User talk:Riccardo.fabris

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Proposed Khmer settlement in present day Malaysia[edit]

http://www.nature-escapes-kuala-lumpur.com/Tasik-Chini-freshwater-swamp.html#khmer http://www.journeymalaysia.com/ML_chini.htm http://www.khmerlife.com/Blog/Blog.aspx?BlogID=65657 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.59.121.39 (talk) 20:17, 25 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Harshavarman III-20x50px.png listed for deletion[edit]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Harshavarman III-20x50px.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. OsamaKReply? on my talk page, please 12:29, 24 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Phnom Kulen & Phnom Kulen National Park[edit]

I have not been able to find a map of the National Park. It would be useful to know which archaeological sites fall within the park precincts and whether the National Park encompasses the whole massif. Formerly I transferred the Phnom Kulen National Park "Archaeological sites" section to the Phnom Kulen article because the main purpose of National Parks is to protect wildlife and natural features. On the other hand the Phnom Kulen article has a geographic angle. I deem that the archeological sites, including the quarries, as man-made structures rooted on ancient settlements, fall within the geographic scope and are unrelated to waterfalls or flora and fauna protection. Xufanc (talk) 12:34, 2 June 2010 (UTC) The Phnom Kulen National Park article needs a section on the endangered and vulnerable animals and plants protected by the National Park.Xufanc (talk) 09:09, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Rotanio[edit]

Lack of sources doesn't mean that there aren't any or that it's a blatant hoax. This isn't the type of hoax that is meant by the criterion — it means things such as "Rotanio is a friend of Captain Jack Sparrow" that anyone can see to be false. However, the total lack of sources means that a BLP prod is appropriate; I've added it to the article. Nyttend (talk) 00:20, 5 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:12, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]