User talk:Saadus

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Saadus, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Osiris (talk) 15:26, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of My Lady Love, My Dove[edit]

A tag has been placed on My Lady Love, My Dove requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Osiris (talk) 15:26, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Joseph palaguachi[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Joseph palaguachi requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Spitfire^Tally-ho! 15:51, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

December 2012[edit]

Hello, I'm Favonian. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to 1997 because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Favonian (talk) 17:03, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at 1997 with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Wikipelli ^Talk 17:08, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at 1997, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Favonian (talk) 19:03, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Emily saadi[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Emily saadi, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Wikipelli ^Talk 20:14, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. - Favonian (talk) 20:16, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Saadus (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your reason here: I have been framed. I have never used wiki in a long time. Somebody hacked my account. Please unblock me and I will make sure my account is safe

Decline reason:

If your account has been used by someone else then it is a compromised account, and can not be unblocked under any circumstances. --Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 14:56, 5 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Saadus (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your reason here = Then can you delete this account and allow me to create a new account with the same IP address?

Decline reason:

No. The only way you may be allowed to return to editing is to persuade an administrator that you are going to edit constructively, so that you can be unblocked. JamesBWatson (talk) 15:12, 5 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Saadus (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your reason here= I am very sorry about this situation. I really want to be unblocked in order to help edit constructively. I request my unblocking. This is the first time for me using Wiki and I am not used to to what is constructive and not helpful. I promise that I will never do any more unconstructive editing.

Decline reason:

Per below. Kinu ^t/_c 17:26, 5 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Could you explain then what was wrong with your previous edits and what you're going to do if unblocked? Max Semenik (talk) 15:55, 5 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

For convenience, here [[1]] is the post you left here earlier today.--Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 16:07, 5 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

To clarify, is this account compromised as you claim above? --Kinu ^t/_c 16:28, 5 December 2012 (UTC) Yes this is the account that is compromised. Please HELP ME![reply]

As already indicated, compromised accounts cannot be unblocked. --Kinu ^t/_c 17:26, 5 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

So what can I DO?

Am I allowed to make a new account?