User talk:Roseleigh

Welcome![edit]

Welcome...

Hello, Roseleigh, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like this place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! ♥Nici♥Vampire♥Heart♥ 15:46, 13 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

August 2009[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Shane Horgan. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. ♥Nici♥Vampire♥Heart♥ 15:46, 13 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

September 2009[edit]

Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Shane_Horgan, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. ConcernedVancouverite (talk) 18:19, 18 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Addiction Worldwide[edit]

I have nominated Addiction Worldwide, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Addiction Worldwide. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. ConcernedVancouverite (talk) 18:24, 18 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Simple answer[edit]

We are trying to publish a wiki page for our company but seem to be struggling with getting it accepted, we are very new to Wikipedia! Are you able to offer some suggestions as to what we are doing wrong? Roseleigh (talk · contribs) [via e-mail]

Yes, it is very simple: you are trying to publish a wiki page for your company. That is what is wrong. Please read {{uw-coi}}. Just wait. When your company becomes notable, you may be sure that someone with no COI will write about it here. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 03:47, 11 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I do work for Addiction Worldwide and I am trying to create a page that meets the Wikipedia requirements. I have followed the advice you directed me to on the uw-coi pages and I hope that this will help. Thanks again for the advice. -- — Preceding unsigned comment added by Roseleigh (talk • contribs)

I have looked at other London ad agencies such as BBH and 23rd. Were both of these created by people not in the agency? -- Roseleigh (talk · contribs) [via e-mail]

Is it too difficult for you too provide the proper titles for the two articles you reference? Writing by someone with a COI is "strongly discouraged". But in the case of your company, the AfD discussion concluded that the company is not notable. That means that nobody, with or without COI, should be writing about it. If you wish to persist, follow this advice and find someone to sponsor the article through deletion review. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 11:17, 28 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]