User talk:Pierceybrian25

In response to your feedback[edit]

Thanks for visiting! If you have questions, visit Wikipedia:Tutorial or contact me at my talk page.

SwisterTwister talk 17:52, 14 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

July 2012[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at 2013 and beyond in film, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. Cresix (talk) 00:12, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at 2013 and beyond in film, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Cresix (talk) 00:15, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Do you like to edit? I'm not getting off the subject will you? --Brian J. Piercey (talk) 00:23, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If that made any sense whatsoever I might respond to it. Remove content again without a good reason (explained) and I promise you'll be blocked. Cresix (talk) 00:26, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry if I can reach to your responds my computer isn't still working due to something else. --Brian J. Piercey (talk) 23:08, 25 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

Materialscientist (talk) 23:29, 25 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry if I can reach to your responds my computer isn't still working due to something else. --Brian J. Piercey (talk) 23:08, 25 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your reach sense none so no-no sense no-no response block yes-yes. Cresix (talk) 00:23, 26 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Never mind. --Brian J. Piercey (talk) 22:42, 27 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Do not add content to articles such as Now That's What I Call Music! discography without also providing a reliable source. You and your latest IP are close to breaking the WP:3RR rule. --Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 23:13, 27 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

According to Now: British booklet their are 2 Now CD's are coming out: Now 44 will be out November 13th, 2012 and Now Today's Christmas will be out Holiday Season, 2012 (that I'm not to sure when is that releasing). --Brian J. Piercey (talk) 23:33, 27 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Those booklets are very unreliable and are not independently verified. I will remove the info you added shortly, or you can. When it's confirmed by other sources, you can re-add it then. --Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 23:47, 27 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

August, 2012[edit]

When Now Today's Christmas will be out and confirm to any other sources and it's on Now British booklet and also Now 43 booklet and it's confirm to any reliable sources will confirm to Amazon.com or Sears.com just going to wait for this month and as for Now 44 will be out November 13, 2012 and it will start to confirm any other reliable sources until October, 2012. --Brian J. Piercey (talk) 23:50, 3 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppets are not welcome here. Go away. Cresix (talk) 23:56, 3 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I don't have is sockpuppets in my username. --Brian J. Piercey (talk) 00:41, 4 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of Pierceybrian22. Cresix (talk) 00:44, 4 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Not pierceybrian25. --Brian J. Piercey (talk) 00:46, 4 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Bullshit. Cresix (talk) 00:47, 4 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

1. I don't like that word. 2. Stop cursing like that in front of the people in this website (including me). --Brian J. Piercey (talk) 00:49, 4 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

And no one here likes sockpuppets. There are lots of people watching your edits that you make with your various socks. If you're smart, you'll clean up your act and edit according to policies, or go away. Otherwise you will get a long-term block. And that's my final word on the matter, but I'm watching your edits. Cresix (talk) 00:52, 4 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

What kind of sockpuppets? And you be better watch your language is that quite clear and I don't like that word are you using these kind of bad language in this website never. --Brian J. Piercey (talk) 00:57, 4 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry is the abuse of multiple accounts by an editor. It's pretty clear that you've edited from this account today and also from 71.172.196.12 (talk · contribs), although I'm willing to assume good faith that you forgot to log in when you were editing from the IP. The issue is that you appear to have used multiple other accounts in the past—and been blocked from those accounts. Using alternate accounts to edit while your main account is blocked is not allowed. —C.Fred (talk) 01:01, 4 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I always log in before I search all kinds of things and making that counts too. --Brian J. Piercey (talk) 01:05, 4 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Is there any way to make sure Brian Piercey never edits on Wikipedia again. Unfortunately, long-term blocks do not work (see Pierceybrian22 and Pierceybrian23) as he just comes back editing as an IP, a dynamic IP at that, and I can't get a range block because he is more like a gnat, just annoying as all get out. Go away gnat! --Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 01:08, 4 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

My name is Brian Piercey. One thing what's gnat mean? --Brian J. Piercey (talk) 01:13, 4 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Look it up. --Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 01:17, 4 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

So, it's a bug? --Brian J. Piercey (talk) 01:20, 4 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources, as you did to 2013 and beyond in film. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. —C.Fred (talk) 01:42, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'm feel like in a movie of "Transformers 4" starring myself and my girlfriend in that film. --Brian J. Piercey (talk) 01:50, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

With all due respect, we don't care what you feel like. We care what is verifiable in newspapers or other reliable sources. —C.Fred (talk) 02:17, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is my future is myself and my girlfriend want to be actor or actress want to be in that film of "Transformers 4" including the other films this is my future is and that's I want to do. --Brian J. Piercey (talk) 23:10, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

August 2012[edit]

This is your last warning. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Now That's What I Call Music! discography, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Cresix (talk) 14:53, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Do you want me to do is sandboxing it? --Brian J. Piercey (talk) 23:12, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at 2013 and beyond in film, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Cresix (talk) 23:52, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Would you stop with "last warning" please? thank you. --Brian J. Piercey (talk) 23:51, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

September 2012[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Elockid ^(Talk) 00:36, 1 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I don't like to curse on a movie of "Kick-A** 2" and I won't disruptive editing and that's not called for. --Brian J. Piercey (talk) 23:29, 1 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The movie should properly be listed with its full, if profane by your definition, title: Wikipedia is not censored. However, your block goes beyond just that edit to a long-term pattern of disruption across multiple accounts. You have been indefinitely blocked; unless an administrator is willing to unblock you (and, for the record, I am not), you may not edit Wikipedia in any fashion outside of discussion on the talk page of one of your accounts. —C.Fred (talk) 23:52, 1 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Why I'm not be editing Wikipedia? --Brian J. Piercey (talk) 22:40, 29 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]