you want to create a citation for.
- Find a website that supports the claim you are trying to find a citation for.
- In a new tab/window, go to the citation generator, click on the 'An arbitrary website' bubble, and fill out as many fields as you can about the website you just found.
- Click the 'Get reference wiki text' button.
- Highlight, and then copy (Ctrl+C or Apple+C), the resulting text (it will be something like
<ref> {{cite web | .... }}</ref>, copy the whole thing). - In the Wikipedia article, after the claim you found a citation for, paste (Ctrl+V or Apple+V) the text you copied.
- If the article does not have a References or Notes section (or the like), add this to the bottom of the page, but above the External Links section and the categories:
==References==
{{Reflist}}
What is a WikiProject, and how do I join one?
A WikiProject is a group of editors that are interested in improving the coverage of certain topics on Wikipedia. (See this page for a complete list of WikiProjects.) If you would like to help, add your username to the list that is on the bottom of the WikiProject page.
- @Rasnaboy thanks for being so welcoming and thanks for the fruits especially đâ¤ď¸ Shemsher2.o (talk) 10:07, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
- @Rasnaboy Hello sir, I here with a problem. I would like to ask if it's okay to disrespect others just because they think differently? cause User:Fylindfotberserk clearly thinks it's okay. He called the previous editor of "Dhak (instrument)" dumb. I also think his edits includes self promotion. I am sorry if I am overreacting or disrupting your busy schedule with a silly question, but I personally don't like to get called that, I do have self respect. Shemsher2.o (talk) 00:16, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
- No, they said "dummy edit", which doesn't mean what you may think it means. And "self-promotion", I don't know how that applies to this edit. I am going to revert it: I have no reason to believe that that book is less reliable than that newspaper article. Drmies (talk) 00:21, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
- @Drmies Oh okay,thank you so much. đ I'm feeling kinda embarrassed now misunderstanding to something else. I'm still new here so it's kinda hard to learn all the phrases, I just did for the good of Wikipedia and thank you so much for making time for replying me, again I am so sorry. đ Shemsher2.o (talk) 00:31, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
- No problem: we all have to learn each other's idiom in this global community. But here's the thing: I had to revert you because I don't think that website/newspaper article was better than the book. If you disagree, you can explain why on the article talk page. User:Fylindfotberserk, whom I know as an experienced and helpful editor, can address the point, I'm sure. Thanks, Drmies (talk) 00:34, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
- @Drmies Surely! My apology sir. I'll try my best to search for better source to prove my point, but for now, as User:Fylindfotberserk is more experienced editor, now I have no fear of letting the article getting controlled by this helpful editor. I owe you and User:Fylindfotberserk an apology. Thank you. Shemsher2.o (talk) 00:45, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
- No problem: we all have to learn each other's idiom in this global community. But here's the thing: I had to revert you because I don't think that website/newspaper article was better than the book. If you disagree, you can explain why on the article talk page. User:Fylindfotberserk, whom I know as an experienced and helpful editor, can address the point, I'm sure. Thanks, Drmies (talk) 00:34, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
- @Drmies Oh okay,thank you so much. đ I'm feeling kinda embarrassed now misunderstanding to something else. I'm still new here so it's kinda hard to learn all the phrases, I just did for the good of Wikipedia and thank you so much for making time for replying me, again I am so sorry. đ Shemsher2.o (talk) 00:31, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
- No, they said "dummy edit", which doesn't mean what you may think it means. And "self-promotion", I don't know how that applies to this edit. I am going to revert it: I have no reason to believe that that book is less reliable than that newspaper article. Drmies (talk) 00:21, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
November 2023[edit]
Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice:
Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped. Drmies (talk) 01:58, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice:
{{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.