User talk:Rdp060707

	; Archives (Index) ;
	2021/January; 2021/February; 2021/March; 2021/April; 2021/May; 2021/June; 2021/July; 2021/August; 2021/September; 2021/October; 2021/November; 2021/December; 2022/February; 2022/May; 2022/September; 2022/November; 2022/December; 2023/January; 2023/May; 2023/September; 2023/November; 2024/April;
	This page is archived by ClueBot III.

Welcome to my talk page. If I made a mistake, or you have any questions, please leave a message. I will be happy to help.

Please read the rules below:

BE in good faith!

NO personal attacks!

NO vandalism.

Also, please make your comments related to the encyclopedia. Don't forget to sign your comments. New messages must be at the bottom, not on the top. Thank you for your attention!

Beware! This user's talk page is monitored by talk page watchers. Some of them even talk back.

james laine is criticised for his non sense use of jokes in a history book, why you are avoiding it — Preceding unsigned comment added by 112.133.232.132 (talk) 18:29, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I dont believe I made a change to anything 74.116.47.26 (talk) 05:59, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I was just wondering if the image of Baháʼu'lláh could be removed from the page on Baháʼu'lláh. Baha'i's are asked to not distribute images of Baháʼu'lláh so it would be greatly appreciated if it could be removed from this page. here is a message from the Universal House of Justice regarding the matter of Baháʼu'lláh's image: "It is apparent in letters written on behalf of the Guardian that he did not approve the publication of any photograph of Bahá'u'lláh, and regarded such publication to be offensive to religious feeling. Nor did he approve that the photograph be exposed openly to the public, even in Bahá'í homes. Only on special occasions did he permit the photograph to be displayed, and then he urged that it be done with the utmost reverence."

Thank you for your understanding! 2600:1009:B02D:BD65:E929:3791:494:7778 (talk) 15:44, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]