User talk:Sanjoydey33
Welcome![edit]
|
November 2011[edit]
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Tansen. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Joyson Noel Holla at me! 14:13, 18 November 2011 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for December 19[edit]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- Frithjof Schuon
- added a link pointing to Orientalist
- Hinduism in Australia
- added a link pointing to Hare Krishna
- List of converts to Hinduism
- added a link pointing to Traditionalist
- Vima Kadphises
- added a link pointing to Trishul
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:40, 19 December 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for December 30[edit]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Religion in India, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Alahabad. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:56, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 28[edit]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- Deva (Buddhism)
- added a link pointing to Devas
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:20, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:04, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:11, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
March 2016[edit]
Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Bihar, but we cannot accept original research. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 00:09, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 21[edit]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Murshidabad district, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ashura. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:23, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
November 2016[edit]
Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.
When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:
Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)
I noticed your recent edit to Historical Vedic religion does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.
Edit summary content is visible in:
Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → 
Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary.
Please note also that reliable sources for history can't be news media. Kautilya3 (talk) 22:08, 2 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]
Hello, Sanjoydey33. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Replaceable fair use File:Swaminarayan Temple Auckland dec 1 2016.jpg[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:Swaminarayan Temple Auckland dec 1 2016.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:
- Go to the file description page and add the text
{{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}}below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing<your reason>with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable. - On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.
Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 18:05, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
Warning concerning your edits on India[edit]
Twice now you've removed material regarding the development of social stratification without explanation (and I don't think there can be any). Two different editors have reverted you. If you think that there is justification for the removal please use the talk page now. Also, you changed BCE to BC making the article inconsistent and a violation of WP:ERA. Doug Weller talk 12:04, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
Your good-faith edit on India, May 2017[edit]
Hi,
Thanks formyour goodfaith edits on India. But as they were incorrect, I had to undo them. India is a formerly featured article. If you want to make any changes, kindly discuss it first on the talkpage of article. Thanks. —usernamekiran(talk) 14:51, 3 May 2017 (UTC)
July 2017[edit]
Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Chanakya, but we cannot accept original research. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Kautilya3 (talk) 19:17, 27 July 2017 (UTC)
December 2017[edit]
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Sarasvati River, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 07:13, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]
Hello, Sanjoydey33. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for January 20[edit]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Swahili language, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Indian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:35, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
[edit]
Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.
You can find more information about this survey on the project page and see how your feedback helps the Wikimedia Foundation support editors like you. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement (in English). Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through the EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys to remove you from the list.
Thank you!
[edit]
Every response for this survey can help the Wikimedia Foundation improve your experience on the Wikimedia projects. So far, we have heard from just 29% of Wikimedia contributors. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes to be completed. Take the survey now.
If you have already taken the survey, we are sorry you've received this reminder. We have design the survey to make it impossible to identify which users have taken the survey, so we have to send reminders to everyone. If you wish to opt-out of the next reminder or any other survey, send an email through EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys. You can also send any questions you have to this user email. Learn more about this survey on the project page. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this Wikimedia Foundation privacy statement. Thanks!
Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey[edit]
Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 23 April, 2018 (07:00 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.
If you already took the survey - thank you! We will not bother you again. We have designed the survey to make it impossible to identify which users have taken the survey, so we have to send reminders to everyone. To opt-out of future surveys, send an email through EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys. You can also send any questions you have to this user email. Learn more about this survey on the project page. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this Wikimedia Foundation privacy statement.
