User talk:Setm4edit

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

February 2021[edit]

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did at Matrimonial website, you may be blocked from editing. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. You have already been asked not to add spam links. (User talk:Anilchethackal#January 2021, User talk:Outlander07/Archives/2021/May#Sir Removed link). Do not add any other links to bismatrimony.com, as they will be removed. bonadea contributions talk 06:50, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet[edit]

Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Bismatrimony per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Bismatrimony. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Cabayi (talk) 11:38, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Remove block[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Setm4edit (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Dear Sir Kindly remove domain bismatrimony.com from blacklist . It was my mistake, i did not read the guidelines properly of wikipedia, hereafter I will not make the mistake again Setm4edit (talk) 11:45, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

Decline reason:

You currently have talk page access to request the unblocking of your user account, not to request whitelisting of your website. You need to request unblocking from your master account, Bismatrimony (talk · contribs). Cabayi (talk) 12:04, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Hi there, domains are generally not removed from the spam blacklist in response to the site owner's request. Since bismatrimony.com is a commercial website that does not appear to contain anything that would be considered a reliable source on Wikipedia, it will remain on the spam blacklist at this time.
If you would like to contribute to Wikipedia as an editor, and agree to refrain from promoting anything yourself or any businesses associated with you, you are welcome to submit a new unblock request from the Bismatrimony account at User talk:Bismatrimony. Since there is nothing that can be done from this account (Setm4edit), I will be disabling user talk page editing shortly. — Newslinger talk 12:13, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

February 2021[edit]

Stop hand
Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsabuse filter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

 — Newslinger talk 12:13, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]