User talk:SPF-4505

Welcome[edit]

Hello, SPF-4505, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! KylieTastic (talk) 13:30, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Introduction Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia
Finding your way around
Table of contents Directories and indexes Department directory
Editing articles
How to develop an article Simplified Manual of Style

Getting help
Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Our help forum for new editors, the Teahouse The Help Desk, for more advanced questions Help pages Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
How you can help
Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

This is SPF-4505's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Shane Blades (September 4)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Shane Blades and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Shane Blades, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 13:30, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, SPF-4505! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 13:30, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Yvette Gonzalez-Nacer for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Yvette Gonzalez-Nacer is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yvette Gonzalez-Nacer until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 02:48, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Shane Blades[edit]

Hello, SPF-4505. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Shane Blades, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:32, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Shane Blades[edit]

Hello, SPF-4505. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Shane Blades".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:01, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

March 2022[edit]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 03:28, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

SPF-4505 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Fryboy Editor created his account on the 24th of July, 2021 and I created my account on September 4th, 2020‎. Just because I edit Infoboxes of fast food chains SHOULD NOT lead to me being unfairly blocked because unlike Fryboy Editor, I actually SOURCE my edits and give thorough resonings for my edits. I have also given edits to films 1, film companies 2, and even TV shows 3. And last but not least, After I made the edit to Upgrade, I took a long near 2-year hiatus from editing anything because a lot of things started happening in my personal life; I got a job, I moved to a new house, and I became more focused on those things rather than use wikipedia because even when I was on my laptop, it was always work-related.

Decline reason:

Funny how you're on the same IP range, though. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 05:04, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

SPF-4505 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

My conduct is not connected in any way with the block, that's an entirely separate situation and I am blocked because I just so happen to be in the same IP range.

Decline reason:

You are not blocked because you just so happen to be in the same IP range and you know it. That is one contributing factor. Yamla (talk) 21:01, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

SPF-4505 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This is not an unblock request. It could be if you take your time and read this message. I was too angry and ticked off to reply to you NinjaRobotPirate because I feel like you just enjoy trying to block users in this IP Address. I had to edit with an IP Address which got blocked 2 weeks ago. Now i'm just so angry at the wikepedia team because you took away one of my all time favorite pastimes and you don't seem to care. Your snarky "Funny how you're on the same IP range, though. " also gave me the truth, you enjoy blocking user's. Also you taking away my editing privileges made my anxiety worsen. I said on my talk page about how I wasn't on wikapedia for over a year but did you listen? Of course not, you just ASSUMED that I was a sockpuppet of Fryboy Editor just because I was interested in fast food pages> I know that your not going to take this seriously because its been 141 days (5 Months) since I made a request to be unblocked. Your just going to make another snarky reply like "It's not my problem" or "I don't care". Good day

Decline reason:

You're right that this is not an unblock request, so if it isn't I can't and won't accept it. But ... neither is this the forum to go on rants against the blocking admin. If that is what you will be using this page for from now on, don't expect to be able to use this page to request unblock. — Daniel Case (talk) 06:30, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.