User talk:Riya Iyer S Menon

Riya Iyer S Menon, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Hi Riya Iyer S Menon! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like 78.26 (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 18 September 2020 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived[edit]

Hi Riya Iyer S Menon! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Cropping of image?, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.

The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 3[edit]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Namrata Shirodkar

added a link pointing to English

Sathish G.

added a link pointing to Tamil

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:58, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome![edit]

A cartoon centipede reads books and types on a laptop. — The Wikipede and the Picture Tutorial. *(image credit)*

Welcome!

Hello, Riya Iyer S Menon, and welcome to Wikipedia! I have noticed that you are fairly new! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. I also see that some of your recent edits show an interest in the use of images and/or photos on Wikipedia.

Did you know that ...

...Wikipedia has a very stringent image use policy?
...most images from Flickr, online news websites, and other web sources are copyrighted?
...Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously?
...freely-licensed images should be uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, a central location for images where they can be used on all Wikipedia projects?
...we recommend that new users use our "files for upload" process – at least until you get the hang of things?

If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{Help me}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Rickyurs (talk) 16:10, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Image[edit]

Hi! Can you upload the images of Vani Bhojan, if you have any images of Vani Bhojan kindly upload. She have 3 images but she has more Wikipedia's that's only. Can you see and move to main page Draft: Thazh Thiravaa, Draft:Aranthangi Nisha, Draft:Shivani Narayanan this is My humble request to you Eswnav (talk) 11:52, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kindly reply me Eswnav (talk) 11:57, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Reply me Eswnav (talk) 12:13, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 11[edit]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Bhagyalakshmi

added links pointing to Kanaka and Amala

Shane Nigam

added links pointing to Best and Pair

Leela Samson

added a link pointing to Tamil

Radha Mohan

added a link pointing to Mozhi

Sunaina

added a link pointing to Tamil

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:31, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I will correct it soon..thank you for the correction and support...Riya Iyer S Menon (talk) 03:39, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A belated welcome![edit]

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Riya Iyer S Menon! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

If you don't already know, you should sign your posts on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) to insert your username and the date.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! Chennai Passangai (talk) 07:29, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Riya Iyer S Menon (talk) 07:34, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

November 2020[edit]

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! Idell (talk) 13:34, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. Idell (talk) 13:35, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Retouch and re-edit[edit]

Can you please edit on my upload of shweta menon profile? Thanks. Stephenfryfan (talk) 18:59, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Done Riya Iyer S Menon14:36, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you this much. But, actually it is under the same file informations stated for the previous one while the present one is procured from her own website- https://www.shwetha-menon.com/model.php.

Could you please solve? Thanks again. Stephenfryfan (talk) 15:49, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

And... I wpuld definitely support if you even change it for a third profiling image due to the second one's poor visual resolution and the first one's procurement from a third party website and lack of vividness and charm quality. Stephenfryfan (talk) 15:56, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I think fb has some very qualified ones. Stephenfryfan (talk) 15:58, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding wiki[edit]

Hello riya wanted to spk with u regarding wikipedia creation of few artists Chiki170 (talk) 07:44, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, you can ask me, but if I am aware regarding that i can solve it, but if not, you can seek help to other admins.I am not having much experience here.Riya Iyer S Menon 08:19, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for ur response i am trying to create this article its getting rejected. once it had got approved again it got nominated to speedy delectation person is notable has many individual sources but i am getting error as person is not notable kindly look into the article & help me https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Anusha_(actress) — Preceding unsigned comment added by AjKa180 (talk • contribs) 04:24, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Vani Bhojan[edit]

Hi! You doing good but Vani Bhojan article please edit that shortly. Like in Vani Bhojan career I edit so long but you edit shortly. Please don't re edit of Vani Bhojan. Thanks Eswnav (talk) 08:21, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

In Career title is must. Eswnav (talk) 08:22, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Done Riya Iyer S Menon 08:30, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

In Vani Bhojan Filmography Film is different and web series is different. Thanks Eswnav (talk) 08:51, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sun kudumbam viruthugal See this link https://www.indiantvinfo.com/sun-kudumbam-awards-2018/?amp Latest winner is Nithya ram and Vani Bhojan Eswnav (talk) 08:54, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned any of this Name except award categoriesRiya Iyer S Menon 08:57, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 13[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sathya Enna Penkutty, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Serial.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:31, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Edit-warring at Vani Bhojan[edit]

