User talk:RandomPerson137

Speedy deletion nomination of Beardmore Crane

Hello RandomPerson137,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Beardmore Crane for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. NHCLS (talk) 21:04, 12 December 2014 (UTC)

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 21:21, 12 December 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Beardmore Crane

The article Beardmore Crane has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of satisfying Wikipedia's notability guidelines

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 21:21, 12 December 2014 (UTC)

Come for a visit at the Teahouse!!!

Hello! RandomPerson137, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!

Disambiguation link notification for December 30

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Forth Bridge, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Caisson. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:56, 30 December 2014 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:History of WHL viaducts/doc

Template:History of WHL viaducts/doc has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:38, 1 January 2015 (UTC)

I have subst;ed the relevant portion. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 01:34, 2 January 2015 (UTC)

WHR Common text

I agree with you.

I've made {{Common passage}} as it's a situation that may crop again. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 01:50, 2 January 2015 (UTC)

Thanks, and sorry for the confusion. RandomPerson137 (talk) 10:20, 2 January 2015 (UTC)

And for some reason, the Draft version (which seems to now be a fork) has been retained in addition to the template. :( Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:54, 2 January 2015 (UTC)

MfD nomination of Draft:History of WHL viaducts

Draft:History of WHL viaducts, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:History of WHL viaducts and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Draft:History of WHL viaducts during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Andy Dingley (talk) 11:13, 2 January 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Creag-an-Arnain Viaduct, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fort William. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 6 January 2015 (UTC)

Blackhall Bridge

Just to let you know I nipped up to Scotland on Wednesday and got a pic of the Aqueduct we dicussed. I have referenced it on the Paisley Canal Line page; if you want to use it, you're welcome; you can copy the code from there. Best wishes. Afterbrunel (talk) 20:38, 9 January 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for the image - sorry for the mayfly accounts. Ostrichyearning (talk) 23:11, 23 January 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:07, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Template:Con listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Template:Con. Since you had some involvement with the Template:Con redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 09:19, 28 November 2015 (UTC)