User talk:SHJX

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome![edit]

Hello, SHJX!

Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Getting Started

Tutorial
Learn everything you need to know to get started.


The Teahouse
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.


The Task Center
Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help.

Tips
  • Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
  • It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
  • If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue at the article's talk page. Be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is consensus.
  • Always use edit summaries to explain your changes.
  • When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
  • If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
  • Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.

Happy editing! Cheers, Hajoon0102 💬 00:04, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Don't revert so hastily - journalists reported "GB200" as the name of a die based on slide 26 of this document, but they were wrong. The GB200 product is a "Grace" CPU and two Blackwell B200 GPUs on one circuit board - from March 18, 2024:

https://nvidianews.nvidia.com/news/nvidia-blackwell-platform-arrives-to-power-a-new-era-of-computing

NVIDIA Blackwell Platform Arrives to Power a New Era of Computing

A Massive Superchip

The NVIDIA GB200 Grace Blackwell Superchip connects two NVIDIA B200 Tensor Core GPUs to the NVIDIA Grace CPU over a 900GB/s ultra-low-power NVLink chip-to-chip interconnect.

See also the naming convention of the GH200 "superchip", one Grace CPU and one Hopper GPU - https://www.nvidia.com/en-us/data-center/grace-hopper-superchip/ one🍪cookie 18:55, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wake Up Dead Man[edit]

Please note that there is currently a draft being worked on at Draft:Wake Up Dead Man, and per Draft talk:Wake Up Dead Man, once filming begins, the article will be published at "Wake Up Dead Man", without the subtitle as it is an unnecessary disambiguation per WP:CONCISE. We do not need to use the full official title, Wake Up Dead Man: A Knives Out Mystery, which should NOT be created as an article separate from this draft, and should remain a redirect. Trailblazer101 (talk) 22:51, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wake Up Dead Man: A Knives Out Mystery is the full official title of the film, not the shorthand Wake up Dead Man which it may be casually referred to as. The article should follow the film's official title. This was already agreed by the talk page for Glass Onion where the articles title should be Glass Onion: A Knives Out Mystery as that is what the film is actually called and not some casual nickname. The article being titled Wake Up Dead Man: A Knives Out Mystery would simply be in keeping with how the Glass Onion article was titled. The Empire Strikes Back is referred to sometimes by the shorthand Empire but that doesn't mean that its article should be titled "Empire (1980 film)". WP:TITLE states that proper article titles " unambiguously identifies the article's subject and distinguishes it from other subjects". In the case of Wake Up Dead Man, it needs to be clearly distinguished from the U2 song of the same name by instead using the film's full title. This was the case with Glass Onion too where the film had to be distinguihshed from the 1968 song by The Beatles. Pretending that peple can clearly ideentify a subject by shorthand nicknames is WP:RECENTISM.
Secondly, WP:TITLE states that article titles "should be consistent with the pattern of similar articles' titles", meaning that Wake Up Dead Man: A Knives Out Mystery should be consistent with its predecessor Glass Onion: A Knives Out Mystery. SHJX (talk) 20:12, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]