Indo-Aryan migrations[edit]
Talk:Indigenous Aryans/Archive 3#RfC: the "Indigenous Aryans" theory is fringe-theory. Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 05:50, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
DS-alert[edit]
Please carefully read this information:
The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.June 2018[edit]
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Suraxanı raion, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not invent facts. Wikipedia is not a place to publish your own ideas. — kashmīrī TALK 22:34, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Ateshgah of Baku. Please do not add your own speculations. No single reliable source names Ateshgah as a Hindu temple or mentions "invasions" you described. — kashmīrī TALK 18:20, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
Edit-warring at Siddha Yoga[edit]
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 03:28, 3 June 2018 (UTC)
June 2018[edit]
Please stop attacking other editors, as you did on Yoga. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Mind your words when accusing someone of vandalism without substance. This is a blockable offence on Wikipedia. — kashmīrī TALK 11:18, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
- This is by no standard a Wikipedia:No personal attacks. I never said anything about your personal race, sex, sexual orientation, age, religion or political belief, which is the defined terms for Wikipedia:No personal attacks. You removed many already established pages and links related to Yoga and related articles without proper source or discussion, thats why I put a warning of Wikipedia:Vandalism. Sanjoydey33 (talk) 11:32, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
- It's not vandalism if someone has only removed some part of content. Yes it a personal attack to call any reasonable edit a vandalism. Capitals00 (talk) 12:30, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
- I did not know that accusing someone for vandalism means a personal attack. Sorry for that. By no mean, I ever attacked somebody in person in wiki in last 8 years. But, for future references, could you point me to any Wiki policy which defines accusing someone of vandalism as a personal attack? Sanjoydey33 (talk) 13:05, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
- It's not vandalism if someone has only removed some part of content. Yes it a personal attack to call any reasonable edit a vandalism. Capitals00 (talk) 12:30, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits, such as your recent edits to List of largest peaceful gatherings, as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 11:35, 30 June 2018 (UTC)
- Thanks for correcting me. Now, reverted the page without mentioning it "minor". Sanjoydey33 (talk) 20:37, 5 July 2018 (UTC)
July 2018[edit]
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Hindu. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.
If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing Wikipedia. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. Kautilya3 (talk) 18:35, 8 July 2018 (UTC)
- This is completely unfair Kautilya3 that you are warning me for "edit warring". I was participating on the talk page as a part of getting consensus simultaneously. Many other users such as Abecedare and Ms Sarah Welch simultaneously editing the Hindu page and the talk page. But, you seem like did not complain about them, then why me alone? Sanjoydey33 (talk) 18:21, 9 July 2018 (UTC)
- No, I don't think so. I reverted your edit asking you to obtain WP:CONSENSUS. You made your edit without obtaining it. That is edit warring. None of the other editors repeated their edit. So bringing them up is a red herring. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 18:27, 9 July 2018 (UTC)
- If you want to avoid this kind of trouble in future, please follow WP:BRD. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 18:29, 9 July 2018 (UTC)
- I did not do that either. I did not repeat my edits, rather removed some of the parts of the original quote after suggestions from others, which was different from the previous edit. Sanjoydey33 (talk) 18:39, 9 July 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]
Hello, Sanjoydey33. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Mr.Dey Tai-Ahom is not a page for Hinduism , In the religion section there were the explanations of the religions ethnically and historically followed. Ahom religion and Ahom Buddhism are two different parts of Tai folk religion and Buddhism but there is no part of Hinduism known as Ahom Hinduism , So it will better not to spread your Movement on Tai-Ahom. --Namdang123 (talk) 04:23, 9 March 2019 (UTC)
- Namdang123: Two points I want to mention. First, I totally understand that this page is not about Hinduism, rather it is for Ahom people. But, at the same time, you should also understand that Tai-Ahom people and their religion are two different topics. I just only added one paragraph on the current Hindu culture followed by the majority of Tai-Ahom people, but I did not edit anything on Ahom religion, although such religion is not lost. I do not deny their native Ahom religion or previously followed some Buddhist culture, but at the same time you should also accept that there is not enough description of Hindu religion that Tai-Ahom kings adopted in the medieval period. Current Ahom culture is a mix of both Ahom religion and Hinduism. Second, please do not accuse people personally saying I am spreading a movement or so. Please talk only about the content of the article rather than personal accusations stop attacking. Rather you reverted the references to the existing Nasadiya Sukta in the page, which shows the commonality between ethnic Tai-Ahom and Hinduism. Current Ahom people believe in teachings of both cultures, so please do not create division among Tai-Ahom based on such cultural drift, rather mutual respect among the local traditions should be propagated as medieval Ahom kings did.
