User talk:Ryan Postlethwaite/archive3

Wild Beasts

Hi Ryan! To be honest I'm now quite satisfied with the Wild Beasts article. I've never even heard of the band before, but the combination of citations seems to be good for a few months at least - by which time the Domino Recods website may well have been updated to include them. I'll keep an eye on the article and try to find some further sources as time allows. Thanks for your interest. QuagmireDog 17:02, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

Well, I just thought it was best to give you the option of Afd, in my opinion the band meet WP:MUSIC how the article is a present, but thanks alot for the help with the article RyanPostlethwaite^{See the mess I've created or let's have banter} 17:44, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

Edit conflict

Heh, yeah, thanks for keeping an eye on that one. Do you use ARV or another tool like it? I love it, I'd try it out if you don't. See you around vandal hunting no doubt. Peace, delldot | talk 23:49, 27 January 2007 (UTC)

I use Lupins tool and popups but caught this one in my watchlist. WIll have a look at ARV now you mention it, good work again! RyanPostlethwaite^{See the mess I've created or let's have banter} 23:52, 27 January 2007 (UTC)

My RfA

Thank you for your support in my recent RfA. I think valid criticisms were raised in areas that I need to work on, so I've withdrawn my name. I intend to work on addressing the concerns that were raised, and think I need to work contributing without allowing myself to become as stressed as I have been at times, which did result in some inappropriate behavior. Perhaps I may re-explore adminship at some point in the future, but it's a little early to consider that. Again, thank you. Fan-1967 21:41, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

Well I think you'd have done a great admin job, Definately reapply in a few months time RyanPostlethwaite^{See the mess I've created or let's have banter} 21:42, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

I'll definitely give it some thought. I need to figure out how to deal with the tasks at hand without letting it cause me to get too stressed and start snapping. A cool head is needed, even when dealing with the vandals and children. Fan-1967 21:47, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

I'm considering going for adminship in a few months time (when I say a few, I mean about 6!) and the issues brought up in your Rfa were something I'm going to have to consider myself. Civility is an important issue on wikipedia, but it is often very hard when talking to blatant vandals or people posting nonsense or peronal attack pages and often these cannot be distinguished from new users not understanding wikipedia. Maybe the most important lesson for everyone to take out of your Rfa is to assume good faith with all editors RyanPostlethwaite^{See the mess I've created or let's have banter} 21:55, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

Some of the new users can be hard. Maybe they're just putting their User page in the wrong place, maybe they really can't accept that this is not myspace. Sometimes they'll get all huffy and insist that everyone is notable and deserves a page. Sometimes they're really just deliberately trolling, but you can't be sure. I guess the proper response is stick to cool civility at all times, and pretend to AGF even when it's totally implausible. Fan-1967 21:59, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for reverting the vandalism on my userpage! You're hard work is greatly appreciated. --TeaDrinker 22:45, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

Not a problem, glad I could be of service! RyanPostlethwaite^{See the mess I've created or let's have banter} 22:47, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

How Rude!

Reverting the edits without explanation! (Club Buggery) A poor newbie attempts to fix a glaring omission, only to see his work disappear in a puff of nothing. Not so much as a 'by your leave'. His work may have lacked quality, but surely deserves a word of explanation. Or preferably an edit, rather than deletion. If that is too much work for you, then let it stand.220.233.109.170 09:52, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

I left a message on your talk page explaining exactly why I reverted you RyanPostlethwaite^{See the mess I've created or let's have banter} 11:00, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

You explained nothing. A condescending form letter with no reference to the article content. There's something un-Australian about that. Is this because I didn't log in? 220.233.109.170 14:15, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

Sorry, it was not meant to be condescending in anyway. I'll try and explain now - Basically the line you added was not relevant in the article, and it was more of a point of view than a fact and these aren't allowed on wikipedia. Its nothing to do with you not logging in, the context of your entry was just not required RyanPostlethwaite^{See the mess I've created or let's have banter} 14:23, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

Thankyou for that. I disagree on relevancy in this particular context, however the facts may be wrong, or not as public as i believed. My bad.220.233.109.170 02:04, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

