User talk:Rovalle234

This user is a student editor in Rice_University/Poverty,_Justice,_and_Human_Capabilities_(Spring_2023) .

This user is a student editor in Rice_University/Poverty,_Justice,_and_Human_Capabilities,_Section_1_(Fall_2022) .

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Rovalle234, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Ian and I work with Wiki Education; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.

I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing.

Handouts
Editing Wikipedia, a guide for student editors Choosing an article to edit Add images to articles Citing sources on Wikipedia
Additional Resources
You can find answers to many student questions in our FAQ.

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) 17:46, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Roselyn! I am Catherine, a fellow student in your Poverty, Justice, and Human Capabilities class. I am looking forward to working with you this semester and reading your contributions to the Wikipedia community. CatherineGCC (talk) 02:08, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi![edit]

Hi Roselyn! My name is Ekene. I am one of your classmates in PJHC 371. I am excited to go on this Wikipedia learning journey with you and our other classmates this semester! EEmenike (talk) 22:56, 1 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Violence Against Women in Mexico Peer Review: Moran[edit]

The article does well to provide a variety of differing sources in a well synthesized/summarized manner, without “favoring” any one portion or section. The copyediting was also well done, and while there is still some room for improvement here, it really made the article much better than the original. The tone of the writing was also a very positive aspect, as it sounded professional and stylistically very much like wikipedia.

The only real changes I would make would be to move the activism section to the end, remove or expand the cultural references section, and improve the copyediting. I might also add some of the sources into the actual paragraphs as that is helpful to readers and the credibility of the sentence as well. I would also consider adding a picture or two.

The most important thing that you could do is probably fix some of the punctuation errors, as they sometimes interrupt the flow of the article and detract from the substance a little. Other than that and what is said above, I think the article is a great example of a well-done edit to an existing page. Jackspm10 (talk) 02:44, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Peer Review: Gao[edit]

Wonderful job on this article! You did a great job organizing the article (e.g. pre/post colonial lenses on violence) and improving the grammar/writing mechanics such that the language is more accurate. Your more substantial additions, such as the “Invisibility, Normalization and Impunity” section add important insights on how this issue is perpetuated and draws from a variety of sources—statistics, legal systems, and cultural context. In terms of improvements, I would suggest to continue to add in more modern themes/lenses such as social media and the internet. Jag223 (talk) 03:58, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]