User talk:SDLexington
YES[edit]
thank all who would support me I have been found not guilty like michael SDLexington (talk) 11:45, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
Good, please continue to contribute constructively to wikipedia. Yours, have a good day. Realist2 ('Come Speak To Me') 13:30, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
- I am glad to hear it. Now please stop using caps. I am going to archive your talk page by the way. Rgoodermote 20:53, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
Keep up the good work. Realist2 ('Come Speak To Me') 15:30, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
First Archive[edit]
I have taken the liberty to create your archive for you. Most people do this every month or so or when it gets out of hand. There is a cool thing about this site. If you do not like what I did you can revert back my work. Rgoodermote 20:57, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
- I am only helping you because you are a new editor. I am sorry but I will not support any views. As that is against WP:NPOV. Rgoodermote 17:16, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
May 2008[edit]
This is not a warning no worries but it is a suggestion. Most people like me ignore trolls like that. So do not take anything personal. I myself get stalked pretty much annually by an anon user and I just do what I always do. Revert, Warn and Ignore and repeat until the user has received the proper set of warnings then I warn. So please just ignore people like that. Their goal is just to annoy and bug a person and to get a reaction out of them. Like what you did. Also please read WP:BEANS. No offense to you. I am just trying to keep you out of trouble. The edit in question can be found here. O and suggestion. Try making a userpage so that we can know more about you. Do not go overboard though. We have rules to follow. So nothing POV. Follow WP:USERPAGE and you should be fine. Rgoodermote 22:25, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
Reply Changes[edit]
No. Violation of WP:NPOV sorry. Rgoodermote 17:23, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
You must not add a statement of your opinion to articles. It is forbidden in this official policy: WP:NPOV. Please do not add statements of your opinion to articles again. Thanks. ➨ REDVEЯS looks at danger and laughs his head off 10:33, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
- Furthermore, if you were to believe that certain additions aren't POV, then discussing their addition shoudl always be done on that article's talk page, not on any noticeboard. That discussion is likely to be closed shortly, bring any more discussion regarding the MJ article to that talk page. Let me know if you have any further questions. Gwynand | Talk•Contribs 13:34, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
wrong noticeboard[edit]
does this mean that it was the wrong noticeboard??
and I should be on talk michael jackson because i have been told of for being on there before SDLexington (talk) 14:31, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
- There is no "noticeboard" for discussing adding content to an article, just that article's talk age. Some other user's might be somewhat
admonishedbothered by your type style, it might do you good to "preview" your posts, and then fix grammar, spelling, punctuation, before submitting. Remember, Wikipedia is not the same as an instant messenger or texting. Gwynand | Talk•Contribs 14:34, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
Your recent edits[edit]
Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button 
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 15:03, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
I have closed the deletion debate on this article as Speedy Keep. As I note there, the fact that you disagree with or dislike the content of an article doesn't in itself represent a reason to delete that article. That said, if the article is found to fail any of our policies, then a re-nomination may be in order. However, given your comments at the Administrators Noticeboard, here, at the AfD, and elsewhere, I would strongly recommend that you not attempt to delete this article again, as consensus seems to indicate that you are not unbiased in so far as Mr. Jackson is concerned. Please stop; continued agitation for non-neutral edits to this and other articles could be viewed as disruptive, and disruptive editing may result in your being blocked from editing. Best to you, UltraExactZZ Claims ~ Evidence 15:30, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
- Not a problem. I understand that you feel strongly about this issue, and there are issues that I too feel strongly about. The issue was that your feelings appeared to interfere with the edits you made or requested, which is problematic. Everything has to be sourced, so - if you have a reliable source that says something, you can include it in an article. If not, unfortunately, we cannot accept it. So long as you keep that in mind and discuss problems on the talk pages, I don't think you'll have any further problems. Just remember that we're all on the same team, we're all trying to build a better encyclopedia. There are other sites for other things, including praise of Michael, but this site is for neutral facts. Best, UltraExactZZ Claims ~ Evidence 12:12, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions, including your edits to Jordie chandler. However, please be aware of Wikipedia's policy that biographical information about living persons must not be libelous. Any controversial statements about a living person added to an article, or any other Wikipedia page, must include proper sources. Thank you. --Allen3 talk 12:07, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
Adoption offer[edit]
Hi SDLexington. Saw that you were looking for an adopter and just wanted to let you know that I'd be willing to "take you under my wing" until you reach Apprentive editor status. If you'd rather someone else or are no longer interested, no sweat...just let me know :) --Eustress (talk) 17:02, 25 May 2008 (UTC)