If you keep edit-warring at Vani Bhojan, I'm going to prohibit you from editing that article any more. Discuss the issues you have topic-by-topic. You can't just delete large swaths of content and call it "unwanted", especially when someone else apparently wants it. TALK. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 03:21, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Twitter as a source[edit]

It is acceptable per WP:TWITTER. Also pinging Eswnav‎ to let him know. --Kailash29792 (talk) 04:06, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

But should be a verified account, lest we publish something that isn't actually coming from the primary source. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 04:11, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Stars[edit]

Re: this and your previous submissions of this, per Template:Infobox film instructions, we derive starring cast from the film poster's billing block. Based on this poster, I see two people, Vijay and Sethupathi credited in print. Your repeated removal of Sethupathi is unjustified. Unless you can demonstrate definitively that Sethupathi is not credited as a star of the film, there is no justification to remove this content. You need to start familiarising yourself with our community guidelines, including infobox rules.

Also, "stars" typically means the people in the lead roles. Saying "the film stars ... in the lead roles" is redundant and unnecessary.

Lastly, here's your final warning about this: When edits you make are reverted, you need to open a discussion and seek consensus for the changes you wish to make. If you don't have consensus, and you restore a disputed edit, it is considered edit-warring. You have been told this numerous times. If you do it again, your editing privileges will be pulled. This is a community project. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 21:47, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

November 2020[edit]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 17:28, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

In the section above, I told you three things that you should have paid attention to: 1) That you need to read the Template:Infobox film instructions. 2) that we typically derive a film's starring cast from the film poster's billing block, and 3) that a film's "stars" are typically its lead actors. In this edit, you apparently didn't read the Infobox instructions, you didn't base this addition on the film poster's billing block, and instead, you four more people to the |starring= parameter based on some personal preference known only to you.

It's no crime to not understand community guidelines when you start editing, but if people keep telling you what the guidelines are, or that you should read those guidelines, and instead you make random changes that don't align with community standards or preferences, that's a problem. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 17:34, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

List of Indian television actresses[edit]

Hello, I'm Adakiko. I noticed that you recently removed content from List of Indian television actresses without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Adakiko (talk) 09:34, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I removed content from List of Indian television actresses as I provided

, where it has similar names in that article too. Riya Iyer S Menon 09:42, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Discuss such a large change on the article's talk page first, get wp:concensus first, then remove the content. That is a huge change to be doing without other peoples' input. Adakiko (talk) 09:52, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Image size[edit]

Please see Help:Pictures#Thumbnail sizes In general, do not define the size of an image unless there is a good reason to do so Adakiko (talk) 09:52, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please use edit summaries?[edit]

If you have trouble remembering as I do, you can set it to remind you in your Preferences --> Editing --> "Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary (or the default undo summary)" Adakiko (talk) 10:42, 21 November 2020 (UTC) Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.[reply]

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! Adakiko (talk) 10:42, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I might be a bit confused here[edit]

On List of Indian television actresses, I read the top line This is the list of notable Indian television actresses appears in Indian Soap Operas. What is with the "appears in Indian Soap Operas"? Is this only about actresses who appear in soap operas? I suspect that line may not belong. What do you think? I appear to have erroneously assumed that you were conflating soap opera actresses with other TV actresses. Please reply here a ping me? Use {{ping|Adakiko}} (leave out the wp:NOWIKI stuff - it is for formatting). Cheers Adakiko (talk) 10:57, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'm signing off for the night! Cheers Adakiko (talk) 10:58, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Adakiko: :The List of actresses in the article List of Indian television actresses, clearly says that they appears in Indian Television Soap Operas.Soap operas are not only in Indian languages but in foriegn to other international wide too.So I specified as so.Riya Iyer S Menon 11:11, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nishant[edit]

