User talk:Qwertyus/archive6

Big Structure

Thanks for letting me know of your request to delete this page. I guess I can understand why you have suggested some references be deleted (though I believe the SVM stuff is directly related), but I don't understand why or the rationale for the entire article deletion. I will study more closely and respond directly on the article Talk page. At any rate, I appreciate the courtesy to notify me. Mkbergman (talk) 01:30, 8 December 2014 (UTC)

Strong Mad

Strong Mad from Homestar Runner, like the previous examples of Hitmonlee and Gossamer (Looney Tunes) on Headless men, is a headless cartoon character. --BenStein69 (talk) 17:20, 30 October 2014 (UTC)

Ok. Maybe we should put descriptions into the "see also" section (or trim it, it's becoming a list of trivia). QVVERTYVS (hm?) 21:54, 30 October 2014 (UTC)

Proding pidof

Just courtesy call to say that I cam across the pidof article and have added a {{Prod-2}} tag. --wintonian ^talk 02:37, 6 November 2014 (UTC)

[Qwertyus -- this a copy of something I've just shared with Dragan -- dig it!!!] My friend Dragan! First of all, I see that you have been recognized by one of my few other Wikipedia buddies QWERTYVS [or is it QWERTYUS ?]; and so I draw your joint attention to the anomalous Wikipedia entry on the movie "Red Planet Mars", which movie (which I have just viewed on Youtube) was a quite heartfelt and anomalous comment on the possibility that compassion is a universal reality! But the Wikipedia entry itself is way, way out there! Synchronist (talk) 05:33, 10 November 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited MINPACK, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page SIAM. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:58, 10 November 2014 (UTC)

Date format in Linux articles

Hello! Any chances, please, for you to have a look at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Software § Date format in release history sections of Linux articles and possibly comment there by providing your point of view? The whole thing is pretty much poorly discussed with only a few editors actually discussing it, while it seems to be affecting more than a few articles (and the date format seems to be extending beyond the tables into references, please see history of the Linux distribution article). Any contributions to the discussion would be highly appreciated! — Dsimic (talk | contribs) 02:39, 15 November 2014 (UTC)

Your comment at Talk:Hpcc systems

Sorry, I didn't understand what you meant. I've deleted the article anyway. Deb (talk) 09:06, 21 November 2014 (UTC)

I figured it would be a likely redirect. I reused one of the sources (but not the article text) to improve HPCC. QVVERTYVS (hm?) 10:22, 21 November 2014 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	for dawoodi bohra succession issue Summichum (talk) 15:26, 21 November 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Pure existence theorem of algorithm, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Decidable. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 00:52, 23 November 2014 (UTC)

Reference Errors on 25 November

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Support vector machine page, your edit caused an unsupported parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:47, 26 November 2014 (UTC)

Thanks, Dear

I am thankful for you for correcting and showing the correct way of editing done by me. I am sorry, I was really very aggressive and it is but natural that I was so inclined toward DB article that it looked like doing partisan activity. I being declared DB, I have disadvantage and I should have taken extra care of that factor before doing any editing that I should avoid making comments which depict doing favours without any Wikipedian proof, and now after succession controversy, I should have learnt that I don't have now any rights to do good faith editing on DB articles at least.

Aggressive actions by a specific editor has given me opportunity to learn the fact, but I also thanks him also for teaching me a lesson, but let me warned him that Wiki have system and fellow editors like you, user:Anupmehra, User:Occultzone , any many more including admin involved, will not allow him the activity which he started doing aggressively after 29th Nov, deleting well sourced material of his dislike and adding material of own controlled partisan websites of his favour.--Md iet (talk) 04:32, 4 December 2014 (UTC)

Dear Qwertyus, As usual Summichum is bent upon doing disruptive activities. As per wiki guidlines I am not allowed to participate in this process, may please visit WP:AN3 notice board, he is complaining the issue for which he is at fault as per my assessment. If you feel that Summichum activities are not as per wiki guidelines, may please like to act accordingly and support.--Md iet (talk) 06:27, 8 December 2014 (UTC)

Urgent Attention

You have been diligently monitoring and maintaining the the Articles related to Dawoodi Bohra and doing wonderful job at that. you have been in contact of all the editors who have taken efforts to edit this article. this article has gone through several editwars. by now you must have realized the SPA of User summichum. his vandalism has increased recently. I feel that user summichum should also be topicblocked.Rukn950 (talk) 08:28, 21 December 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Bradley–Terry model

