User talk:Sauvahge

This is Sauvahge's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (February 27)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jovanmilic97 was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Art Nouveau instead.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Sauvahge/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Sauvahge/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Jovanmilic97 (talk) 16:04, 27 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Sauvahge! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Jovanmilic97 (talk) 16:04, 27 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

That is only brief overveiw, you will see that majority regional variants have their own main articles in adition to being covered on general article of Art Nouveau. See Vienna Secession, Stile Liberty, Jugendstil etc. Sauvahge (talk) 16:10, 27 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (February 27)[edit]

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Sulfurboy was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: This is basically a duplicate of the information already provided on the Art Nouveau page. This page is simply not needed as its already well covered on mainspace

Sulfurboy (talk) 16:28, 27 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It is not a duplicate, it goes more in depth, has more pictures which is essential for something visual like art and can be greatly expanded by other editors that participate in this topic. Basically all other regional styles have dedicated pages. Sauvahge (talk) 16:35, 27 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring[edit]

Your recent editing history at Art Deco shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially, as the page in question is currently under restrictions from the Arbitration Committee, if you violate the one-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than one revert on a single page with active Arbitration Committee restrictions within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the one-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the one-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Coldcreation (talk) 13:36, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

My sandbox[edit]

Bbb23 I request courtesy deletion of my entire sandbox, I wrote it and do not want to see it misused. Sauvahge (talk) 15:58, 14 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted per G5.--Bbb23 (talk) 16:01, 14 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]