User talk:Sehguraby

page recovered Sehguraby (talk) 21:59, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, Azeri republic[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Azeri republic. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Whole Azerbaijan. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Whole Azerbaijan – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Empire3131 (talk) 00:32, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Empire3131: ".. the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Whole Azerbaijan ..." whole azerbaijan iz lokated southern arax, it's a geographic region bvt azeries are livin' both coastal. jvst only one country, so thare'z no doubt 'bout yor mention

Sehguraby (talk) 01:01, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Sehguraby, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! VQuakr (talk) 09:08, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

February 2017[edit]

Please do not delete or edit legitimate talk page comments, as you did at Talk:Israel. Such edits are disruptive and appear to be vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. – 🐱? (talk) ^{(ping me!)} 22:54, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You did it again... Debresser (talk) 23:31, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from using talk pages such as Talk:Israel for general discussion of the topic or other unrelated topics. They are for discussion related to improving the article; not for use as a forum or chat room. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. See here for more information. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 00:01, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. I am glad to see that you are discussing a topic. However, as a general rule, talk pages such as Talk:Main Page are for discussion related to improving the article, not general discussion about the topic or unrelated topics. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. Thank you. 331dot (talk) 00:48, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quit it[edit]

If you can't stop the disruptive use of talk pages, including your deliberate misspellings, and other gibberish, you will be quickly blocked. --Jayron 32 01:53, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Materialscientist (talk) 02:08, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sehguraby (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

accept all and sorry, it was my first experience and now knew the rules Sehguraby (talk) 22:16, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I'm sorry, but there's simply no way you could have been unaware that your previous behaviour was unacceptable. Yamla (talk) 23:49, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Sehguraby (talk) 21:53, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sehguraby (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I'm deeply sorry. that all was my fault, I ask to forgive, I'm so depressed, because I love wikipedia, I learned many things from it, my disk is filled with tons of photos, maps and printed articles, but when I think about this, it makes me feel so disappointed. a very bad feeling Sehguraby (talk) 02:33, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yunshui ^雲 _水 09:08, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Block evasion[edit]

This user has engaged in block evasion using Quotientgabriel (talk · contribs) to get around their block. --Yamla (talk) 11:40, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sehguraby (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

1. I understand what I have been blocked for, *#will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and *#will make useful contributions instead. Sehguraby (talk) 22:19, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

By using a sock for block evasion you have substantially damaged your chances of an unblock. However, after 6 months the Standard Offer is possible. The way forward is to stay away from Wikipedia until at least 3 September 2017 and you will then need to put in a convincing appeal. Just Chilling (talk) 23:32, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.