Harrias ^talk 12:01, 21 December 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Unix, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Portability. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:40, 29 December 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Work stealing, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Multithreading. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:35, 5 January 2015 (UTC)

James Heilman2

I am needing a work space in main space for a few hours. Best Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 16:54, 5 January 2015 (UTC)

Mwetoolkit

The subject article was PRODed by yourself - it has been restored as a contested PROD. You may wish to consider WP:AfD in the light of this result. - see also User_talk:Ronhjones#Mwetoolkit_page_deletion Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 19:34, 7 January 2015 (UTC)

Template:Did you know nominations/1967 Opium War

Hello,

Thank you for your interest in the above nomination. I have added comment to address your concerns.

Georgejdorner (talk) 02:05, 8 January 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited SXML, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page SAX. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 12 January 2015 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Thanks for your all efforts you are putting into Dawoodi Bohra related articles to raise and maintain their encyclopedic standard. Please keep the good works up! See you around. :) Anupmehra -Let's talk! 13:40, 19 January 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: OpenKM

Hello Qwertyus. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of OpenKM, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: i've removed the features list which is probably the spammiest part. . Thank you. GedUK  12:51, 23 January 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: DynPG

Hello Qwertyus. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of DynPG, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: It's not promotional. Take to AfD as youo can't A7 software. Thank you. GedUK  12:51, 23 January 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Analysis of PRAM algorithms, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Processor. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:38, 26 January 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Work stealing

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 31 January 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited History of Unix, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mainframe. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Hi, I'm Scarce2. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Clay county sheriff office indiana, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you. Scarce2 (talk) 21:16, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

Yes, those sections need citations

but it is simply too extreme to delete the entire sections. Serendi^podous 17:27, 7 February 2015 (UTC)

This is in response to my edits on Phrases from The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy. Serendipodous, these phrases have been listed since at least February 2010 without any reliable sources, so there's been amply opportunity to add them. QVVERTYVS (hm?) 17:39, 7 February 2015 (UTC)

Biometric Devices

I certainly do not wish to start an edit war, but I do believe it was inappropriate to delete my stub article without discussion.

I quote from your reference:

"Both dictionary entries at Wiktionary and encyclopedia articles at Wikipedia may start out as stubs, but they are works in progress, to be expanded. Wikipedia articles should begin with a good definition, but they should provide other types of information about that topic as well. The full articles that Wikipedia's stubs grow into are very different from dictionary entries."

I should think that, given your concerns, you might have tagged the article with {{Dicdef}}.

This article is meant to discuss the specifics of Biometric devices, a topic frequently mentioned in other WP articles.

The Biometric topic does not mention biometric devices, but rather the measurements made by such devices.

I believe my article should be reverted back to the original that I created and researched.

Without discussion I will revert it back and ask for arbitration.

Softtest123 (talk) 21:47, 7 February 2015 (UTC)

@Softtest123:, you're always free to revert and expand the article; see WP:BRD. QVVERTYVS (hm?) 22:46, 7 February 2015 (UTC)

Actually, I just reverted it myself. The list of example devices makes this more than a DICDEF. Sorry, I shouldn't have reverted here. QVVERTYVS (hm?) 22:58, 7 February 2015 (UTC)

Thank you. Perhaps my students will add more material. I will encourage them to do so. I will if and when I have time. Softtest123 (talk) 23:17, 7 February 2015 (UTC)

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Hi, I'm Lakun.patra. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Conyca Geodrone, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you. Lakun.patra (talk) 13:57, 9 February 2015 (UTC)

BST consistency checking

I saw your edits to the binary search tree article, which are cool, and I thought I’d add a comment: when I have a data structure with some complex invariant that has to be maintained over time, such as the BST ordering condition, it’s often useful to have code to check whether that invariant holds or not. That way, when my code doesn’t work, I can check to see if it’s because the invariant of that data structure is getting broken, or for some other reason; and by invoking that code repeatedly, I can find out when it is getting broken.

