User talk:Rhasheene

License tagging for Image:Alvin Live.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Alvin Live.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 21:05, 29 September 2006 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:AlvinFields.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:AlvinFields.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 21:05, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Rha_rha_much.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Rha_rha_much.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 10:04, 3 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Rhadeedah3.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Rhadeedah3.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 09:35, 5 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced tag on Alvin Fields[edit]

Hello, I see you have removed the tag from the Alvin Fields article twice now. Please do not remove this tag until the article is properly referenced from verifiable sources. Because this article appears to be a biography of a living person we have to make sure all facts presented are properly cited from verifiable sources. The article as it is now does not give any sources. Stardust8212 20:29, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Alvin Fields[edit]

A tag has been placed on Alvin Fields, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. ttonyb (talk) 02:04, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism[edit]

This edit was little better than vandalism. Please:

shorten your rant
add it at the bottom of the page
without deleting existing messages

and Phil may reply to you. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 07:24, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Alvin Fields[edit]

I'm sorry if you are upset about the deletion of Alvin Field's page. There is a mechanism for the review of a page deletion. Feel free to bring up your case at WP:DELREV. As for the bit about the lounge singer, that was a direct quote from a review in the Providence Journal, see the fifth link here. J04n(talk page) 09:57, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I removed your comment from Talk:Jimmy Wales because that is for discussion of an article. Please be aware that long complaints are rarely effective, and it is totally unhelpful to mention the speedy deletion of an article to Jimbo Wales since he had nothing to do with it. Johnuniq (talk) 10:41, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You should create your bio in user:Rhasheene/snabdox. Links to YouTube are pointless - they are not evidence of notability. Other links should not have naked URLs. Then raise the matter at deletion review. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 08:02, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

DRV again[edit]

You ask by e-mail re an article on Alvin Fields. Despite your blatant COI, I will give you some advice:

create the British Rock Symphony article - this will provide an extra blue link in the article about Alvin
convert User:Rhasheene/Alvin Fields into a proper article. In particular, it must include links to significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources.
raise the matter again at deletion review, in a less cack-handed manner than this horror.

— RHaworth (talk · contribs) 18:40, 19 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]