User talk:Quill

Please Note: I like to see conversation all in one place, so will usually respond here.

And I HATE beligerant junk on my page so I delete it.

Fortunately, most people leave nice stuff.

I also remove old stuff just because.

"Sugarlumps"?[edit]

Glad to know that you, too, are still around and OK and occasionally fixing things on WP. I'm no longer in the top 300 editors, thank goodness--by a long shot-- but still, there's always *something* that needs a quick edit. Elf | Talk 22:21, 3 October 2012 (UTC) P.S. It's been four years at least! Ack![reply]

WP:Anglican navbox colour discussion[edit]

Hullo, fellow WikiProject-er. We're having a discussion about the colours of Anglicanism navboxes. Please do come along and weigh in. D B D 18:44, 30 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Jonangi[edit]

The article Jonangi has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No references in google books or google scholar; not notable.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TKK ^{bark !} 15:18, 27 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Social injustice for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Social injustice is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Social injustice until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Orange Mike | Talk 01:24, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:16, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red World Contest[edit]

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

Proposed deletion of Regards ring[edit]

The article Regards ring has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Appears to only rely on one or two sources, checked and I couldn't find anything else

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Stilistic (talk) 22:02, 25 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Merger discussion for Breed standard[edit]

An article that you have been involved in editing—Breed standard—has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. Cavalryman (talk) 02:40, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Merger discussion for Old English Terrier[edit]

An article that you have been involved in editing—Old English Terrier—has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. Cavalryman (talk) 23:37, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Novelty show[edit]

The article Novelty show has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Normal Op (talk) 04:50, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Revival (theatre)[edit]

The article Revival (theatre) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

dictionary definition WP:NOTDIC

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. rsjaffe talk 23:34, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Schoolmaster for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Schoolmaster is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Schoolmaster until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Qwirkle (talk) 07:54, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Hound Group" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Hound Group and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 November 15#Hound Group until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Steel1943 (talk) 08:40, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

dropping by briefly for memories sake[edit]

I use Wikipedia all the time, but hardly ever edit anymore. But as usual I went looking for one thing, which led to another thing which led to another thing… Simply following links. And then I went back to my own user pages to see what was going on and happened to encounter something from you from 2006 I think. Just saying hi. So… I'm just saying hi back. I see that you don't do Wikipedia work anymore? And haven't for years? Too bad. I think we had fun for a while. Hope you're doing well. Elf | Talk 22:12, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, Leading man[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Leading man. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Leading actor. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Leading actor. If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. -- Aunva6^{talk - contribs} 15:58, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Entire (animal)" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

The redirect Entire (animal) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 16 § Entire (animal) until a consensus is reached. 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 (talk) 21:02, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]