User talk:Rbunnage
Hey Richard, I'm interested in your thoughts on "intentional living". Are there any particular resources you are leaning on to get things off the ground (i.e. books, magazine articles..)? Jwiley80 16:09, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Wikipedia:WikiProject Intentional Living/Intro, by Warlordjohncarter, another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Wikipedia:WikiProject Intentional Living/Intro fits the criteria for speedy deletion for the following reason:
To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Wikipedia:WikiProject Intentional Living/Intro, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note, this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Wikipedia:WikiProject Intentional Living/Intro itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 01:34, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
Re: deletion of Intentional living[edit]
Hello - thanks for the message. I deleted the article because it was proposed for deletion on 2007-07-15, and the tag was not removed during the five-day proposed deletion period. I did not nominate the article – User:SnowFire did, and I simply deleted the article as an administrator. Just fyi, the nomination concern (which you can also find in the article's history) was:
"Neologism - what isn't intentional living? Few Google hits. So little activity a redlinked main page link to a MFD'ed Wikiproject remained for a month and a half. Reads like an essay. References have nothing to do with article.
I have restored the article at your request and have removed the prod tag. However, if the article is not improved, the next step is an articles for deletion discussion, which anyone may initiate at any time. If I could offer a suggestion, it would be to find verifiable, reliable sources for the article – and remove the dictionary definitions, as those aren't really acceptable as the sole references for an encyclopedia article. Happy editing – KrakatoaKatie 04:06, 26 July 2007 (UTC)