User talk:REMANENCE

Dimitri parant[edit]

Your addition to Dimitri parant has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other websites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Hairhorn (talk) 19:24, 22 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Dimitri parant[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Dimitri parant requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Reichsfürst (talk) 22:52, 22 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your question on my talk page. I deleted this article because, in my opinion, the artist in question is not notable in wikipedic terms. Please in future add messages only to the bottom of talk-pages. --Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 16:40, 23 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It has also been suggested that the article breaches copyright law, although that was not a factor in my deletion decision. But it may become a factor if you re-create the article; please read WP:COPYVIO and bear this in mind. --Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 16:44, 23 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

June 2011[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Reichsfürst, you may be blocked from editing. Please don't vandalise user pages Reichsfürst (talk) 14:21, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]