Ubaidullah Sindhi‎

You have reverted my edits without historic fact checking. Mirza Ghulam Ahmed Qadiani was a self-proclaimed prophet touted as a British agent by Indians fighting against British Rule. A praise from a die-hard anti-British like Mr. Sindhi for Mirza Ghulam is like Bin Laden reported as praising George Bush or Ben Goriyan praising Adolf Hitler. This very claim is idiotic. Please do some historic research. I am not a fan of Mr. Sindhi who was an anti-Sufi Wahhabi but I want to keep wikipedia clean from nonsense Hassanfarooqi 17:35, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

I have never editted this page, could you please elaborate on your comment before throwing accusation at me, the history is available for the article here. RyanPostlethwaite^{See the mess I've created or let's have banter} 17:37, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

You know very well what you did. Yes the history somehow does not show you reverted and re-reverted the changes of the main article but it does show you reverted the discussion and then re-reverted. Here is the link. [1]

Well tell me its the discussion next time instead of just letting me assume, that was down to rolling back another edit, which I much have pressed rollback for your edit by accident, which I have now sorted. I think next time you confront a user about something you should consider toning down the way you speak to people and assume good faith RyanPostlethwaite^{See the mess I've created or let's have banter} 17:58, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

I apologize if I sounded confronting in my first post, it was supposed to be pure technical. Maybe you should have assumed good faith before retaliating ;) No hard feelings from my side, so let us get over it :) Hassanfarooqi 18:42, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

Yeah no problem, guess we both must have been in a bad mood! Sorry for my original mistake RyanPostlethwaite^{See the mess I've created or let's have banter} 18:44, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for January 29th, 2007.

The Wikipedia Signpost Weekly Delivery

Volume 3, Issue 5	29 January 2007	About the Signpost

Foundation names advisory board, new hires	Court decisions citing Wikipedia proliferate
Microsoft approach to improving articles opens can of worms	WikiWorld comic: "Hyperthymesia"
News and notes: Investigation board deprecated, milestones	Features and admins
Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News	The Report on Lengthy Litigation

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 18:38, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

Advice to User:Jaakobou

Hello Ryanpostlethwaite, I see that you recently advised User:Jaakobou about how to warn me about vandalism [2]. As you have seen fit to intervene in this editors dispute with me, could you please be so kind as to explain to me which of my edits to my own user page constitute vandalism? Thanks Abu ali 19:16, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

Hi Abu, I simply moved the warnings from your user page to your talk page as I simply thought you would not want them there. With regards to advising User:Jaakobou on his talk page about giving final warnings, this was because he posted a comment on WP:AIV asking for help regarding your edits. The reason why I advised him was because 1)AIV should only be used to report users not get advice regarding them and 2)users should only be reported once they have been given a final warning. I wasn't in anyway implying that I thought your edits were vandalism, I was simply advising on the appropriate course of action to take with regards to reporting users. Regards RyanPostlethwaite^{See the mess I've created or let's have banter} 19:24, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for moving the warnings from my user page. I do definately prefer them on my talk page. But if you advise editors about leaving warnings in future, I would remind them to only use vandalism warnings when vandalism actually has taken place. In the case of User:Jaakobou, I personally would have advised him to calm down a bit. Regards Abu ali 21:22, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

Thank you!

For the revert on User:Ali-oops/Images - appreciate it! :) - Alison^✍ 23:12, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

No problem, glad I could be of service! RyanPostlethwaite^{See the mess I've created or let's have banter} 23:14, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

And thank you yet again! Twice! Will it ever stop! :) - Alison^✍ 11:32, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

not spam

please, dude, im not spaming my school page. this is all information relevent to the atmosphere of my school. i would appriciate it if you would stop removing it. thank you.

