User talk:QuackersClocks
QuackersClocks, you are invited on a Wikipedia Adventure![edit]
|
Nomination for deletion of Template:Profile[edit]
Template:Profile has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Alakzi (talk) 18:50, 4 September 2015 (UTC)
November 2015[edit]
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Home (2015 animated film) has been reverted.
Your edit here to Home (2015 animated film) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zg82CyyiR_E) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. a sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy, as well as other parts of our external links guideline. If the information you linked to is indeed in violation of copyright, then such information should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file, or consider linking to the original.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 01:31, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
- I have reverted the edit and removed the link.
QuackersClocks (talk) 1:51, November 9, 2015 (UTC)
Hello, I'm NatGertler. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Home (2015 animated film) because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. Nat Gertler (talk) 15:39, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
- It is a real review if you look at this.
{{{1}}} 21:59, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Home (2015 animated film) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Nat Gertler (talk) 22:30, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
Talkback[edit]
Message added 15:38, 17 November 2015 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Nat Gertler (talk) 15:38, 17 November 2015 (UTC)
Talkback[edit]
Message added 16:13, 17 November 2015 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Nat Gertler (talk) 16:13, 17 November 2015 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:Quackers[edit]
Template:Quackers has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. —Godsy(TALKCONT) 18:04, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
November 2015[edit]
Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Template for discussion notices from templates, or remove other people's comments in Templates for discussion debates, as you did with Template:Quackers. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of the template, please comment in the discussion instead. Thank you. —Godsy(TALKCONT) 18:12, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of QuackersClocks[edit]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on QuackersClocks requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. JTtheOG (talk) 00:56, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
If you could add more to it, it wouldn't be a problem.
01:00, January 30, 2016 (UTC)
Problems with upload of File:QuackersClocks.png[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:QuackersClocks.png. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.
To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 03:05, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
Notification about disabling the Wikipedia collections tool[edit]
Thank you for using the collections feature in Wikipedia beta! Due to technical and moderation issues, we will be turning off this experimental feature. Your collections will be available for viewing and export until March 1st. If you would like to save your collection as links on a special Wikipedia page, please fill out the following form. If you are interested in giving your feedback about Wikipedia Collections please do so here.
Thanks,
Jon Katz
Product manager, Wikimedia Foundation
Jkatz (WMF) (talk) 00:00, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure![edit]
- Hi QuackersClocks! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
-- 21:20, Thursday, April 7, 2016 (UTC)
| Mission 1 | Mission 2 | Mission 3 | Mission 4 | Mission 5 | Mission 6 | Mission 7 |
| Say Hello to the World | An Invitation to Earth | Small Changes, Big Impact | The Neutral Point of View | The Veil of Verifiability | The Civility Code | Looking Good Together |
April 2016[edit]
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Home (2015 film). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. This is not the place to try to promote your stuff toy. There are plenty of places you can build a website about him. Nat Gertler (talk) 01:56, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
He's a computer animated character, not a toy. And besides, I cant. Wikia infinietly blocked me. And I was helping out. And I was only doing a late April Fools joke. I understand vandalism is bad. I would have reverted the person's edits
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Home (2015 film). Nat Gertler (talk) 02:12, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Acroterion (talk) 02:20, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
QuackersClocks (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
original unblock reason
Decline reason:
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
QuackersClocks (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
original unblock reason
Decline reason:
I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that
- the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
- the block is no longer necessary because you
- understand what you have been blocked for,
- will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
- will make useful contributions instead.
Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. OhNoitsJamie Talk 21:12, 12 April 2016 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- Note to editors considering unblocking: while blocked, this user has been using IP addresses to continue to vandalize Home (2015 film). --Nat Gertler (talk) 01:42, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
QuackersClocks (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I do feel this block in unnecessary and I will not damage or hurt the encyclopedia again. I have understood what I was blocked for, which is vandalism, I will not continue this again, and I will help you build Wikipedia even more.
Decline reason:
Please indicate how you will contribute to the encyclopedia if unblocked. Huon (talk) 22:37, 12 April 2016 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
QuackersClocks (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I will help with the Home article, not vandalize it. BUT, I need the plot to revise for Home: A Milk and Quackers Movie. Don't say I can't do it. The film is legit.
Decline reason:
If your entire purpose on Wikipedia is to promote your own YouTube video, Wikipedia is better off without your contributions. Huon (talk) 00:39, 13 April 2016 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
QuackersClocks (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
It isn't a YouTube video. It will be a real animated movie. Trust me. ANd by the way, that's not why I'm on Wikipedia. I'm here to get away from Wikia because they can't seem to respect me. And I also wanted to edit pages as well, specifically Home. I won't ever bother anyone again. And I don't think my whole response was clear to you. I also said I would HELP with the Home article.
Decline reason:
If you think you can create an article based on "It will be a real animated movie. Trust me", then you have no place here. Also, to prevent our having to waste any further time responding to effectively identical unblock requests, I have removed your ability to edit this talk page. Please use WP:UTRS if you wish to make a further appeal. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 08:15, 13 April 2016 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- If for some reason he is allowed to resume editing, I ask that he be specifically barred from the Home article (and clearly related articles); for whatever reason, that inspired most of his promotional vandalism, and keeping him away from it might help him resist further temptation. --Nat Gertler (talk) 01:18, 13 April 2016 (UTC)
- What, I said I would help.
- <original blocking editor comment> Recommend removal of talkpage privileges, I see no indication that this editor understands the problem or intends to change. If they've been blocked from Wikia for promoting their own video I see no reason to allow them to do so here. Acroterion (talk) 01:46, 13 April 2016 (UTC)
- I agree that talk page privileges should be revoked as their use of the unblock template so frequently in this short amount of time is disruptive. @Acroterion: I'd also recommend expanding the block rationale by adding that their username is promotional and has been used to make promotional edits, so if an unblock request were to be granted at sometime in the future, a username change would be due.—Godsy(TALKCONT) 05:22, 13 April 2016 (UTC)
- <original blocking editor comment> Recommend removal of talkpage privileges, I see no indication that this editor understands the problem or intends to change. If they've been blocked from Wikia for promoting their own video I see no reason to allow them to do so here. Acroterion (talk) 01:46, 13 April 2016 (UTC)
- What, I said I would help.