User talk:Sharonabc19

This is Sharonabc19's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ingrasys Technology (July 13)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This draft is written from the viewpoint of the company, focusing on what the company says about itself. Corporate notability is based on what independent reliable sources have written about the subject.

Not every business corporation is notable, and this draft does not establish corporate notability. You may ask for advice about corporate notability at the Teahouse.

Does the author of this draft have any sort of financial or other connection with the subject of this draft? Please read the conflict of interest policy and the paid editing policy and make any required disclosures.

You may ask for advice about conflict of interest at the Teahouse.

If this draft is resubmitted without addressing the question about conflict of interest, it may be Rejected or nominated for deletion.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ingrasys Technology and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Ingrasys Technology, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 06:04, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Sharonabc19! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 06:04, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Ingrasys Technology has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Ingrasys Technology. Thanks! Greenman (talk) 20:55, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Greenman,

Thank you very much for your advice. Can I just add the following on the top of Ingrasys wiki page to disclose a COI and it is good to go for approval?

The following Wikipedia contributor has declared a personal or professional connection to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.

Sharonabc19 (talk · contribs) This user has declared a connection. ((Optional) Insert relevant affiliations, disclosures, article drafts or diffs showing COI contributions.)

Sharonabc19 (talk) 02:40, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

or by adding "I am personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article." in the edit summary of Ingrasys wiki page? Sharonabc19 (talk) 02:50, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Paid editing[edit]

As previously advised, your edits give the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. You were asked to cease editing until you responded by either stating that you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits, or by complying with the mandatory requirements under the Wikimedia Terms of Use that you disclose your employer, client and affiliation. Again, you can post such a disclosure on your user page at User:Sharonabc19, and the template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Sharonabc19|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. Please respond before making any other edits to Wikipedia. Theroadislong (talk) 08:21, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Theroadislong for your valuable feedback. Can you kindly tell me which part of the article sounds like advertisement? So I can rewrite it based on your opinion. Is it because of the sources I cited or the article focuses on the product mainly? Cheers. Sharonabc19 (talk) 08:30, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ingrasys Technology (July 25)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ingrasys Technology and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 08:22, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

paid editing again[edit]

As previously advised, your edits give the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. You were asked to cease editing until you responded by either stating that you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits, or by complying with the mandatory requirements under the Wikimedia Terms of Use that you disclose your employer, client and affiliation. Again, you can post such a disclosure on your user page at User:Sharonabc19, and the template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Sharonabc19|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. Please respond before making any other edits to Wikipedia. Theroadislong (talk) 08:34, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Theroadislong. I actually do not get paid for writing this. I apologize if you feel I ignore your paid editing comment. Based from your "If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies", I would be really appreciated if you could provide me some suggestions about which part of the article goes wrong. I hope my explanation makes sense. Cheers again. Sharonabc19 (talk) 09:10, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Paid applies to more than just "writing this." If you are paid or in any way compensated by the company, even if not assigned or asked to create a Wikipedia article, that equals PAID. If you have a personel connection to the coompany that is considered a conflict of interest, and warrents a statement on your User page. See WP:COI for rules. David notMD (talk) 04:36, 28 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi David, thank you so much for your explanation. I actually just write a company I heard before. I think it is because I followed some company templates to write this, but now they are on the list of Articles for deletion (surprisingly found this yesterday).

I am wondering with a disclosed COI on my user page, my article is now good to go for acceptance without any revision, or do I still need to rewrite? Thank you. Sharonabc19 (talk) 01:00, 29 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived[edit]

Hi Sharonabc19! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Help for reviewing my draft, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.

See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 28 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ingrasys draft[edit]

If submitted again, this will be Declined again. Most of the refs are press releases about Ingrasys products. The Locations and Facilities section should be deleted. What is lacking are references which are - at length - about Ingrasys. From your replies above, not clear to me if you are stating that you have a COI or not. If yes, state that on your User page. If no, make that clear here on your Talk page. David notMD (talk) 07:19, 29 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived[edit]

Hi Sharonabc19! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Need advice from a reviewer, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.

See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 31 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Ingrasys Technology[edit]

Hello, Sharonabc19. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Ingrasys Technology, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:02, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Ingrasys Technology[edit]

Hello, Sharonabc19. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Ingrasys Technology".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:12, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]