Not that this belongs in the article; I just thought you might be interested in when someone might run into this problem outside of problem sets. Kragen Javier Sitaker (talk) 05:57, 10 February 2015 (UTC)

1RR

You have violated the 1RR restriction applicable to all articles dealing with the Israeli-Palestinian conflict on Death of Binyamin Meisner. I suggest you step away from that article for a while. Brad Dyer (talk) 20:04, 24 February 2015 (UTC)

I will, after I've responded to your comment. Thank you for the heads up. QVVERTYVS (hm?) 20:15, 24 February 2015 (UTC)

Template:Did you know nominations/1967 Opium War

Hello,

You began a review of the above; your last edit was on 8 January. Nomination comments have been pending since 9 February. Are you going to complete your review, or should the nomination be put up for review by another editor?

Georgejdorner (talk) 04:05, 25 February 2015 (UTC)

Discrimination in Ghana

Please be patient, the article is still in development and the edit conflict its causing is not helping. Best Regards—Masssly^✉ 13:20, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

Identifier Network

I'm fine with userfication instead of deletion.
I think that might be the best. If that's the outcome, I will volunteer to explain to the author what we need.

(And a merger would have to be done anyway; it's no use having ~8 articles all discussing the same research project.)
Definitely. And those formulas will have to go too. – Margin1522 (talk) 14:16, 2 March 2015 (UTC)

@Margin1522: That'd be great! QVVERTYVS (hm?) 16:29, 2 March 2015 (UTC)

About your change to "Performance Analyzer"

I think if you want to remove the content of "Performance Analyzer", you need to remove all similar pages, like https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/VTune

This is regarding the change below: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Performance_Analyzer&diff=644580065&oldid=643902793 — Preceding unsigned comment added by FancyIX (talk • contribs) 20:05, 3 March 2015 (UTC)

At least that page has some references that are independent of the vendor. QVVERTYVS (hm?) 21:05, 3 March 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Performance Analyzer, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page MPI. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:30, 4 March 2015 (UTC)

A/UX teamwork barnstar for you!

The Teamwork Barnstar

Thank you very much for working with me on A/UX. You seriously brought the goods. I see on your User page that you are extremely good at this and wicked smart. I had been sad that the article was so lame and subjective, but I had no idea the subject was so relatively robust and amazingly foundational to 1990s enterprise computing culture until you brought all those great sources. By 1997, I knew someone who had a BeBox, I knew someone with MachTen, I had a Mac IIsi with NetBSD and System 7.7 beta, but I had never heard of A/UX. I'm so sad. I should like to emulate it once the guy implements networking support. Let us raise our emulators and toast. Furthermore, I am a reference formatting wizard, and I regularly use named and list-based references with Template:Rp for pages, but you blew my mind with something which I can't believe I never heard of: Template:R. I may need to rethink my life. Thank you again. — Smuckola(talk) 14:56, 8 March 2015 (UTC)

Merger discussion for Hash tree (persistent data structure)

An article that you have been involved in editing, Hash tree (persistent data structure), has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. Padenton (talk) 22:58, 10 March 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited AI winter, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hype. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 13 March 2015 (UTC)

fcntl()

Hello. I want to know your opinion about having a separate article about fcntl() system call. I think it is notable enough to have a separate page, it is standardized by POSIX.1, besides that, there are some independent, reliable sources such as:

• W. Richard, Stevens; Stephen A., Rago (May 24, 2013). Advanced Programming in the UNIX Environment (Third ed.). Addison-Wesley Professional. p. 82. ISBN 978-0321637734. Retrieved 27 February 2015.
• Lehey, Greg. Porting UNIX Software. O'Reilly Media. p. 207. ISBN 978-1-56592-126-9.
• Kerrisk, Michael (October 28, 2010). The Linux Programming Interface. No Starch Press. p. 92. ISBN 978-1593272203.
• Rochkind, Marc J. (May 9, 2004). Advanced UNIX Programming (2nd ed.). Addison-Wesley Professional. p. 187. ISBN 978-0131411548.