Hi User:Riya Iyer S Menon please don’t change image in Nishant Singh Malkani as the one that was in before was much better and a recent picture so please don’t do it. And so in Sara Khan don’t change Hina Khan picture either as they are recent and better images. Last warning stop changing images in people’s articles. Recent images are better than old — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A01:4C8:A2:7E3B:8133:AE77:C6CD:9AB6 (talk) 11:46, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User:Riya Iyer S Menon Tell me why are you changing images in Sara Hina Nishant page the current images are much better as they are recent we don’t want to show old images of them. Please refrain from doing it please understand don’t do it again. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A01:4C8:A2:7E3B:6486:E374:D385:C12F (talk) 12:19, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The recent images as well as images from the start of the career of a Person are important(Like from birth to growth stages).I replaced more good picture which looks better and much preferable.Why you undid the recent edit other than those images i have provided there Riya Iyer S Menon 12:29, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I am very sorry for talking to you in that matter Riya I am very sorry please don’t report me. I was a bit fustrated please accept my apology and all I wanted to say is the recent ones are better than old. Riya Iyer S Menon please sorry

Riya Iyer S Menon Please reply I am really sorry I mean it I should of not talked to you in that way please delete that comment in the other user page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A01:4C8:A2:7E3B:89D4:87C:86EE:C7FA (talk) 13:21, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Riya Iyer S Menon Please reply please understand don’t change the images as the recent ones are better — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A01:4C8:A2:7E3B:89D4:87C:86EE:C7FA (talk) 13:27, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Rita[edit]

User:Riya Iyer S Menon Please reply I just want to say I am really sorry for talking to you in that way I have realised how upset you must be. It’s just I just wanted you to understand that the recent pictures were better than the old ones. Please understand this and don’t get upset. Please User:Riya Iyer S Menon — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A01:4C8:A2:7E3B:60B0:C7E2:AC69:8888 (talk) 13:35, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:58, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring at Vani Bhojan again[edit]

Your recent editing history at Vani Bhojan shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
Both you and Eswnav need to stop edit warring on this article and on other articles (such as Meeku Maathrame Cheptha). Use the article talk pages to discuss the content, and do not attack the other editor even if you think they are wrong. Assume that they are trying to improve the encyclopedia just as much as you are, and only comment on content, not on other editors. bonadea contributions talk 23:07, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Bonadea:; For me wikipedia is a platform for good edits.I am not in a war as I keep good edits,but branding someone ie, Vani Bhojan by User Esnaw is same as vandalism and disruptive.He always keep nurturing and highlighting her only and articles related to that article,even I mentioned him multiple times.Do you think it is good?Is there anything wrong done by me?

Why branding others in the article of Vani Bhojan? Eswnav always do unecessary and long wise content for providing a statement or an information. I corrected it in a good way but the great fan based infactuation of Esnaw made it irritated by my Good Edits and undoing the way i corrected the article. Still why eswnav is still unblocked???????He always after her,for even minute things.

lastly i edited once again in a good way .Please check that & protect that page from Esnaw & b;lock him from that page for further edits.

Riya Iyer S Menon (talk) 05:30, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Bonadea:;Please do make a check, and my Edits & Esnaw's fanboy Highlighting for Vani Bhojan in each articles related to her.Please Realize the Real thing behind this fan Edits by Esnaw.Riya Iyer S Menon (talk) 05:45, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 29[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ajmal Ameer, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Debut.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:12, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Don't delete things if you don't know what they're for.[edit]

Re: this, don't delete content or templates if you don't know what purpose they serve. These changes are indistinguishable from vandalism. If you want to know what at template does (templates are usually indicated by some content in double braces, like {{Commons category}}, then go to the search box and type "Template:Commons category" or "Template:Name of the template". But deleting things you don't understand is not helpful. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 14:23, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

WP:OVERLINK[edit]

Hi there, re: this, please see WP:OVERLINK. We don't need duplicate wikilinks once we have linked to something. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 13:52, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Starring = lead roles[edit]

As previously noted, re: this, "starring" typically means "in the lead roles". A film's stars are typically the highest-billed, most important actors, which generally means they have the lead roles. Saying "the film stars ... in lead roles" is needlessly repetitive, as is me having to tell you this twice. English may not be your strongest skill, so when people who are native English speakers offer you some advice, you might want to take it. If someone told me I was making grammar mistakes or repetitive language in Malayalam, I would imagine I'd listen to what they had to say. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 17:05, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please head this advice from @Cyphoidbomb:. You have made the same unnecessary, redundant wording here which I have reverted. BOVINEBOY2008 14:04, 28 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 7[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Priya Raman, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Debut.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:25, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits on Netrikann (2021 film)[edit]

