User talk:Prodge

Welcome!

Hello, Prodge, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! The JPS ^{talk to me} 09:11, 5 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Ian_kirkby_ymwli.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Ian_kirkby_ymwli.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 10:23, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Lily Allen edits[edit]

Hi Prodge, I completely disagree with your comment. The aim of Wikipedia is to be an encyclopedia, not a news outlet. We report events that are covered by reliable sources, and techdirt is not one of them. There's no being "behind" or "ahead" the mainstream media, they are the secondary sources we need and this is not a race. Here, Techdirt is a primary source (they "created" the event and can't be expected to have a neutral point of view). This is especially not debatable when covering biographies of living people. In regards to your comment about the media being "frightened to touch" the issues, this is especially why we do NOT use primary sources (or we'd have plenty of conspiracy theories around). I hope you understand, but this is extremely important for Wikipedia. -- Luk ^talk 12:11, 27 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Matthew Butler (Tiswas) for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Matthew Butler (Tiswas) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matthew Butler (Tiswas) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 19:14, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]