-Paulthegreat103

Seriously, this is not needed on wikipedia! Please view the guidline WP:NOT, and if you want to add anything further to the page, please read the guidlins for reliable sources which must be added to back up your claims RyanPostlethwaite^{See the mess I've created or let's have banter} 23:26, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

Wikipedia is retarded ####### site. It's so ###### pointless and it's pages constantly change. A free-content encyclopedia has got to be the dumbest idea ever mostly because people in general are dumb and will do what I did to pages. And just for being a bitch about it, heres a gold BITCH STAR.

just for being a bitch about it, heres a gold BITCH STAR Mnemoniclist 23:42, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

Mnemoniclist 23:42, 30 January 2007 (UTC)Me

oh man, you've never even been to my school. i have permission FROM THE PRINCIPAL to post this about the school. And what about you? you got nothing better to do all day than go through the thousands of wiki articles and complain about them? how pathetic. you need to get laid. BIG TIME.

-paulthegreat103

you suck

oh man, you've never even been to my school. i have permission FROM THE PRINCIPAL to post this about the school. And what about you? you got nothing better to do all day than go through the thousands of wiki articles and complain about them? how pathetic. you need to get laid. BIG TIME. -paulthegreat103

• This is hilarious! Paul, wouldn't you be better off doing constructive edits instead of constantly reverting to your POV version? - Alison^✍ 00:14, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
  • wouldn't YOU be better off with plastic surgery? I've seen your picture, and I think you would. ;) —Preceding unsigned comment added by paulthegreat103 (talk • contribs)
    • Already have, dude. Should I look for my money back? BTW - where's my bitch star? - Alison^✍ 00:33, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
    • I'm quite honoured to receive it! I've added it to my awards on my userpage! RyanPostlethwaite^{See the mess I've created or let's have banter} 00:16, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
      • ps, congradulations on recieving the bitch star, you definatly deserve it ryan.—Preceding unsigned comment added by paulthegreat103 (talk • contribs)

Thanks :) RyanPostlethwaite^{See the mess I've created or let's have banter} 00:27, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

AIV

Ha ha, I think you just got me back for beating you to AIV that time, I think you just beat me to reporting that IP that was stalking you. BTW, the above conversation is hilarious. Why don't I get a bitch star??? delldot | talk 01:45, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

Yes! Got you back! A bitch star is coming your way! RyanPostlethwaite^{See the mess I've created or let's have banter} 01:46, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

actually, I got in before you. Do I get a special prize? :-) Still think you deserve a bitch star, though :-D - Alison^✍ 01:49, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

Gutting! Just wait till next time delldot!! RyanPostlethwaite^{See the mess I've created or let's have banter} 01:51, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

Sweet! Ha ha, my very own bitch star! I will treasure it always. delldot | talk 01:53, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

WHo gave him the right to blank my userpage? How did I personally attack him? Embargo 10:39, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

Please let us avoid double-standards. Others are allowed to curse Hezbollah, some curse Muslims in general, some curse Arabs. How is my userbox provocative? Is it because it points out to Israeli hostilities? I barely contribute to Wikipedia because I have see what they do to pro-Arabs. Wikipedia is largely subjective. It seems this person wants to provoke me, because I have been inactive for some time. Tell him to leave me alone if you will, and I hope you would do the same. Embargo 10:51, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

Greetings. Ryan, let us avoid double-standards, again. There are userboxes with "I support the State of Israel". Its opposite would be "I support (Hezbollah)", isn't it? I also indicated that I support armed resistance in case there were Israeli hostilities. I think the last part is what disturbs you most, the fact that I point out to Israeli hostilities. Something the whole world has witnessed this summer. Until every userbox that shows support to any party is removed, I will remove mine. Just to be fair, and logical. Also, please notify me before deleting my userpage. I do not think it is allowed. Embargo 15:28, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

NeSSI trademark issue...and thanks

Ryan, thanks for your comments. They are the first that actually describe what is objectionable and/or offer constructive advice about how to improve our submission. Without going into the long explanation you thought was coming....The University of Washington did indeed trademark (not copyright) register the NeSSI name, mainly to keep it open and avoid it being hijacked by some commercial interest for their product. However, trademarks and copyrights are quite different beasts -- although I now completely understand why you initially flagged it as an advert (does kinda look that way to an outsider). I will try to edit the page to disclose more fully the nature of NeSSI and its relationship to the University, companies involved in commercialization, end-users, and the public. I will also see what I can do to incorporate your other comments and make it more generally accessible to those not involved in the technology. I am at a conference this week but will do the edits early next. Thanks again for your comments. Veltkamp 18:05, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