Hello Riya Iyer S Menon, several of your edits on the page Netrikann (2021 film) have not been constructive. For example, most recently, you changed the edits I made, removing redlinks around Milind Rau for no apparent reason; changing the language of the text, rendering it grammatically incorrect; and removing an entire section for no apparent reason. I do not accuse of you of acting in bad faith, but your edits have not improved the article. Please refrain from undoing the edits I have made and focus on adding useful material to the text. If you dispute any material or edits currently on the page, please discuss this on the talk page, thank you. Revirvlkodlaku (talk) 16:00, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Riya Iyer S Menon you have ignored my message to you and continued to make unhelpful edits on the Netrikann (2021 film) page. Wikipedia is a collaborative effort and you are not living up to that standard. Please stop making disruptive edits. Revirvlkodlaku (talk) 15:13, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Revirvlkodlaku: :I removed the redlinks around Milind Rau as there is No page exist for that particular person.Removing redlinks around such persons or articles without an existing page is not wrong, but fine and applicable.I never continued to make unhelpful edits on the Netrikann (2021 film) page.You are misunderstanding over my edits.It is an upcoming movie.No much details are revealed about it with more reliable sources.So, I corrected some of them.That's it.Never make an issue over it.kindly keep doing good edits.Riya Iyer S Menon 13:32, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Riya Iyer S Menon thank you for your response. Redlinks in an article serve the purpose of inviting other editors to create a new article where one is warranted, and in this way they help the project grow, so removing them is not necessarily a good thing. Please be sure to make constructive edits and not to reassert grammar errors after they have been corrected. All the best. Revirvlkodlaku (talk) 14:57, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Riya Iyer S Menon, it appears clear to me that you are set on continuing to make disruptive edits on this page. Despite repeated attempts on my part to ask you in a civil manner that you desist from unconstructive editing, you persist in the same manner. I can see from other comments on your talk page that your editing privileges have been suspended in the past. This is your last warning from me. Stop making disruptive edits. Your editing privileges will be suspended if you continue. Revirvlkodlaku (talk) 16:59, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Don't remove templates if you don't know what they're for[edit]

Re: this, you inexplicably removed the {{hlist}} template, which was properly formatted, and replaced it with HTML line breaks, which is not the preferred way to format the content in this field. Don't make changes if you don't know what you are doing. And yet again, if you are editing infoboxes, you need to read the instructions. See Template:Infobox person, which clearly indicates that a flat list should be included in the |occupation= parameter. You did something similar in these edits, where you removed various maintenance templates from the top of the article, like {{short description}}, {{Use DMY dates}} and {{Use Indian English}}. And, there's no point in adding "model" to her occupation since the article says nothing about her being a model. The occupation parameter should summarise the occupations that make the subject notable. If you keep making ill-advised edits that bring the article out of alignment with community preferences, your editing privileges will be interrupted. Again. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 23:06, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Updated Photo of Priya Bhavani Shankar?[edit]

I guess the current picture depicting her is too old. Do you agree that there should be an updated picture here? My changes are getting reverted by the other person Eswnav, not sure, maybe he's got a negative attitude. Praveentech (talk) 11:01, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Praveentech: :Yes I do agree with you.Me too faces the same kind of problem from that user Eswnav.He keeps revert my good edits.He's a mad fan of Vani Bhojan...now he turned towards Priya Bhavani Shankar.He is always after Vani Bhojan.I replaced that image in Priya Bhavani Shankar page with the one you provided,which is more good than other.Riya Iyer S Menon 19:23, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

December 2020[edit]

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! Vikram Vincent 14:58, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Middle Class Abbayi[edit]

Re: these changes, you can't editorialise in articles by talking about "impressive comebacks". Wikipedia isn't a blog. If a specific source describe someone's comeback as impressive, then you would have to quote that or otherwise attribute it to a specific voice. The claim that the film received average reviews is not sourced either. You are not a critical response aggregator, so you don't get to decide what the overall response was. We need secondary sources to say that. You also claimed that it was the 8th highest-grossing Telugu film of 2017, but where's the source for that? Wikipedia? You can't use Wikipedia as a reference. That's a basic concept here. WP:UGC. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 00:20, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 28[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Hima Shankar, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Boeing Boeing.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:29, 28 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Improper tone, etc.[edit]

