User talk:Rajuseoindia

Speedy deletion nomination of Talk:Siddharthaa Sawansukha

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

A tag has been placed on Talk:Siddharthaa Sawansukha, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an acceptable page. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item G11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this page is not blatant advertising, . Clicking that button will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. You are welcome to edit the page to fix this problem, but please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. As well as removing promotional phrasing, it helps to add factual encyclopaedic information to the page, and add citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the page will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Rajuseoindia (talk) 09:59, 28 March 2014 (UTC)

Why was your page deleted

The page was nominated for deletion since it had a promotional or advertising tone. You are welcome to create new articles! See Wikipedia:Your first article. But remember, it will be deleted if you the article is not adhering to the guidelines. --11:11, 28 March 2014 (UTC) Fauzan^{✆ talk} _{✉ email}

March 2014

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add soapboxing, promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Shrikanthv (talk) 11:25, 28 March 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of Sawansukha Jewellers for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sawansukha Jewellers is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sawansukha Jewellers (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Shrikanthv (talk) 11:27, 28 March 2014 (UTC)

Unauthorised removal of AFD tag and maintenance tags

In this edit you removed an AFD tag and a number of maintenance tags from Sawansukha Jewellers. You had already been warned about inappropriate removal from Wikipedia. In the notification of the AFD for that article you were specifically warned "do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article", and you had already been warned not to remove maintenance tags without addressing the problems, and all this after numerous previous warnings. You have been warned about the consequences of your continually disruptive conduct, so a block from editing is now likely. - David Biddulph (talk) 13:53, 28 March 2014 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Rajuseoindia. You have new messages at Passengerpigeon's talk page.
Message added 01:49, 29 March 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Passengerpigeon (talk) 01:49, 29 March 2014 (UTC)

Block

There has been a problem with this account: the account has been used for paid editing as per https://www.fiverr.com/rajuseoindia for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to Wikipedia's content policy. I have therefore blocked you indefinitely.

You may request an unblock. To do so, post the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In this reason, you must:

• Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
• Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

If you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 16:52, 14 March 2016 (UTC)