• Since we passed the delete vote, I made my edits directly to the NeSSI page. Hopefully there is a better context for the page now. 2 questions: 1) is there a way to re-link a photo that was deleted due to not having a use or copyright tag? The original was subbitted by a collaborator and he is unavailable for a few days...if I could add the "use" info, I wouldn't need to re-upload the photo I don't have right now (although I do have the ok to post the photo). 2) can I remove the line(s) below -- they don't pertain to this subject? This is mostly a "point-of-policy" question, as I'm fairly new and unclear about editing someone elses text. A more relevent question might be "can I delete other's (or my own) posts on the NeSSI.talk page that are no longer relevent?"
  Thanks,Veltkamp 19:38, 6 February 2007 (UTC)

I will remove the "Israeli atrocities" because I really don't have the time or the patience to argue. Why is my userpage protected? Looks like you guys really do want to provoke me. Ask them to unprotect, if you will. Embargo 23:11, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

Your message

That's OK, no problem (I couldn't work out why you'd done it, though I knew that it wasn't WP:POINT because you'd voted against the other proposal). --Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 00:02, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for reverting vandal

Hi Ryanpostlethwaite, thanks for reverting vandalism from my user page. Regards, Shyam ^(T/C) 19:40, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

NP :) RyanPostlethwaite^{See the mess I've created or let's have banter} 20:58, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for reverting vandalism from my talk page. Keep up the great work! xCentaur |  talk  20:53, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

Glad I could help, just reported him to AIV for post test 4 vandalism RyanPostlethwaite^{See the mess I've created or let's have banter} 20:58, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Lakeland.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:Lakeland.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 10:54, 3 February 2007 (UTC)

Have you heard of a newspaper called the Western Mail?

Thanks

Thanks for the revert to my user page! delldot | talk 00:24, 4 February 2007 (UTC)

No problem :) Thanks for the ladybird - I'll add it to my bitch star! RyanPostlethwaite^{See the mess I've created or let's have banter} 00:30, 4 February 2007 (UTC)

What?

Don't call me a vandal, i was just cleaning up what you did.F=IV3 00:36, 4 February 2007 (UTC)

This is a message to Ryan. You either have comitted vandalism, and you reverted it, or you didn't. It seems that you are not a trustworthy source either, seeing that many people made strange remarks about you and gave you a very appropriate star. Anyway, if there is a problem, contact me, but if you really did not vandalize or anything, accept my apologies. --This was posted at the place you reported me. Read it carefully, don't skim, and play attention to the last sentence.

Well, as i was using Lupin's filter, it caught you for some reason. What editing have you done to cause this? Ill check your contributions now.

Ok

Well then, accept my apologies. I'll look into that. Isn't that what Christian brothers and sisters are supposed to do? p.s. please stop adding a ToC.. sheesh -.-

Thanks Ryan! Ill do that, but for now, ill do hwk xD.

Hey, i was just wondering on how to use subst.. i've read the guides.. but they aren't really illuminating.. thanks. Lemme try something. {{subst:|article}} i dont get it lol..

He said himself to feel free.

Yeah constusctive edits not vandalism RyanPostlethwaite^{See the mess I've created or let's have banter} 23:05, 4 February 2007 (UTC)

He said to PLEASE edit the page.

It's not vandalizim, it's making is page b cool with humour. If you noticed, thath's the only thing I edited.

subst

I sort of get it.. SO you are replacing with special characters. Do you mind if i do something? I am going to try something. Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to the shark page. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. .. meh, im such a slow learner xD (P.s. ryan, ignore what it says, i was merely testing :))

<nowikie>WoW! it worked! Thanks Ryan. Ill incorporate it into my regular warnings. Once again thankS!</nowikie>

bea bea

LOSER GET A LIFE ONLY NERDS SIT HERE ON WIKIPEDIA AND FIX EDITING MAYBE U SHOULD TRY TO GET A GIRL OR SOMETHING —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Rustysrfbrds99 (talk • contribs) 23:10, 4 February 2007 (UTC).