Re: this, you're copying too much from the Indian trade sites and entertainment blogs, etc. Actors don't get "roped in", they get "signed" or "brought in". Further, it seems you aren't even clear on what the sources said, because there's no indication that Shetty was signed or officially "roped in". Bollywood Hungama says "In her next film with Prabhas entitled Saaho, Anushka makes her full-fledged Hindi debut." Well, that clearly didn't happen, right? And your phrasing suggests that she signed a contract when we don't know that to be true. It might be fair to say that she was considered for the role or even that "Anushka Shetty was offered the role, but had to decline when Saaho's filming schedule conflicted with her work on ___". Do you see the difference?

Additionally, we don't use ampersands (these → &&&) in encyclopedic prose, we use the word "and". This is basic English. We communicate in words, not in symbols. Note also that Filmibeat is not a reliable source. How you've made it this far without knowing that, is a mystery to me. We don't care about blogs or content aggregators or other faceless websites, and we also don't care about gossip blogs like Filmibeat or Bollywoodlife, or any of the others. See WP:RS and see also WP:ICTFSOURCES so that maybe you can get a basic understanding of sources that are considered suitable.

Re: this, you miscapitalised "mother", which is not a proper noun, and you added a reference for something that isn't likely to be controversial. If the film was released, it likely has onscreen credits, right? And in those credits I'm sure Tamannaah is mentioned, no? If she is, then that's all we need. A primary source (the film itself) can be used as a reference for uncontroversial claims, like who was in the film.

I have faith in your ability to edit here constructively, but it's important that you expand your understanding of proper English, and unfortunately, Wikipedia is not a school. If you consistently demonstrate an inability to adhere to English norms and other editing norms, we are likely going to have a problem. So please, listen, try to understand, and grow. And please know that my admonishments are not personal. Thank you. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 02:00, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Cyphoidbomb:

Sorry if I have done anything wrong ...I will correct my mistakes...Thanks for your valuable notes and advices.. Riya Iyer S Menon 14:60, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Awards[edit]

Hi there, re: this, per WP:FILMCRITICLIST, we only care about notable awards, which typically means awards that have Wikipedia articles, where notability has been properly established.

Additionally, you seem to be confusing a non-notable award mill, the Dadasaheb Phalke Awards South, with the Dadasaheb Phalke Award, an award issued by the Indian government. In the latter, a single award is issued to someone who has made a significant contribution to Indian cinema. It is essentially a lifetime achievement award. Jyothika did not win such an award. This award is typically given to an older person, someone who has dedicated their entire career to film. Please don't confuse this significant award with one of the many award mills that use Dadasaheb Phalke's name. See WP:DADASAHEB for more information. Thank you. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 05:42, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Again, stop fluffing up articles with non-notable award mill content like you have done again here. Read the above about these Dadasaheb Phalke award mills. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 14:30, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Cyphoidbomb:

What's the mistake of having that award in that article.It is a recognition for south stars at National Level.Why we hesitate to show them rather than hiding or removing southern star's achievements.What's the point??? Riya Iyer S Menon 19:60, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Competency[edit]

Re: this, if you continue to demonstrate a lack of competence, you will be blocked. It's getting really annoying having to clean up after you constantly. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 19:53, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Cyphoidbomb:

Sorry I didn't get you can you explain about it..Thanks for your valuable notes and advices.. Riya Iyer S Menon 19:56, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I know you don't understand, that's a major part of the problem, i.e. your lack of English competency. You have to be able to function here and communicate with other editors and understand the policies and guidelines of the English Wikipedia, which means that you need a stronger understanding of English. In the link above, you seem to not understand that the |birth_name= parameter is for the subject's full name. That's not acceptable.