Thank you. -- Bkouhi (talk) 18:12, 16 March 2015 (UTC)

Do any of those sources provide significant coverage besides simple usage, like the kind of history we have in Fork (system call)? I'm certainly not in favor of reinstating the old content, which goes against WP:NOTMANUAL. If you do have good additional material, you can also post it to File descriptor first, then see if the topic deserves its own article. QVVERTYVS (hm?) 20:03, 16 March 2015 (UTC)

The coverage is somewhat significant in various sources, but this coverage is just technical details, not like fork(), thus the article would not be more than another man page and it is hard to provide encyclopedic description. I'm now convinced that a separate article is not needed. But good idea, since this system call has been widely covered by reliable sources, IMHO it should be somehow covered by Wikipedia too, and the File descriptor article is a good place to start. Please correct me if I'm wrong. Thank you. -- Bkouhi (talk) 21:03, 16 March 2015 (UTC)

No, go ahead. QVVERTYVS (hm?) 22:00, 16 March 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Newsqueak, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Keyboard. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:50, 22 March 2015 (UTC)

Blurbs

Hello Qwertyus,

You have twice removed a brief, referenced quotation from a museum website, the Kunsthal, providing critical commentary about an artist Carolein Smit who had a major three month solo exhibition there in 2010. You have called such a quote a "blurb" from an "advertisement". I do not believe that a respected museum's own web page is an "advertisement" and I believe that brief quotations of the descriptions published by the curators of such museums are worthy of inclusion in biographies of notable artists, especially five years after the exhibition has ended. I find this especially surprising given that you dd not remove some clearly promotional language referenced to the website of a commercial gallery that sells her work. I consider that paragraph far more problematic and had intended to remove it once I had added new content to the article. That's much more of a "blurb" in my opinion than the museum content you removed. I am interested in a more detailed explanation of your reasoning in this matter. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 00:09, 23 March 2015 (UTC)

I hadn't removed the other bits because I did now. Mentioning an exhibition at the Kunsthal is fine, but citing the museum's own announcement doesn't add any value, IMO. QVVERTYVS (hm?) 09:44, 23 March 2015 (UTC)

Art and Artificial Intelligence

QWERTYUS, you probably already know about this, but when you have a chance, please check out the additions to the "Criticism and comment" section of Deep Learning and the article referenced therein -- I would rather that my friends take the first shots at all of this! And be sure to take a look at the first footnote of the article proper. Synchronist (talk) 23:56, 28 March 2015 (UTC)

Update: Dragan has already cracked the whip, and I am groaning under it! Synchronist (talk) 18:11, 29 March 2015 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) Umh, my intentions aren't to whip anyone. :) — Dsimic (talk | contribs) 05:04, 30 March 2015 (UTC)

Marriage a la facon du pays

Hey, I definitely appreciate all of the help that you have done to the article that we have worked on for our class. I'm just curious what we do with the parts of the citations which you have left out because now we have pageSydpphillips (talk) 22:20, 9 April 2015 (UTC) numbers randomly throughout the article. If you could either fix that or give us some suggestions in regard to how to fix that it would be appreciated. Sydpphillips (talk) 22:20, 9 April 2015 (UTC)

I'm not sure what you mean by "parts of the citations which [I] have left out". QVVERTYVS (hm?) 07:21, 10 April 2015 (UTC)

DK1

Fair enough! Thanks, Pdfpdf (talk) 15:39, 11 April 2015 (UTC)

@Pdfpdf: I didn't search very thoroughly for other DK1s. Please revert as soon as you find one! QVVERTYVS (hm?) 15:40, 11 April 2015 (UTC)

LOL!

As it happens, I'm quite happy with DK1 being a redirect ;-) Cheers, Pdfpdf (talk) 15:44, 11 April 2015 (UTC)

Thakur Sitaramdas Omkarnath

Hello Qwertyus, I would like to ask if you can help improving this article - Thakur Sitaramdas Omkarnath
Thank You Abhishek.bose2033 (talk) 22:10, 12 April 2015 (UTC)

Conspiracy theories about Joseph stalin's death

now i removed copyrighted infringement sources from that article now i freshly created that article and i used external websites as a source of information. expect the quotation part. if these time if you find the article inappropriate please tag it proposed for deletion i will improve the article ..

Disambiguation link notification for April 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited DukeNet Communications, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Telecom. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:27, 13 April 2015 (UTC)

HPE disambiguation

Thanks for taking the time to flesh out HPE_(disambiguation) with some more entries!

