User talk:Shadowsill

Flagging Krocodylus for further review[edit]

Hello, Shadowsill … I recently encountered the article about Krocodylus and in my opinion, it either lacks sufficient Attribution that it satisfies the Notability criteria for Films, or it may violate the Conflict of interest guideline, or perhaps it violates a copyright.

I have created this initial entry on your Talk page because you are either the original author of the article, or else a recent contributor to it; I will leave more detailed information regarding my specific concerns about the article on its Discussion page … please respond either there or on this Talk page, instead of on my Talk page, in order to avoid fragmenting the conversation.

Be sure to read Ownership of articles, and remember that other editors may not share your opinion about the notability of the article's subject.

I do not mean to imply that your contribution is unappreciated … perhaps you should read Your first article … and remember, there was a time when I knew less about how Wikipedia works than you know right now, and I am always available to help you become a more proactive contributor. Happy Editing! — 72.75.78.69 (talk · contribs) _{15:20, 24 May 2008 (UTC)}[reply]

Proposed deletion of Krocodylus[edit]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Krocodylus, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice?

Happy Editing! — 72.75.78.69 (talk · contribs) _{16:17, 25 May 2008 (UTC)}[reply]

Thanks[edit]

For stopping by and commenting on my comment! Hope it didn't come across as a lecture or a slap on the wrist - I hate it myself when someone on here thinks they should educate other users. Happy editing Dick G (talk) 05:50, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

wow[edit]

You're amazing. You follow me around and change my edits. Good for you! Keep up the good work! --Slyder Pilot 19:33, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'd also like to add that it's generally not acceptable to blank your talk page. Since this is the case, I'll bring back what you blanked. --Slyder Pilot 19:33, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Join in[edit]

It seems we finaly have a real discussion. here. Not bad links were given. If your interested, enter it. Log in, log out (talk) 19:45, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:48, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]