And last warning re: edits like this. We do not use discussion forums or any source that is built by members of the general public. No IMDB, no blogs, no unverified twitter accounts, no Wikipedia, no fandom.com. See WP:RS and WP:ICTFSOURCES. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 22:42, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is yet another problem. In a section where we would theoretically talk aboug Keerthy Suresh's upcoming projects, you pasted content that tells us that she was not cast in something. And, you pasted it in the middle of an existing sentence. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 14:18, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violation[edit]

Re: this, you can't copy content from other sources as you did here. This is both plagiarism, it's also a copyright violation, as the content can be found verbatim here. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 22:42, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

January 2021[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 02:24, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

{{unblock|reason=why am blocked from editing for abuse of editing privileges???????? User talk:Cyphoidbomb are always behind me..no other is seen watchable as you do..i haven't done any violations or disruptive editing.i don't know what's the problem you have with me.Expecting for the unblock .I was blocked for silly reasons..making contributions isn't good nahh???}}(talk)02:29, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You were blocked for lacking the sufficient competency to edit at Wikipedia, which is somewhat evident in the malformed unblock request you posted above. Your lack of English skills makes it very difficult to communicate with you effectively, your contributions are rife with grammatical and typographical errors, you fail to understand that the Dadasaheb Phalke Award issued by the Indian government is not the same as the Dadasaheb Phalke Film Festival Award South, you keep using ampersands instead of the word "and", and in these edits (where we see some more examples of the above) you stole content about Ponmagal Vandhal that was almost identical to content found at TOI (among other sources). Do you need more examples:

Plot summary added here was copied from here. So you seem unaware of basic rules about plagiarism and copyright violations.
Here you don't know how to format a reference.
Here you apparently are unaware of WP:OVERLINK, since there's already a link to Shaji Kailas in that paragraph. It's also a strange choice to call him "Director Shaji" since that seems like it's his name, as opposed to "director Shaji", which describes what role he played, but you are also unaware that per WP:SURNAME (or more specifically, English grammar norms), we would refer to him by his surname, i.e. "director Kailas".
Here you again use "...stars...in lead roles" language despite previously being told that this is redundant.
Here you create a wikilink to Reality show for no clear reason. That just demonstrates that you don't understand how wikilinking works or why we use them.

And lastly, I'm not convinced that you're here to build a neutral encyclopedia. While some of your changes are constructive, it's become a real burden to have to hold your hand and explain everything that you're doing wrong, only to have you not understand what the problems are.

Cyphoidbomb (talk) 02:45, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Cyphoidbomb:,

Yes my English is very poor, as am from village side in south india, but you need to understand one (me) and make posssible of teaching or guiding me with better ways, rather than making arguments and disparaging or defaming ,continuosly over my lack of English over each of my edits in a very insulting manner repeatedly..each time....be a friend or convey in a friendly way.
In the case of Dadasaheb Phalke Award,I know that Dadasaheb Phalke Award issued by the Indian government is not the same as the Dadasaheb Phalke Film Festival Award South, I just removed that by replacing it with Dadasaheb Phalke Film Festival Award South. I provided it on the pages of some of the winners including Jyothika , Dhanush etc. But you keep removing it from the page Jyothika..Isn't she the winner of that award? Several reference says she is a winner.but when i provided it in her article about that you just undid / revetred all my edits to previous version...for a simple thing you just reverted my other contribution from that page... somewhere i feel a partiality towards your way of likings...also a page Dadasaheb Phalke International Film Festival Awards South was also created by someone...even after that why are you making south artists down...? They are too artists nah????

For Ponmagal vandhal ...when someone says about reviews regarding a movie or artist's performance...we mention that particle words or sentence in that article...you may be aware of this...also i have read and seen it in many of articles here...Then why you making problem in my case only?????????????????/

here In the case of Jyeshta (film) ,it was my mistake...i was unaware of basic rules about plagiarism and copyright violations...then mention me the basic rules... i will make my way of words to provide plot...

In the case of Valliettan providing a reference is a mistake.?It says about the remake movie Jyeshta (film), kannada version of Valliettan movie
Here , Shaji kailas not only a director...predominantly he works as director and known better for his direction, but also appeared in other roles behind the camera and infront too.

I already mentioned you in the case of doing edits over article Vani Bhojan, about the user; Eswnav , but each time you never made an attempt to block that user...but you are after me for several simple ( most of them were) mistakes... and blocked me purposefully... why??

Likewise you are simply avoiding and rejecting my other efforts here in a silly way...Effort is Effort...we all learn from mistakes...why can't you just guide me ...rather than rejecting , suppressing our passion towards here...??? And finally, I'm not convinced that you're here to make strong and right decisions, but making us discouraging...not yet tried to make us feel as a Better Guide, except a few good advices...

