User talk:Pròssia
April 2024[edit]
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice:
{{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
Pròssia (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Hi, I have been notified that my account has been blocked indefinitely. I would like to know what offense I have committed. I have not been involved in any edit wars or anything like that. I do not have two accounts nor have I used them to abuse any page.Pròssia (talk)
Decline reason:
You were blocked based on WP:CHECKUSER data indicating you were abusing multiple accounts as per El Caganer and The Penfield Homunculus. Yamla (talk) 12:57, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
I have verified the CU evidence that lead to the block, it is indeed 
Highly likely in this case. --Yamla (talk) 13:02, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
Pròssia (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
This blocking is an abuse. I expect a well reasoned answer. Wikipedia disabled me the option to create a new user for 15 days to use multiple accounts (I didn't know it couldn't be done, sorry. I was new here). After the punishment was served, I created a new user (Pròssia). This user has not broken any regulations or is involved in any irregular situation. I take it you don't want me to edit wikipedia ever again? Why did you allow me to create a new account with the same IP but not allow me to edit? I repeat, it is an abuse. You are punishing me several times. Pròssia (talk) 14:19, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
Decline reason:
You need to return to your original account and request unblock there, or at a minimum explain why you can't. Either way, you will need to speak to the reason for the original block. 331dot (talk) 16:23, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- How can I resolve this? Pròssia (talk) 14:23, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
Pròssia (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Notes:
- In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
- Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:
{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I wish I could go back to the original user (The Penfield Homunculus) but I've lost my passwords. Please be able to reverse this situation. I will not do multi user actions again. It was new and I thought it could be done. I was blocked from editing on the Catalonia talk page and I have not edited with this user again to prevent any further blocking. Again, I am not involved in any edit war nor have I committed any wrongdoing with this user. I wish I could make productive edits on wikipedia. Please give me a solution, thanks. [[User:Pròssia|Pròssia]] ([[User talk:Pròssia#top|talk]]) 04:35, 28 April 2024 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}
If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.
{{unblock reviewed |1=I wish I could go back to the original user (The Penfield Homunculus) but I've lost my passwords. Please be able to reverse this situation. I will not do multi user actions again. It was new and I thought it could be done. I was blocked from editing on the Catalonia talk page and I have not edited with this user again to prevent any further blocking. Again, I am not involved in any edit war nor have I committed any wrongdoing with this user. I wish I could make productive edits on wikipedia. Please give me a solution, thanks. [[User:Pròssia|Pròssia]] ([[User talk:Pròssia#top|talk]]) 04:35, 28 April 2024 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}
If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:
{{unblock reviewed |1=I wish I could go back to the original user (The Penfield Homunculus) but I've lost my passwords. Please be able to reverse this situation. I will not do multi user actions again. It was new and I thought it could be done. I was blocked from editing on the Catalonia talk page and I have not edited with this user again to prevent any further blocking. Again, I am not involved in any edit war nor have I committed any wrongdoing with this user. I wish I could make productive edits on wikipedia. Please give me a solution, thanks. [[User:Pròssia|Pròssia]] ([[User talk:Pròssia#top|talk]]) 04:35, 28 April 2024 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}
Please place new posts at the bottom. This may be easier to do if you click "edit" at the top and not "reply". I'm not a CU(only a CU can authorize the removal of this block) but it's likely any solution is going to involve the standard offer. 331dot (talk) 09:19, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
Wikipedia and copyright[edit]
Hello Pròssia! Your additions to FC Barcelona have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, it's important to understand and adhere to guidelines about using information from sources to prevent copyright and plagiarism issues. Here are the key points:
- Limited quotation: You may only copy or translate a small portion of a source. Any direct quotations must be enclosed in double quotation marks (") and properly cited using an inline citation. More information is available on the non-free content page. To learn how to cite a source, see Help:Referencing for beginners.
- Paraphrasing: Beyond limited quotations, you are required to put all information in your own words. Following the source's wording too closely can lead to copyright issues and is not permitted; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when paraphrasing, you must still cite your sources as appropriate.
- Image use guidelines: In most scenarios, only freely licensed or public domain images may be used and these should be uploaded to our sister project, Wikimedia Commons. In some scenarios, non-freely copyrighted content can be used if they meet all ten of our non-free content criteria; Wikipedia:Plain and simple non-free content guide may help with determining a file's elegibility.
- Copyrighted material donation: If you hold the copyright to the content you want to copy, or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license the text for publication here. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
- Copying and translation within Wikipedia: Wikipedia articles can be copied or translated, however they must have proper attribution in accordance with Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. For translation, see Help:Translation § License requirements.
It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices. Persistent failure to comply may result in being blocked from editing. If you have any questions or need further clarification, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 14:06, 28 April 2024 (UTC)