User talk:Sampath123456789

Sampath123456789, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Hi Sampath123456789! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like AmaryllisGardener (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

20:02, 26 July 2017 (UTC)

Who shit are you Man..? Why are editing Gadwal

Vickiee4990 (talk) 09:40, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

arey o faltu ga... Vickiee4990 (talk) 14:18, 14 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Sampath123456789, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Xx236 (talk) 09:30, 24 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Gorentla[edit]

Hi, I'm Boleyn. Sampath123456789, thanks for creating Gorentla!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. This is at risk of deletion if no further edits are made.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Boleyn (talk) 09:53, 24 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Laxma Puram[edit]

Hi, I'm Boleyn. Sampath123456789, thanks for creating Laxma Puram!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please don't create articles without sources; this is likely to be swiftly tagged for deletion; please add your source.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Boleyn (talk) 10:21, 24 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Laxma Puram[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Laxma Puram requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. 2602:306:3357:BA0:6CF6:7C63:5A5:55BB (talk) 18:28, 24 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Gorentla[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Gorentla requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. 2602:306:3357:BA0:6CF6:7C63:5A5:55BB (talk) 18:29, 24 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

About gadwal[edit]

Hey why did u kept lock for editing option for gadwal wikipedia page Vickiee4990 (talk) 09:42, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Gadwal[edit]

Hey why are you editing gadwal wiki page? Vickiee4990 (talk) 18:48, 26 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

May 2018[edit]

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Yeh Rishta Kya Kehlata Hai, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Diff: [1] Cyphoidbomb (talk) 15:18, 14 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Gadwal. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.
You have made dozens of edits reverting Vickiee4990, yet there's no indication that you eve opened a discussion to seek consensus for the information you are trying to secure at Gadwal. Wikipedia is a community project, and that means you have to talk to other members of the community. Don't make any more changes like this until consensus has been achieved. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 15:29, 14 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Sampath123456789. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Arbitrary reordering[edit]

Hi there, re: this edit, please don't arbitrarily reorder things like this. While it was probably not your intention this sort of trivial change tends to look like you are reorganising the list based on some preference for ethnicity, rather than in an intuitive way. That tends to look like ethnic-warring, which is a problem we have at some Indian articles. Thank you. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:50, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

August 2019[edit]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to List of cities in Telangana by population, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. — MarkH21 (talk) 09:24, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Furthermore, your reordering of Nagarjuna Sagar Dam is arbitrary and deleted a necessary space, whereas the previous order was alphabetical. Your edit has been reverted. — MarkH21 (talk) 09:27, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Nagarjuna Sagar Dam. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. — MarkH21 (talk) 16:21, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion[edit]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Sampath123456789 reported by User:MarkH21 (Result: ). Thank you. — MarkH21 (talk) 19:57, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring at Nagarjuna Sagar Dam[edit]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

The full report is at the edit warring noticeboard. If your edits are reverted by others, it is normal to have a discussion to figure out what to do. Continuing to revert is against our policy. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 03:55, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sampath123456789 is clearly WP:NOTHERE. Immediately returned to continue edit warring by re-reverting and changing the location of Nagarjuna Sagar Dam and refusing to communicate. — MarkH21 (talk) 04:44, 25 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@EdJohnston: - I failed at pinging just two seconds ago — MarkH21 (talk) 04:47, 25 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sampath123456789 (talk · contribs) is now indefinitely blocked for continuing the war. Any admin may lift this block if they become convinced that Sampath will follow Wikipedia policy in the future. The block appeal options are given at WP:GAB. EdJohnston (talk) 13:15, 25 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]