User talk:Rjwilmsi/Archive Sep 2007

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Regarding your last edit to The Pearl-Qatar: are you sure this was supposed to be "district", and not "distinct"? The latter makes more sense to me; I'm not sure what a "district precinct" would be. —RuakhTALK 20:05, 17 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Replied: yes, it should be distinct. Article fixed. Rjwilmsi 20:09, 17 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. :-)   —RuakhTALK 21:36, 17 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for correcting spellings on this article. Can I request that you allow me to continue to edit in content for now (I should be done by the end of the day) so we can take up spellings at that time. I just lost some of my edits in a edit conflict.thanks for your kind efforts.Dineshkannambadi 15:20, 25 August 2007 (UTC) [reply]

You're Invited![edit]

Hello! I thought you may be interested in joining WikiProject Dravidian civilizations. We work on creating, expanding and making general changes to Dravidian related articles. If you would be interested in joining feel free to visit the Participants Page! Thank You.

Just letting you know that your contribution to the Dravidian architecture page is appreciated. Regards. Wiki Raja 05:36, 27 August 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Typo fixing[edit]

Hello. Please be sure that you are cautious when doing typo fixing such as [1]. The edit caused no harm, but you should not generally fix typos within reference tags. --After Midnight 0001 23:29, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Replied: agree, but not worth reverting an edit for. Rjwilmsi 22:31, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The edit was not reverted. --After Midnight 0001 01:28, 6 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I meant 'not worth me reverting the edit for'. Rjwilmsi 07:03, 6 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

For that matter, this, which definitely did need to be reverted (the error you introduced persisted for a month and has only just been fixed) -- 86.139.86.174 11:16, 6 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Reliable[edit]

HOW RELIABLE IS THIS DICTIONARY? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Twiccletos (talkcontribs) 18:32, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What dictionary? -- 86.139.86.174 11:17, 6 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Typos in cite field[edit]

Please be careful when doing AWB edits to correct typos on citation tags - your change here [2] on Polikarpov R-5 (which only edited half the cites to the reference in question) broke the reference table. Nigel Ish 18:01, 6 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]