User talk:Rboxer

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Unfounded allegation of harassment[edit]

Please don't harrass me. I will report you to my friend and adminstrator, LOL. Be forewarned, friend. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 70.92.175.102 (talkcontribs).

I’m neither the friend of this anon nor a Wikipedia administrator. This delayed blocking is troublesome. —LOL 10:31, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]


I don't harass anyone, I have reasonably posted my comments towards articles on each user page. Please provide a signature as I am not aware of who this is i am speaking to --Rboxer 10:29, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you LOL. I suspected this was fictious as he was accusing me of harrasment for posting a warning due to vandalism to a Wikipedia entry --Rboxer 10:33, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. I noticed from your list of contributions that you may be a new editor. If that’s the case, welcome to the project. In case you don’t know, you can click on the history tab (beside edit this page) to view the edits to a page, and find out who posted any unsigned messages. —LOL 10:45, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, missed that one! Greatly appreciated --Rboxer 10:46, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Any time. You can also view the block log of any user. Just go their user/talk page, click "User contributions" on the left (third point under the search box), and click the "Block log" (in small print) near the user's contributions page. Or, you could go to Special:Log, select "Block log" in the drop menu, and put in User:Username (in this case, User:70.92.175.102) *after "Title:". —LOL 10:58, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Penshawmonument.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Penshawmonument.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 12:07, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Uploaded in error, nominated for deletion--Rboxer 14:56, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]


I took the decision to remove the following quote from the article as I believed it was just waffle and a personal attack on Netto. As quoted on the talk page this is an encyclopedia not a local newspaper

The cause has not yet been identified but it is believed to have been started by a faulty heater. The fire broke out at around 4am and firefighters from around the area were called to battle the flames. The fire was not completely put out until about 12pm. It is not yet known whether the building will be demolished and rebuilt. Netto is famously associated with good value but there is a definite negative connotation linked to the supermarket chain associated with cheapness, being mainly a food shop for the lower working class. It is becoming very popular with schoolchildren who often claim that a fellow classmate shops there, as to insult the receiver (due to Netto being known for its cheapness).

Please let me know underneath if you disagree/agree. Thanks --Rboxer 11:26, 13 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

RC Patrol-related Proposals in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey[edit]

Greetings Recent Changes Patrollers!

This is a one-time-only message to inform you about technical proposals related to Recent Changes Patrol in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey that I think you may be interested in reviewing and perhaps even voting for:

  1. Adjust number of entries and days at Last unpatrolled
  2. Editor-focused central editing dashboard
  3. "Hide trusted users" checkbox option on watchlists and related/recent changes (RC) pages
  4. Real-Time Recent Changes App for Android
  5. Shortcut for patrollers to last changes list

Further, there are more than 20 proposals related to Watchlists in general that you may be interested in reviewing. (and over 260 proposals in all, across many aspects of wikis)

Thank you for your consideration. Please note that voting for proposals continues through December 12, 2016.

Note: You received this message because you have transcluded {{User wikipedia/RC Patrol}} (user box) on your user page. Since this message is "one-time-only" there is no opt out for future mailings.

Best regards, SteviethemanDelivered: 01:09, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]