- As per your suggestion, I removed the tile Ahom Hinduism now, since it is a misnomer, which I think also applicable for Ahom Buddhism. So, I just modified the title as only Hinduism. Please do not reverting or undoing other editors' contributions without discussing with them, which will obstruct the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page. Sanjoydey33 (talk) 07:58, 9 March 2019 (UTC)
- 2SanjoyYou are welcome to edit about Hinduism followed by Ahom people but my argue was because you added the section as Ahom Hinduism which is not correct.You removed the Portion AHOM CONSUME BEEF But if you do not know about stop removing. Also, your many sources are not cited kindly cite sources as- GAIT 1906 , BARUA2008,and many more, If you can't cite it will still remain unreliable . Namdang123 (talk) 10:34, 9 March 2019 (UTC)
April 2019[edit]
Your addition to Konark Sun Temple has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 13:29, 2 April 2019 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for July 5[edit]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Architecture of Kerala, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Agama (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:55, 5 July 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message[edit]
| Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
IMDB ratings[edit]
Please don't add references to IMDB film ratings in articles. They are user generated and have no encyclopediac value. See WP:CITEIMDB for further info. Ravensfire (talk) 18:50, 13 January 2020 (UTC)
- Removing well sourced information w/o any attempt at discussing the rationales will lead to a revocation of editing privileges. ∯WBGconverse 19:24, 13 January 2020 (UTC)
- Well, Arre is not a unbiased source of media by any standard. Its beyond the reliable source guideline of Wiki to quote any unreliable sources to blame a movie of Islamophobe. One one hand, your profile seems to be purely secular and born to criticize religion, then how come then you are justifying a historic movie with true events as 'Islamophobe'? That sounds like a true defender of Islam who considers even a slight criticism of a well known atrocities of Muslim ruler as a criticism of Islam. If you say the fanatic Aurongazev is true Muslim who killed his Sufi Muslim brother Dara, and criticizing Aurngazev's historical wrong become associated with islamophobe, then please don't pretend in your profile as a criticizer of religion, rather a defender of radicalism. Sanjoydey33 (talk) 19:41, 13 January 2020 (UTC)
- Arre's critic is approved by RT as well as Metacritic. That alludes to their reliability, but you can challenge it at WP:RSN. I don't see how the rest of your rant is any relevant; my personal beliefs don't (and ought not) affect my summarizing of reliable sources on a subject. ∯WBGconverse 19:53, 13 January 2020 (UTC)
- Any reference on Arre's approval from RT and Metacritic? Sanjoydey33 (talk) 19:58, 13 January 2020 (UTC)
- Arre's critic is approved by RT as well as Metacritic. That alludes to their reliability, but you can challenge it at WP:RSN. I don't see how the rest of your rant is any relevant; my personal beliefs don't (and ought not) affect my summarizing of reliable sources on a subject. ∯WBGconverse 19:53, 13 January 2020 (UTC)
- Also, I have little idea about what you were trying to do over here. I read our article about The Wire and it seems to be a news-portal of much repute. It may be prudent to note that we have got editors from USA who have thought NYT to be left-biased and Breitbart to be TrueNews (TM); they did not last long. ∯WBGconverse 20:15, 13 January 2020 (UTC)
- Well, since you are dragging the issue of political bias. Let me tell you something as a long-term follower of Western and Indian society and politics. Please do not judge Indian society or even the whole world from the lens of western value of left and right. It does not work, since every country, especially the countries which have a long history of continuous civilization like India and China have their own world-view and perspective. The political history of left and right wings were invented in the Western Europe in a particular context from the Christian world-view, where faith use to reign supreme and every other people who does not belong to that Abrahamic faith are bound to perish in hell. In contrast, in India, China and Southeast Asia, the society were much more liberal and open towards the question of beliefs. It was mostly philosophies not faith, so they did not have animosity towards others. Having said that, now when the western backed so-called media like Wire who thinks they are the true liberals need to educate India and China and tries to impose their own ideologies on an already liberal societies who had suffered a lot from the western colonization, people are bound to resist. That's what you saw in the links you sent and no doubt, eventually wire has found their support base from more left-leaning often writing articles formally by CPIM party of India. Please be less judgmental about the world and try to understand Asian societies without any colonial prejudiced mind. Sanjoydey33 (talk) 20:36, 13 January 2020 (UTC)
