User talk:Resource sharing

Welcome[edit]

Hello, Resource sharing, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! Doug Weller talk 15:37, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Introduction Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia
Finding your way around
Table of contents Directories and indexes Department directory
Editing articles
How to develop an article Simplified Manual of Style

Getting help
Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Our help forum for new editors, the Teahouse The Help Desk, for more advanced questions Help pages Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
How you can help
Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

October 2020[edit]

Your recent editing history at Medes shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Doug Weller talk 18:36, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, are you sure you have reviewed the page? You sound determined, but I converted it to the old version of the page. HistoryofIran User deleted the resource from the page for no reason when it was supposed to restore the page to its old version Resource sharing (talk) 19:17, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I ask you to check the old version of the page, I reverted the page to the old version. Resource sharing (talk) 19:17, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

[1] As you can see here, there was "Hethum" information before.But Blocked user Armanqur Deleted after making this change[2] As you can see here[3], the writing of Hethum existed before. Resource sharing (talk) 12:44, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Since you say Admins accepted your edit, I expect you to name them on the article talk page[edit]

So that we can make sure that they did. As for "staff", what in the world are you talking about? Doug Weller talk 18:39, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Staff: Admin, Wikipedia Managers Resource sharing (talk) 19:12, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Huh? Who are "Wikipedia Managers". And I'm certainly not "staff". Doug Weller talk 07:49, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

[4] As you can see here, there was "Hethum" information before.But Blocked user Armanqur Deleted after making this change[5] As you can see here[6], the writing of Hethum existed before. Resource sharing (talk) 12:36, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

October 2020[edit]

Hello, I'm Austronesier. I noticed that you made a comment on the page Talk:Medes that didn't seem very civil, so it has been removed. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. This[7] definitely crossed the line. @Doug Weller: FYI. Austronesier (talk) 08:05, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

[8] As you can see here, there was "Hethum" information before.But Blocked user Armanqur Deleted after making this change[9] As you can see here[10], the writing of Hethum existed before. Resource sharing (talk) 12:35, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of noticeboard discussion[edit]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Doug Weller talk 08:10, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Can i defend myself in Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard? Resource sharing (talk) 13:41, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Absolutely! That is kind of the point. Just make sure you use policy-based arguments. --T*U (talk) 13:46, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

So can I defend myself? Resource sharing (talk) 13:58, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, but you should hurry before you find yourself blocked... --T*U (talk) 14:03, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

[11] As you can see here, there was "Hethum" information before.But Blocked user Armanqur Deleted after making this change[12] As you can see here[13], the writing of Hethum existed before. Resource sharing (talk) 12:34, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Salt Bae[edit]

Please comment at Talk:Salt Bae#Ethnicity. --T*U (talk) 13:05, 2 October 2020 (UTC) I am unfortunately unable to answer you as I am currently in another discussion, but we can talk here.You can check the pages of many celebrities, such as "German-born Kurdish origin" spellings are available everywhere. Resource sharing (talk) 13:11, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion has nothing to do here in your user talk page, it has to be in the Talk:Salt Bae page. I have challenged your edit and explained that you are breaking Wikipedia rules. Unless you are willing to read and follow Wikipedia rules (and discuss with others when there are disagreements), you have nothing to do in Wikipedia. --T*U (talk) 13:18, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is your opinion, but you cannot restore the page by making negative changes. Resource sharing (talk) 13:30, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unless you can support your position on the basis of Wikipedia rules in the article talk page, your edit will have to be reverted. As simple as that. --T*U (talk) 13:49, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No, you misunderstood, the accepted change of mine is not your change, So you are the user who needs to be approved on the talk page Resource sharing (talk) 13:55, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

What accepted change of yours??? Please explain when, where and by whom your addition of ethnicity in the lede sentence against Wikipedia guidelines was "accepted". --T*U (talk) 14:02, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you look at the Page History you will see that this change has been approved. Resource sharing (talk) 14:03, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

October 2020[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for tendentious editing.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Salvio

14:14, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I think it's not right to be blocked[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Resource sharing (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

First of all, I do not find it right to be blocked for an indefinite period of time and to block this userArmanqur for 1 week. What is my reason for being blocked? Is it because I call it fascist for these words[[14]]? Words: @Dirokakurdi: IT's not a surprise that you guys think that Hamma Mirwaisi is a reliable source. Seriously, good luck to all of you on perpetuating your pseudo-history. Armanqur (talk) 22:55, 1 October 2020 (UTC) and how can who makes negative changes and is a blocked user Armanqir who says derogatory words, complain about me ? and how can the Austronesier who clearly defended him report me? user Armanqur has clearly deleted a previously existing resource[15] I re-added this previously existing resource why am I being blocked? Evidence that it already existed:[16]Resource sharing (talk) 14:39, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 14:49, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Hello, thank you for your answer, but I think you do not know exactly the case, if you want to examine the subject, I will share it to you in turn. Resource sharing (talk) 14:54, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

For a clear understanding of the subject, I am sharing respectively: Incident 1: First of all, the events started when the user "Armanqur" started to damage the "Medes" page. First damage attack: [17] As you can see Armanqur deleted resources and information. Incident 2: Armanqur repeatedly damaged the Medes page: [18], [19], [20], [21] Incident 3: After making these negative changes Administrators realized this and reverted the changes[22]. Incident 4: "Armanqur" continued to make these negative changes again:[23], [24] Incident 5: When I noticed these negative changes, I undone these changes:[25] Incident 6: On the discussion page Armanqur said "so-called history" about the history of the Kurds[26] , Against this rhetoric of Armanqur I had to call him a fascist, because he clearly insulted a nationality. Incident 7: After these events, an user clearly defended this user[27] And this user clearly called me "ignorant". After all these events, it is not me who caused the confusion and damaged the pages, I tried to restore the pages. After all, it is not right to be shown as the culprit of these events.I consider it unfair that I am blocked indefinitely and the user who does them is blocked for 1 week.If I wanted to damage Wikipedia, I would do it 17 days ago when I first opened Wikipedia... Resource sharing (talk) 15:26, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I objected and I am waiting for an answer, please reply Resource sharing (talk) 17:13, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It doesn't look like they're going to revoke your ban any time soon. Armanqur (talk) 02:33, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Good job buddy, you won a Persian or Turkish award Resource sharing (talk) 16:41, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You're not going to get very far in academia with racism such as that. 64.46.27.23 (talk) 22:55, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]