wait a sec.. i dont get what nowiki does.. im sorry that im such a slow learner F=IV3 [[soul-mine]] 23:16, 4 February 2007 (UTC) p.s. how do you make a link to your user site in the signature section? F=IV3 [[soul-mine]] 23:18, 4 February 2007 (UTC) <---- i only get this hmm.. let me try..<nowikie> </nowikie> wait a sec.. is wiki spelled like "wiki" or "wikie?" F=IV3 [[user:soul-mine]] 23:24, 4 February 2007 (UTC)

Hey ryan, this is what i get : F=IV3 Soul-mine^{Talk to me} 23:33, 4 February 2007 (UTC) Thanks for helping me out! Did i do something wrong?

Thanks so much for all you have done for me, ryan. Its all good now. This will be my permanent sig: Soul-mine^{Talk to me} 23:40, 4 February 2007 (UTC) Adios!

Eh.. Sorry to disturb you again, but i cannot use the "nonadmin rollback." Do you know why? If so, can you step me through it? Thanks.Soul-mine^{Talk to me} 23:50, 4 February 2007 (UTC)

Linking

Hello, i cannot link a site, and properly rename it. Could you help? :: [Vandalism Unit] It never comes out right =C Its supposed to say counter vandalism when it says vandalism.. Soul-mine^{Talk to me} 23:57, 4 February 2007 (UTC)

WP:RFCN

Hey! I wasent trying to be offesnive or what not. Trust me, your work is much aprpeciated! There are many nam,es that you catch that are blatant and just need to be blocked on site. For those, I would like to thank you with the barnstar below! For the other, i am just concered about new editrs (but I think you get my concern)! Thanks again for the hard work. -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 18:14, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

		The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar
		I, Chrislk02, award you this defender of the wiki barnstar for your great work against vandalism and improper usernames! Keep up the great work. -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 18:14, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

You handle difficult situations well. There are many wikipedians who could learn from you. I would also give you a resilient barnstar for that but I already gave you a barnstar. Perhaps another day! Keep up the more than excellent work. -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 18:20, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

Cheers chris, your a good bloke, you've made me feel good again when I was feeling down RyanPostlethwaite^{See the mess I've created or let's have banter} 18:21, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

No problem! I think many of us have been there. I was not trying to sound like an ass complaning! Hope it did not come across as that. If you would ever like a quick second opinion regarding a username, or anything for that matter, please feel free to let me know on my talk page! Thanks. -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 18:24, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

My RfA

Hey Ryanpostlethwaite,

I just would like to thank you for your support in my recent request for adminship, which passed with a final tally of 54/13/11. I appreciate the trust expressed by members of the community, and will do my best to uphold it.

Naturally, I am still becoming accustomed to using the new tools, so if you have suggestions or feedback, or need anything please let me know. - Gilliam 20:59, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

Rollback

Yeah... its about Lupin's filter... Do you know how to revert it? I know where the button is, and if i press it, nothing happens. Nothing, zilch nada. Soul-mine^{Talk to me} 01:10, 6 February 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for February 5th, 2007.

The Wikipedia Signpost Weekly Delivery

Volume 3, Issue 6	5 February 2007	About the Signpost

Foundation organizational changes enacted	Group of arbitrators makes public statement about IRC
AstroTurf PR firm discovered astroturfing	WikiWorld comic: "Clabbers"
News and notes: More legal citations, milestones	Wikipedia in the News
Features and admins	Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Report on Lengthy Litigation

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:26, 6 February 2007 (UTC)

Vandalism

Thanks for watching my back and reverting! It's much appreciated. Philippe Beaudette 20:08, 6 February 2007 (UTC)

No problem, the guys block indef now anway - he vandalised my userpage straight after I'd given hom a warning for vandalising yours! RyanPostlethwaite^{See the mess I've created or let's have banter} 20:10, 6 February 2007 (UTC)

Well, that doesn't say a great deal for him now, does it?  :-) Philippe Beaudette 20:14, 6 February 2007 (UTC)