- Yes, when you don't have anything to justify the article of Arre calling the film 'Islamophobic', now you can only talk about ban and edit warning!!! So much tolerance you are showing to a simple edit which removes the propaganda to defame anything(especially a movie) that is patriotic, right? When movies like PK directly attacks Hinduism without any historical facts, the same goons argue its just movie, so take it easy. But when a movie describes a historical wrongdoings of a Muslim king that has nothing to relate with Islam, then it has become Islamophobic? Hypocrisy has a limit to call that article a reliable source. Anyway, I am not going to argue on wiki with you anymore, since I got so much scared about your threat of ban :-)
- Your original research is irrelevant; the critic is a RS (as held above) and her opinion needs to be mentioned irrespective of our personal feelings. Get your review (about why Tanhaji is not Islamophobic et al) published over a national media of repute or get yourself deemed as a RT/Metacritic-approved critic and I will insert your views about the movie, as well. Ta, ∯WBGconverse 12:49, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
3R rules[edit]
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
Disambiguation link notification for February 29[edit]
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Hindu calendar, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pongal (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 11:36, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for May 9[edit]
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Religion in Spain, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sindhi (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 11:26, 9 May 2020 (UTC)
July 2020[edit]
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. --Alivardi (talk) 18:25, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bishonen | tålk 19:20, 8 July 2020 (UTC)- @Bishonen: I was on my way to remove personal attacks as clearly seen in my last edit of the page,[1] but I got disconnected before I could remove further on that day. I agree that the personal attacks were totally unwarranted and I should have never made them in the first place. I have read WP:NPA and WP:FOC more thoroughly. Additionally I won't treat ancient texts as the "true history" since it contradicts WP:RNPOV, as such I will edit the articles per what reliable sources state. Sanjoydey33 (talk) 03:02, 10 July 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message[edit]
| Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Disambiguation link notification for January 15[edit]
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Vaishnavism, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Balaji.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:26, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
May 2021[edit]
Hello, I'm Anita5192. I noticed that you recently removed content from Pythagorean theorem without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. — Anita5192 (talk) 05:31, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
- Hi Anita5192, thanks for the message and I am sorry that I forgot to provide an edit summary. I simply edited the remark by Carl Boyer, which is an opinion to downplay the contribution of Sulva Sutra as having foreign influence without any verifiable proof. So, I think it's better not to mention it, since it is not a scholarly remark rather than a speculation without proof. So, I think its better not to mention this view, since the contribution of Sulva Sutra is well-recognized in history of Mathematics as a fundamental contribution to Mathematics. Sanjoydey33 (talk) 21:22, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for September 14[edit]
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Wari-Bateshwar ruins, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nandi.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
| This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in South Asian social groups. Due to past disruption in this topic area, the community has enacted a more stringent set of rules. Any administrator may impose sanctions—such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks—on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic. For additional information, please see the guidance on these sanctions. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor. |
Tayi Arajakate Talk 20:37, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message[edit]
| Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
October 2022[edit]
Hello there. I reverted your unconstructive edit at Buta_Kola. Even though there are references you are removed. Do you even know little bit about Buta Kola?? The infos you removed claiming as "unsourced or original research" were the proper info!! If you don't know anything related to an article why do you even edit that. Please don't remove informations blindly!! TuluveRai123 (talk) 18:42, 24 October 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:40, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
January 2023[edit]
You removed a subheading : "Muslims and Onam celebration" in the article Onam. Kindly allow me to add it or add it yourself. I humbly request you to respond to this request if you have any objection to it. Neutralhappy (talk) 21:55, 28 January 2023 (UTC)
- I restored consensus version because lots of disruption happened recently. I did not remove the contribution of Muslims, but it should not hamper to write that it is a Hindu festival in the lead. Just because some Muslim reformists participated in Onam, does not dilute the fact that it is rooted and originated in Hinduism. Similarly, many Hindus participating in Eid festivals should not deny Eid to be a Islamic festival. Sanjoydey33 (talk) 17:49, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:32, 28 November 2023 (UTC)