User talk:Satellite779

Welcome!

Hello, Satellite779, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, like Moby Dick (band), may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! WuhWuz Dat 08:52, 8 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Moby Dick (band)[edit]

A tag has been placed on Moby Dick (band) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. WuhWuz Dat 08:52, 8 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Moby Dick (band)[edit]

I have nominated Moby Dick (band), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Moby Dick (band). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. WuhWuz Dat 16:03, 8 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Moby Dick[edit]

Hi Satellite779. Thanks for correcting and expanding my additions in Moby Dick (Serbian band). As it is misleading that at least two articles which links to Moby Dick (band) means the Hungarian metal band, I moved Moby Dick (band) to Moby Dick (Serbian band) and changed Moby Dick (band) to a disambiguation page. --Ilion2 (talk) 14:45, 9 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Swimming at the 2009 World Aquatics Championships – Women's 200m breaststroke[edit]

Hello! Your submission of Swimming at the 2009 World Aquatics Championships – Women's 200m breaststroke at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! \ Backslash Forwardslash / {talk} 13:44, 5 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nicolas Hülkenberg[edit]

Ah, no problem. The GP2 site always used to get it wrong, but here we're just perfectionists. ;) Erm...feel free to leave it. It's just that from the recent articles that have been created for GP2-level drivers, we just leave it as a generic racing driver in the lede, before mentioning their career. It's just personal preference I guess! Cs-wolves (talk) 12:55, 24 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ferrari F60[edit]

The major reason is that without the {{-}} operator you still get a large split in the article, but in this case it occurs in the middle of a section, not between sections, as the results table is forced to the bottom of the article while its title and key information moves up. The infobox continues down the page, drawing the readers' eyes with it, and the Contents box clearly lists other sections beyond those shown up the page, so there is little reason to think that people won't scroll down. Basically, if there has to be a page split it is better to do it between sections not in the middle of one. Pyrop e 15:57, 26 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Air India Express Flight 812[edit]

Hello Satellite779,
Regarding your "If pilot had dual citizenship why list only UK one?" edit summary, please see discussion here; Talk:Air India Express Flight 812#British.2FSerbian
And these edits:

Revision as of 19:44, 24 May 2010 [1]
Revision as of 11:41, 25 May 2010 [2]
the very next edit, [3]
then 8 edits later, [4]
then 7 edits later. [5]
12 edits later I re-add note about dual nationality.[6]
17 edits later you re-add Serbia flag [7]
1 edit later my note removed [8]

Basically it has been added, altered, removed and re-added over and over!
--220.101.28.25 (talk) 05:01, 29 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:05, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:09, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]