Thank you...Riya Iyer S Menon 14:04, 13 January 2021 (UTC) {{unblock|reason=Kindly Unblock me from my wikipedia edits, & I appologise for my mistakes..will not try to make mistakes..and guide me through out my passion. Awaiting for a positive response}}(talk) 20:14, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Help me[edit]

@Bonadea:, I was blocked from editing by User:Cyphoidbomb for the above reasons mentioed.PLease help me to unblock and further proceedings to remove my block. Can you please help in finding other major admins here..if you don't mind , mention their names her...please help me to unblock me soon

Also i wanna share a few things related to page Vani Bhojan. User:Eswnav restarted modifying that article and highlighting her again even warned several times..i mentioned this fan edit by that user, several times to User:Cyphoidbomb & others but, he / she doesn't even made any attempt to block User: Eswnav from that page or from editing.... but Cyphoidbomb followed me for each of my editings & blocked me for my minute mistakes...not even respected my words and my part ...please make immediate measures to unblock me ... i agrees some of them among might be mistakes...he/she (Cyphoidbomb) keeps torturing me mainly over, the name of my lack of english knowledge. Why can't he/she saw the best things i have contributed to wikipedia. Please help me to solve my problem. Riya Iyer S Menon, 20:14, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Riya Iyer S Menon, I saw that you were blocked and I am afraid I have to tell you that I understand the rationale and agree with it. I believe Cyphoidbomb has been very patient and has repeatedly explained why many of your edits have not been constructive. Cyphoidbomb even took the trouble of responding to your first attempted unblock request and explaining in some detail what some of the problems were. They also pointed out to you that your unblock request was not working because it was malformed, but your second request is malformed in the same way. If you do post an actual, working unblock request, all administrators will be able to see that you have done so, because all unblock requests from editors are listed at a special page. What was the problem with your request? You copied the code from the page source and included the "tlx" code which stops the request from showing up – in spite of the fact that the page source clearly instructs you not to include that part! As Cyphoidbomb points out, this is an example of the problems that led to your block in the first place. An editor who is not able to understand instructions and explanations may be blocked, not because the editor does not want to improve Wikipedia, but because because it takes so much time for other editors to help them, and fix the errors caused by their lack of understanding.

That your command of English is not strong is not a crime, it just makes it very hard for you to contribute well in an English-only context. Other editors may also be problematic but that is a different issue. If you create another unblock request you should not mention other editors, only explain how your own editing will change, and what you will do to avoid the same problems happening again. --bonadea contributions talk 10:24, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with Bonadea—not having a strong command of English is not a crime. We have many editors with limited English skills who still find ways to contribute constructively. But when these limitations impact your ability to understand community guidelines, to understand the warnings you've been given, and to communicate effectively with others, it becomes a problem. I don't think you are a bad person, Riya, and the block is not meant to be personal. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 18:28, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker) If you ever are unsure whether an edit is grammatically correct, you can always request the edit on the article's talk page, where other editors can see and if necessary improve your edits. Steve M (talk) 03:43, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment from Emmanuel joseph369[edit]

Regarding edits

Hi i request you to update box office collections in the wiki page of the movie TheGreatFather. Proof below http://www.catchnews.com/regional-cinema/the-great-father-uae-box-office-mammootty-starrer-mints-rs-10-5-crore-on-opening-weekend-fails-to-beat-mohanlal-s-pulimurugan-58119.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by Emmanuel joseph369 (talk • contribs) 14:56, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

My Mistake is accepted[edit]

{{unblock|reason= I understands my mistakes & i will try to be a good wikipedians with good edits. Also try to develop and improve my English Language. Please Unblock me and Guide me as well for my good path here. Thank you all who all pointed out me and made me understand my mistakes.}} 10:20, 02 February 2021 (UTC)

This your third unblock request that isn't formatted properly. Each time you submit an incorrectly-formatted unblock request, despite the fact that two editors explained that you didn't format it correctly, just highlights your inability to follow directions or edit at the English Wikipedia constructively, regardless of your heart-felt intentions. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 05:30, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Riya Iyer S Menon you need to stop harassing other users to unblock you. Even if you saying you done a mistake but still you are not getting away with this. So please just go and do something else rather than coming here and harassing and making personal attacks at other users to unblock you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A01:4C8:41:2AA:4CCB:21DF:BF17:F27B (talk) 12:14, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]