User talk:Portlius

Mark, have you read guidelines ? I suspect you are likely to be called on that. Not by me, I might add, I have no issue with most of your updates - in fact if Mark Labbett gets deleted and the rest of the individual entries stay, I'll try to put it back. I'd like to see entries for individual quiz players, but new entries are regularly challenged as being not of general note, and I think these might be, quite possibly by editors who know nothing at all about quizzing. -- Ian Dalziel 08:22, 8 May 2006 (UTC)

By the way, if you leave the four tildes together after your posts, your id and the timestamp are inserted automatically -- Ian Dalziel 20:30, 8 May 2006 (UTC)

Welcome

Hello Portlius, and welcome to Wikipedia! Here are some recommended guidelines to help you get involved. Please feel free to contact me if you need help with anything. Best of luck and happy editing! Jibbles | Talk 00:26, 22 July 2006 (UTC) Getting started Wikipedia Tutorial How to edit a page The five pillars of Wikipedia Manual of Style Be bold in editing How to write a great article WikiProjects Getting your info out there Cite your sources Neutral Point of View Point of View Verifiability Uploading images Image use policy Getting more Wikipedia rules Policy Library Getting help New contributors' help page Where to ask a question Help Desk Frequently Asked Questions Getting along Wikipedians Wikiquette Civility Sign your posts Conflict resolution Getting technical Pages needing attention Peer review Utilities Village pump

==Milhous Warriors== A tag has been placed on Milhous Warriors, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be a biographical account about a person, group of people, or band, but it does not indicate how or why he/she/they is/are notable. If you can indicate why Milhous Warriors is really notable, I advise you to edit the article promptly, and also put a note on Talk:Milhous Warriors. Any admin should check for such edits before deleting the article. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 7 under Articles. You might also want to read our general biography criteria. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. To contest the tagging and request that admins should wait a while for you to assert his/her/their notability, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and then immediately add such an assertion. It is also a very good idea to add citations from reliable sources to ensure that your article will be verifiable. Jibbles | Talk 00:26, 22 July 2006 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Portlius! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to insure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 943 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

1. Mark Labbett - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 21:18, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of Mark Labbett for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mark Labbett is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mark Labbett until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Nomoskedasticity (talk) 20:04, 10 May 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Ian Bayley

The article Ian Bayley has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced BLP, I couldn't find sources to confirm he is notable.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Boleyn (talk) 07:01, 10 April 2024 (UTC)