User talk:Rose1909

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Rose1909, you are invited to the Teahouse[edit]

Teahouse logo

Hi Rose1909! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Ryan Vesey (I'm a Teahouse host)

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 01:15, 4 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Santa Diabla revisions of English grammar[edit]

To begin, (Milan carries no accent). Stop to revert vandalism edits, no cross on the characters is added. The literal translation of the novel (Holy Devil), ok?. If you want to correct the translation but do-it is not necessary to add information or things that go against manual wikipedia style.--GeorgeMilan (Talk) 23:17, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

To begin, I did not change ANY accents. If there is or is not an accent on Milan is something someone else did or changed. In the novela many times Santa says she's not a "santa" and that refers to "saint" or "saintly", the correct translation for Santa (not holy). If you insist on "Holy" keep it. Just know it's not a correct translation as it's used in the novela. I did not make any changes "that go against manual wikipedia style". Please do not revert to the incorrect translation/grammar of the remainder of the article.Rose1909 (talk) 04:21, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
From what I've seen fascinates you generate edit wars, regardless of the content you added they think is best, I hope not to have to repeat the same with you again as I have said no crosses are added to characters, and Milan not an accent, I've seen that you engage in reverse.--GeorgeMilan (Talk) 04:41, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I don't know where the crosses came from. I did not add them, and I don't believe in crosses on characters anyway because I think it tells too much about the plot. I'm still tracing the history to determine when the crosses were added. I also did not add an accent to Milan. I'll research that too. You ask people not to attack you on your translations, but then you seem to attack with words like fascinates you to generate edit wars. When you don't agree with an edit, why not ask about it before reverting to your original? Editors want the best possible article. Why not work together with other editors?Rose1909 (talk) 04:53, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
When I was working on the grammar, an anonymous user added the crosses. See the Cast edit done at 12:01, 22 February 2014, by 87.219.130.234. I did not do it. Thank you for taking them off.Rose1909 (talk) 05:02, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
If you look at the edit of 02:19, 21 February 2014 by LauraLN5, it seems that Milan might have been edited by that person. Again, it was NOT me.Rose1909 (talk) 05:11, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Okay, that was what I was trying to remove and you seemed to understand, but anyway you just apologize. Greetings.--GeorgeMilan (Talk) 05:19, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Mi Corazón Es Tuyo[edit]

Hello, I've seen you're good arranging translations, well I hope you understand me, I wonder if you could edit the article: Mi Corazón Es Tuyo.--Damián80 (talk) 01:48, 3 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I just saw your message. Yes, I am happy to help with Mi Corazón. Rose1909 (talk) 18:12, 26 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:01, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]