Re: Cotton

You are welcome, and thanks for understanding why I didn't protect it. It seemed that the most recent vandals repeated their efforts a couple times, which was why I mentioned it. Keep up your good work reverting the vandalism; if things get significantly worse, definitly re-report it. -- Natalya 16:50, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

Interest in adminship

Since you are in the AMA, I assume you are interested in becoming an admin, and I've posted your name on Wikipedia:List of non-admins with high edit counts accordingly. You can remove it if you want, or simply strike it off if you actually aren't considering adminship. − Twas Now ( talk • contribs • e-mail ) 19:27, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

Music notability

I was just working on User talk:Ryanpostlethwaite/WP:MUSIC (album) when I got your message. If you agree with my criteria (on the talk page), then move it up to the main subpage. I'm going to let WikiProject Music know about this. − Twas Now ( talk • contribs • e-mail ) 22:16, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

I just cross-posted this request to WikiProject Albums and WikiProject Songs. − Twas Now ( talk • contribs • e-mail ) 22:27, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

Yeah just saw, good work!! We'll just have to seewhat response we get................ RyanPostlethwaite^{See the mess I've created or let's have banter} 22:28, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

Your note

Aw, shucks! Thanks! delldot | talk 01:14, 11 February 2007 (UTC)

I hope that wan't an insult! [3] :-p RyanPostlethwaite^{See the mess I've created or let's have banter} 01:21, 11 February 2007 (UTC)

Heh, just being unbearably Southern. Thanks for the congrats and the support! I was always so scared to put in an RfA, but it wasn't as horrible as I feared :) Let me know if you need anything or have any input about my use of the tools. And feel free to drop me a note if you notice AIV get full or anything. ('Course, I'm still waiting around right now, I guess the 'crats are busy after that downtime). See you around! Peace, delldot | talk 00:55, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

And what about my request for deletion of the main page!? RyanPostlethwaite^{See the mess I've created or let's have banter} 00:57, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

No worries about the Chacor thing, no harm done anyway. Thanks for sticking up for me though! I'm glad to have you as my wikifriend! :) delldot | talk 02:06, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

David Joyce

Hello David,

The entry for David Joyce has been amended to deal with your issues connected with the page.MikeJKearney 00:50, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

I've taken this to Afd RyanPostlethwaite^{See the mess I've created or let's have banter} 01:12, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

EVP

Thanks for your message and offer of help on the EVP page deletion. I put that edit in when there was an edit conflict. I think I'll see if the unsupported skeptical -or pro- claims and weasel words can be taken out before I propose deletion. I just don't think that this can be treated fairly. I don't have any reason to believe in EVP, but it seems skeptics can't be prevented from putting in supposed, scientists say, self-proclaimed, etc. etc., and making one scientist into many (seem my most recent edits). I really think that Wikipedia may not be equipped to deal fairly with such a controversial subject.

BTW, I could hardly load your talk page on my slow connection. Martin^phi _{(Talk Ψ Contribs)} 01:01, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

Sounds like I need to archive my page! I will do it tomorrow! I've replied to the rest on your talk page RyanPostlethwaite^{See the mess I've created or let's have banter} 01:13, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

vandal

Yea, they already struck out by vandalising your talk page. -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 18:58, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

Another one bites the dust then I guess! Thanks again RyanPostlethwaite^{See the mess I've created or let's have banter} 19:00, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for February 12th, 2007.

The Wikipedia Signpost Weekly Delivery

Volume 3, Issue 7	12 February 2007	About the Signpost

US government agencies discovered editing	Comment prompts discussion of Wikimedia's financial situation
Board recapitulates licensing policy principles	WikiWorld comic: "Extreme ironing"
News and notes: Picture of the Year, milestones	Features and admins
Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News	The Report on Lengthy Litigation

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:32, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

Roger Royle

Many thanks for your compliments about my tweaks to the Roger Royle page. Sadly I can't claim any in-depth knowledge about the Rev Royle; I just happened to find a biog link at icWales.co.uk —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Wheresmike (talk • contribs) 16:44, 13 February 2007 (UTC).