MeekMark (talk) 17:00, 15 April 2015 (UTC)

You're welcome :) QVVERTYVS (hm?) 17:31, 15 April 2015 (UTC)

An issue with the Formal logic link

I appreciate your reversion of my edit to the Prolog article's link to the formal logic article. Unfortunately, "formal logic" automatically redirect to the Mathematical logic article, which you find in error. Just to let you know so you can maybe cleanup that that redirect or discuss it on a relevant talk page. Cheers! Bumm13 (talk) 13:41, 16 April 2015 (UTC)

Nevermind, you already fixed it! :D Bumm13 (talk) 13:42, 16 April 2015 (UTC)

Yes. I find it rather strange that enwiki has no article about formal or symbolic logic per se, but the redirect to mathematical logic is simply in error. In casual parlance, the two might be the same, but among logicians, mathematical logic is really the application of logic to mathematics: metamathematics, proof theory, etc. Not the application to arbitrary programming problems that people do in Prolog. QVVERTYVS (hm?) 14:29, 16 April 2015 (UTC)

Warnings, threats ...

Please do not create pages that attack, threaten, or disparage their subject. Attack pages and files are not tolerated
by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who create or add such material may be blocked from editing Wikipedia.
Thank you.

Please explain what you are referring to, "my" subpages? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Quessler (talk • contribs) 22:32, 1 May 2015 (UTC)

@Quessler: I was referring to your blacklist. See WP:POLEMIC. QVVERTYVS (hm?) 09:24, 2 May 2015 (UTC)

The lion in love

Hi, Qwertyus, I note that you have queried my use of primary sources in the Idioms section of the above article and am rather puzzled by what you expect in their place. To begin with, I give a Google Books ref for an adult romance novel, as I've seen many others do in Wiki articles. There's a romance website with a review, and mentions of the book on both Amazon and Barnes & Noble; would they be viable and in what way would they be superior? Or are you looking for evidence that a reference to the idiom is intended by the author?

I guess one could ask the same question about paintings with that title. And in the case of associated idioms, is a dictionary reference rather than evidence that they were used in the past preferable? I'd be grateful if you could point me to the guidelines on use of primary sources so that I can avoid such pitfalls in future. Thx Mzilikazi1939 (talk) 13:21, 5 May 2015 (UTC)

Yes, I'm looking for evidence of intended reference. This is Wikipedia policy (WP:ANALYSIS):

Policy: Wikipedia articles usually rely on material from reliable secondary sources. Articles may make an analytic or evaluative claim only if that has been published by a reliable secondary source.

The Lion in Love (fable)#Idioms only cites novels and asserts, without proof, that all these works of art refer to the Greek fable. You should really cite some literary criticism for this kind of thing. QVVERTYVS (hm?) 14:30, 5 May 2015 (UTC)

You're looking for intended reference to an English idiom? Forgive me, but this seems like a personal interpretation of guidelines. Since I've had bad experiences with self-appointed policeman on WP, I must ask you if you are an administrator. Mzilikazi1939 (talk) 18:08, 5 May 2015 (UTC)

I'm not an admin. I'm not sure what you mean by an English idiom; you're connecting English, Russian and French works with a Greek fable. QVVERTYVS (hm?) 20:20, 5 May 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for the heads-up. I've now rewritten parts of the article and added some references. Mzilikazi1939 (talk) 12:40, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

Edges vs arcs

"Feedback edge set" has about 286 hits on Google scholar, while "feedback arc set" has about 1460. So regardless of whether "edge" or "arc" is in more common usage more generally in graph theory, it seems clear to me that "feedback arc set" is the much more frequently used name for this problem. In addition, "arc" has the advantage that (when used in graph theory) it unambiguously refers to directed graphs, while "edge" could be for either the directed or undirected case (although the undirected case of this problem is not very interesting as an algorithmic problem). Based on that, and WP:COMMONNAME, would you please reverse your recent move to the less-common name? —David Eppstein (talk) 22:04, 9 May 2015 (UTC)

@David Eppstein: did that, thanks for doing some research. QVVERTYVS (hm?) 07:33, 10 May 2015 (UTC)

Signing Edits

Heya, thanks for the help!

Should I re-do my changes so they are signed? Also, I contributed to the page a bit when I was not signed up (so my IP is shown). Is there any way for me to change that so it shows my name now? (On the view history page)

LythPython (talk) 00:27, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

Hi,

No, you should only sign edits on talk pages. To be honest, I'm not aware of any way to claim IP edits. You could ask over at the WP:Help desk.

