User talk:Saman Kelegama

Saman Kelegama

I've had a stab at standardising the formatting of the Saman Kelegama article, but it still needs some work, I suggest you take a look at Help:Wiki markup. Also, since Saman Kelegama is the head of the IPS, material referenced to the IPS is not independent; other references need to be found for this information. Stuartyeates (talk) 10:37, 2 May 2013 (UTC)

Saman Kelegama

I notice that with this edit you removed the {{autobiography}} and {{cleanup}} tags without a justifying edit summary. Are you disputing that you are the subject of the article and that those cleanups are needed? Stuartyeates (talk) 05:30, 27 May 2013 (UTC)

June 2013

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Saman Kelegama, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Stuartyeates (talk) 22:58, 25 June 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Saman Kelegama concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Saman Kelegama, a page you created has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13. Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:53, 6 August 2013 (UTC)

Your article submission Saman Kelegama

Hello Saman Kelegama. It has been over six months since you last edited your article submission, entitled Saman Kelegama.

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note, however, that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Saman Kelegama}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 20:02, 5 September 2013 (UTC)

April 2014

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from Saman Kelegama. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Stuartyeates (talk) 07:15, 8 April 2014 (UTC)

Hello, Saman Kelegama. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Saman Kelegama, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:

• Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
• Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
• Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
• Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. ukexpat (talk) 13:53, 8 April 2014 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to Wikipedia. However, please remember that editors do not own articles and should respect the work of their fellow contributors on Saman Kelegama. If you create or edit an article, remember that others are free to change its content. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. The subject of an article does not get to dictate the content and style of the article. Stuartyeates (talk) 05:40, 9 April 2014 (UTC)

This is the only warning you will receive about ownership of articles, which you showed at Saman Kelegama. The next time you continue to disruptively edit Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. ukexpat (talk) 03:21, 11 April 2014 (UTC)