Barnstar

Thank you for the barnstar. I am honored very much. -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 21:33, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

Not a problem, all the work you do (especially so recently after being given the mop) really does inspire me to want to become an admin in the future. You do great work Chris RyanPostlethwaite^{See the mess I've created or let's have banter} 21:38, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

Thank you. If you would like an informal editor review or a consult before you may be interested in an RFA, let me know and i would be glad to peruse your contribs and make a reccomendation, maybye even nominate you. -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 21:44, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

Cheers Chris, thinking in about 3-4 months, need to address a few issues first though (I've been trying to be more civil with vandals and sometimes I interpet policy in my way, not the wikipedia way), but an editor review would be much appreciated before I'm thinking of going for it, and trust me, I am making an active step to try and sort any issues out. Lets face it, it can't be nice to be laughed off an Rfa and only truly deserving editors should be given the mop RyanPostlethwaite^{See the mess I've created or let's have banter} 21:49, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

Er!?

Have you seen this edit summary! Tyrenius 23:09, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

You might also be interested to look at Special:Contributions/Ryanpostlethwaite, after you notified me it seams all my popup edit summaries have been like that! Guess it might be a good idea to look at my monobook but I haven't changed it! I'll try and stop using popups for the minute (although its by way of habbit now!). I'm really sorry if its caused any problems and thanks or letting me know RyanPostlethwaite^{See the mess I've created or let's have banter} 23:16, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

No problem. I found it quite amusing, not to mention succinct. Perhaps it should be universally adopted. But I thought I should tell you nevertheless. Tyrenius 23:20, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

Ah well, I guess theres no harm done then, we should probably see if Lupin could adapt it in!!! Cheers again RyanPostlethwaite^{See the mess I've created or let's have banter} 23:22, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

Embargo's vandalism of my page

Hi, may you explain me which part of WP:USER the userbox

This user supports free and independent state of Israel.

is violating? I do aks you for quotation of the section, because I can't find there any prohibition of expreessing support to same state or political belief. Thanks --ja_62 18:25, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

The part of WP:USER that the userbox violates is this section;

• Polemical statements:

“ libelling people on userpages is a bad idea, and in fact, using userpages to attack people or campaign for or against anything or anyone is a bad idea ”

- Jimbo Wales

Particularly Jimbo's statement, which states that campaigning for anything is a bad idea. Please note however, that this is just my opinion that the userbox fails this. Embargo's editing of your userpage was not vandalism as he was acting in good faith, thats why I commented on his talkpage RyanPostlethwaite^{See the mess I've created or let's have banter} 18:35, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

-Well, reading what you wrote me, I must assume, that I understand english better than you - I don't campaign for someone or against something, and my support for 'free and democratic' Israel does not attack any one or anything - in my userbox I just express my support for the state of Israel - it's just like to have tag {I like Spinach} - and been vandalised by devoted Carnivore - and t if Embargo was AGF, why he did not write me anything on my talk page? He just had vandalised my page. --ja_62 18:49, 15 February 2007 (UTC) BTW - What you see polemical on fact that I support Israel?

Re: Pet sitting

I did some minor modifications. The article looks nice, but with a section about insurance, it will surely attract spammers and advertisements, so watch out. -- ReyBrujo 16:36, 16 February 2007 (UTC)

I agree, I'll keep my eye out, cheers for the reply RyanPostlethwaite^{See the mess I've created or let's have banter} 16:41, 16 February 2007 (UTC)

Link.

Would you mind coming to my talk page? There's something there I would like you to see. I think I have joined the club you are in. Acalamari 20:30, 16 February 2007 (UTC)

I'll see you there!!! RyanPostlethwaite^{See the mess I've created or let's have banter} 22:32, 16 February 2007 (UTC)

No worries

Nah, nah, nah, don't worry about it. Honestly, I find the whole thing kind of amusing ;) Anyway, like I said before, no harm done, right? I could tell you were joking around on WP:BN, but I figured you might feel bad about it, which is why I left you that earlier note. Anyway, it's over now, hopefully! See you around. Peace, delldot | talk 02:19, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

I really hope so, good look in your Rfa (I'm beig cautious now), again, I'm really sorry RyanPostlethwaite^{See the mess I've created or let's have banter} 02:21, 18 February 2007 (UTC)