User talk:Richard75/Archive 2022

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Nomination of The March of the Millennia for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The March of the Millennia is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The March of the Millennia until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Orange Mike | Talk 14:34, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

List of English monarchs[edit]

Hello, I saw you reverted my edits to the List of English Monarchs you said in your edit summary that the reason you reverted it is because we should be using coronation portraits when available. All the images that I changed weren’t coronation portraits. I merely changed the image for a better higher quality image of just a nicer looking image. So the reason you gave for reverting makes no sense. Orson12345 (talk) 20:34, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ANI[edit]

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Curbon7 (talk) 08:32, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • n.b. I didn't start this ANI, I'm just the clerk. I'm notifying you because the reporter neglected to do so. Curbon7 (talk) 08:32, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 22[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Simon Davis (artist), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page National Portrait Gallery.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:10, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wednesday June 8, 11am-5pm: New York Botanical Garden - Environment of the Bronx - Editing Wikipedia for Beginners

The LuEsther T. Mertz Library of the New York Botanical Garden and the Environment of New York City Task Force invite the general public of all experience levels to come to the Mertz Library in person and learn how to use Wikipedia! All skill levels welcome at the event! Experienced Wikipedia editors from the Wikimedia New York City chapter will be in attendance and available to help. A one hour training session will be offered at the start of this event covering introductory topics. Attendees familiar with editing Wikipedia can edit off of a worklist focused on the environment of New York City; as well as, a sub-list focused on the environment of the Bronx. The Mertz Library will pull topical media from their collection to assist the editing.

--Wikimedia New York City Team via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:08, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)

NYC Wiknic, June 26[edit]

Hold the date. Meetup/NYC Wiknic in Crotona Park, Sunday June 26.

Watch Wikipedia:Meetup/NYC/Wiknic June 2022 for further details as they become available.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:33, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

June 22, 7pm: ONLINE WikiWednesday Salon NYC
Welcome to Wikimedia New York City!

You are invited to join the Wikimedia NYC community for our monthly "WikiWednesday" evening salon (7-8pm) and knowledge-sharing workshop. To join the meeting from your computer or smartphone, just visit the Zoom link on the meetup page.

We look forward to seeing local Wikimedians, but would also like to invite folks from the greater New York metropolitan area (and beyond!) who might not typically be able to join us in person!

If there's a project you'd like to share or a question you'd like answered, just let us know by adding it to the agenda or the talk page.

7:00pm - 8:00 pm online via Zoom (optional breakout rooms from 8:00-8:30)

(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)

--Wikimedia New York City Team 14:51, 21 June 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of List of condemned Roman emperors for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of condemned Roman emperors is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of condemned Roman emperors until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Aza24 (talk) 21:46, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Zandar, Zarana, and Zartan[edit]

Hello, I was given your name by another editor I had been discussing this issue with, as they said you had "exceptional judgement and experience with regard to comics" that they had seen. In a nutshell, there is an editing war occurring with these three pages (all characters from the G.I. Joe franchise, if you don't already know), regarding biographical information that exists in some, but not all, iterations of the characters. One person is demanding that the profiles remain as they currently exist, while the other is insisting that information that only exists in one iteration should only be included in that iterations sub-section, not within the main profile section. I have offered the compromise of including information that pertains to the majority (or all) of the iterations, but neither party is willing to budge. As an uninvolved party, I would be curious to hear your opinion and whether or not you think I should bring this issue to the Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Comics or to the attention of a moderator? DarkLordMordred (talk) 09:43, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Tour of Duty (Judge Dredd story) for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tour of Duty (Judge Dredd story) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tour of Duty (Judge Dredd story) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 09:00, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unincorporated associations[edit]

Hi

I've realised I've re-inserted equivalent material to the stuff you removed at this edit [[1]].

I think it should be in there: under the law of partnerships, which afaik is the same in all former British colonies, if the purpose of an association is profit then it is ipso facto a partnership (not an association). Partnerships are also unincorporated, but the big difference is that liability of partners is unlimited through their mutual guarantee - whereas the mere members of an association are often protected from the liabilities incurred by the committee.

This doesn't stop an association trading, even to generate a surplus, but this surplus (~profit) must not be the purpose of the association, or it ceases to be one.

Any thoughts on this?

Thanks, Eteb3 (talk) 19:55, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

British monarch's consent[edit]

At Succession to the British throne, I don't think Elizabeth II is able to give her consent anymore, concerning the first six in the line. PS - I know the 'source' says "her", but I think we can allow updating the note. GoodDay (talk) 23:28, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of The Pit (Judge Dredd story) for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Pit (Judge Dredd story) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Pit (Judge Dredd story) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 17:46, 8 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You didn't like the edits I'd made on List of English monarchs a couple months ago. I've tried something similar but cleaner this time, with less space taken up with reference breaks and it should look nicer. I'm trying to make it look simple and elegant like List of British monarchs and List of Scottish monarchs. What do you think? —GoldRingChip 20:13, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Mutants (Judge Dredd storyline) for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mutants (Judge Dredd storyline) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mutants (Judge Dredd storyline) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 04:19, 17 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]