HTH, QVVERTYVS (hm?) 07:09, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

AfD: Pantacles of Athens has closed

The Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pantacles of Athens discussion has closed as a consensus "merge." The closing admin, SamWalton, identified four of the 40 articles for further talk page discussion whether they should be merged to the list or maintained as stand-alone articles: Talk:Dandes of Argos, Talk:Philinus of Cos (athlete), Talk:Oebotas of Dyme and Talk:Eurybus of Athens. Your input is requested on those article talk pages. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 19:59, 27 May 2015 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Content	Headings	Images	Links	Sources	Tagged with…
342		Strong and weak typing (talk)						Add sources
54		Db4o (talk)						Add sources
30		Sheikh Bedreddin (talk)						Add sources
291		Concurrent computing (talk)						Add sources
154		Priority inversion (talk)						Add sources
570		Liskov substitution principle (talk)						Add sources
330		Monitor (synchronization) (talk)						Cleanup
150		Read-copy-update (talk)						Cleanup
5,004		Kingpin (comics) (talk)						Cleanup
240		Boosting (machine learning) (talk)						Expand
53		Empirical risk minimization (talk)						Expand
409		Comparison of C Sharp and Java (talk)						Expand
32		Perur Pateeswarar Temple (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
960		Brutalist architecture (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
459		P. G. Wodehouse (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
1,203		Compiler (talk)						Merge
79		Lamport's bakery algorithm (talk)						Merge
167		Ordered logit (talk)						Merge
220		Lego Star Wars III: The Clone Wars (talk)						Wikify
275		Source lines of code (talk)						Wikify
54		AllegroGraph (talk)						Wikify
2		Research Institute for Nuclear Problems of Belarusian State University (talk)						Orphan
4		European American Chamber of Commerce (talk)						Orphan
11		POSXML (talk)						Orphan
36		Blocking (computing) (talk)						Stub
45		Fetch-and-add (talk)						Stub
40		Scheduler pattern (talk)						Stub
24		Belle (chess machine) (talk)						Stub
107		Futex (talk)						Stub
39		Memory model (programming) (talk)						Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 14:19, 30 May 2015 (UTC)

Hosting Controller

I have now added appropriate 3rd party references to the article.--HostingController123 (talk) 22:28, 31 May 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by HostingController123 (talk • contribs) 22:20, 31 May 2015 (UTC)

@HostingController123: a business partner is obviously not a third-party. QVVERTYVS (hm?) 06:21, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

I do not understand how this article is inappropriate. Hosting Controller is a notable and reliable control panel and has been in the market for 15 years now. People have the right to know about it. Its part of the following Wikipedia article https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_web_hosting_control_panels and it shows that its a popular software. It has a huge following. The style is not promotional and the list of competition in the article proves that. I am unable to link the dead reference. How to do that ? Besides if you can provide solid suggestions to improve it you are always welcome.--Yul at Hosting Controller (talk) 07:12, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

@Yul at Hosting Controller: you need to prove the notability of software by coming up with unaffiliated references that provide significant coverage. Inclusion in the Comparison of web hosting control panels doesn't prove anything, except that some random Wikipedia contributor added it. A "huge following" needs to be proven. Existing for fifteen years doesn't mean anything either. QVVERTYVS (hm?) 08:24, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

As required I have now included ample 3rd party (unaffiliated) references establishing notability of Hosting Controller and providing significant coverage to it. Please check the inline references.--Yul at Hosting Controller (talk) 13:27, 3 June 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yul at Hosting Controller (talk • contribs) 13:21, 3 June 2015 (UTC)

Sorry about that

I didn't realize M16A2 was a disambiguation. Yeesh. Faceless Enemy (talk) 21:09, 9 June 2015 (UTC)

No problem :) QVVERTYVS (hm?) 21:12, 9 June 2015 (UTC)

Reference errors on 9 June

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Olympic winners of the Stadion race page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:34, 10 June 2015 (UTC)

Need citation/Clarification

Can you please provide the reference or context for arriving with following statement? When employed in industrial contexts, machine learning methods may be referred to as predictive analytics or predictive modelling. Thanks naren (talk) 12:41, 11 June 2015 (UTC)

nvattikuti take it to Talk:Machine learning. I'm not sure why you're asking me, I only toned down that statement. QVVERTYVS (hm?) 14:20, 11 June 2015 (UTC)