User talk:Rao Lakshya Pratap Singh

March 2023[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 13:48, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rao Lakshya Pratap Singh (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The information on Battle of Mandan is absolutely wrong . The actual forces of Rao Mittersen was 6000 and Sardul Thakur was 15000. And still there is village named Mandan in which Mittersen settled many villages of Ahirs now known as Rao Sahab as the battle was won by Rao Mittersen . Due to which Rao annexed large area of Rajputana which is today also come under Ahirwal. So you are requested to block my id but delete this wikipedia page which absolutely wrong and contradictory historical facts.

Thanks

I hope you will take positive step.... Rao Lakshya Pratap Singh (talk) 15:22, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You don't seem to be asking to be unblocked. We don't delete articles via unblock requests; if you wish to be unblocked, please tell what was wrong with your editing, what you will do differently, and what productive edits you intend to make. 331dot (talk) 16:02, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your initial statement should replace the words "your reason here", as I've done here for you. 331dot (talk) 16:02, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]